In the aftermath of
As happy as I am to see Rich and the staff shoulder the blame for last Saturday's loss, one of Rodriguez' comments recently struck me as odd. The Free Press quoted Rodriguez as saying his players will play hard or they won't play at all. Sure, he does have a point.
Certainly, Rodriguez meant the statement as a challenge to his players. I'll bet hard currency he's said those exact words to his players in the locker room, albeit with a little more color in his cheeks and in his language. Control what you can control, yourself! If you play hard glory will be yours! Was it over when the Germans bombed
However, as compelling as I find Rodriguez plea to his players and his public stance on effort after last year’s subpar efforts, I’m not entirely sure lack of effort was the reason Michigan came away on the short end of the stick against the Utes. There has been a lot written about how good
What I saw on Saturday was an offense improperly suited for the personnel it put on the field. This is not to say these players can’t run the spread. They can. This isn’t theoretical physics, those third down charts Mgoblog does, or understanding why women gather in groups and cry whenever Jane Austen is mentioned. It’s football. And at its basic level, as Rodriguez has repeatedly told us it is, it’s a fairly simple offense. I didn’t see catastrophic mistakes by the line or players running the wrong way on a pitch. I saw a group of kids trying to execute a simple game plan that did not put them in the best position for success.
I’m sure there are players that will be singled out on both sides of the ball. Looked scared. Ran hesitantly. Late out of his stance. Ect. But as I pointed out yesterday, the offensive game plan used Saturday, was totally ill suited for the players it put on the field. The first half featured 9 rushes compared to 19 passes.
Instead,
Most of this is proposed for the sake of argument. I believe wholeheartedly the staff will produce results next week. Why? Because it’s clear they didn’t have a clue who would react well to game situations. Look at
Sure, there were mistakes. But the mantra of “play hard or don’t play at all” may not be applicable to this
Poll
What would've made the biggest difference on Saturday?
More running plays (10 votes)
More passing plays (3 votes)
Threet as the starter (45 votes)
More aggressive defense to start the game (94 votes)
More veteran tailbacks in the backfield (15 votes)
Different offensive gameplan (32 votes)
Different defensive gameplan (11 votes)
210 total votes


There are 0 Comments. Add Yours.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.