Agony of Defeat: Michigan Beats Michigan, Iowa Named Beneficiaries
Arg. Arg, arg, arg, arg, arg. Deep breath (remember man, we're so young), another deep breath... arg that was infuriating. How do we couch this? Well for one thing Michigan outplayed Iowa on Saturday night. An offensive line that was a glorified strainer last week turned their highly-touted D-line into a non-factor, we pounded the ball on the ground against a team that just doesn't give up rushing TDs to the tune of three of em and 200 yards on the ground (and that was without a lightning bolt big play in there too), we completely shut down Iowa's running game: 2.4 yards per carry, and the defensive line controlled the line of scrimmage throughout most of the night and came up with several huge stops, including a goal-line stand. And yet there's the 800 lb turnover beast that is sitting in the corner over there... five of those bad-boys, four completely unforced turnovers and one kinda-forced fumble proved to be just enough to hold Michigan back from knocking off the #12 team in the country on the road. Iowa did what you are supposed to do with gifts, they cashed them in, and it proved to be barely enough for Michigan to overcome. Two of the factors that Michigan fans, us included, worried about prior to the season reared their ugly head on Saturday night: play of the safeties, and freshman mistakes at QB. Mike Williams unfortunately showed up in the replays of many key plays last night in the entirely wrong way... I mean really, 3rd and @#%@#%@#@#% 24? 3rd and 24? Fans like to throw around "inexcusable" in all kinds of ways, but uh, giving up 3rd and 24 is inexcusable. To get beat once on a nicely timed throw to the TE was acceptable, to let it happen again was not. Anyways, more on that later too. The team's youth and lack of depth in certain spots showed up at the worst times last night, and we couldn't overcome it. Freshman mistakes? You betcha.
Miscellaneous
- There was some good old fashioned slobber-knocking in this football game, the crown jewel of which was the hit on Daryll Stonum's kickoff return... goodness gracious me, that was a lick.
- Um, when the ball was snapped over Ricky Stanzi's head in (I believe) the first half, and their running back simply tackled Jonas Mouton while he broke through the line... how's that not called a hold? It carries no consequence as I understand that we would've declined it as it put them in a 3rd and long anyways, but is there something I'm missing there, that has to be a flag right? If not, someone please educate me.
- Alright, a coaching quibble from me: why the onside kick? Three minutes and change was enough time, even with one timeout, to kick it deep and rely on your defense to come up with a stop and not forfeit 20-30 yards of field position. I didn't understand the call there.
- I was stunned, literally stunned, that Ferentz went for it on 4th and goal.
- This team isn't quite good enough to get away with playing poorly and winning, but hotdamn they're close.
Offense
- I guarantee some Iowa fan will wax poetic about how their defense caused the benching of Tate Forcier... which is patently wrong. Forcier's unforced errors last night that lead to him getting the hook. An unrushed throw into double coverage for the pick, a fumble in which he wasn't touched, tripping over a yardline on 2nd and 4 to kill a drive, happy feet in the pocket with good protection, and throws into areas that just simply did not make sense were the story of Tate's night. What ultimately lead to the benching was the series where we came out after a kickoff, promptly got a delay of game (AFTER A KICKOFF... BREAKING THINGS HERE), and he just started chucking the ball for no real apparent reason: he wasn't running the offense, and that earned him a spot on the bench. Iowa's D had nothing to do with the majority of these mistakes.
- Brings me to my next question... Tate is so good throwing on the run, why wasn't he rolling out more in this game?
- Hats off to the O-line, even sans Molk they turned in a great performance. After watching what happened last week, I was awfully worried about going up against Iowa's D-line, but the guys up front did a fantastic job giving our QBs time and creating holes.
- All night long the offense just couldn't quite get up to the pace we wanted to run at. It will come with more experience, but when we did approach that kind of speed, we moved the football.
- Oh yeah, about Denard Robinson getting the nod on that final drive... I can say at the time I didn't really question it, he had just driven us right down the field for a touchdown and looked quite good in doing so. Now then, the end result doesn't sit all that well with everyone who watched Forcier do nothing but look eight shades of awesome at the end of practically every game thus far this season. If I were wearing the headset, I probably would've tapped Tate's shoulder, looked him in the eye and said "Get it done" and sent him out there all while thanking Denard up and down for kick-starting the offense again. Even despite that, I am reluctant to second guess the call because based on what had happened in the game to that point, sending Denard back out there made all kinds of sense, he had made several good crisp throws on the previous drive and moved the ball down the field for a score, hard to argue with that. Let's recall that Denard got put into the game in an incredibly difficult position, down two scores late in the 4th and he too is a true freshman.
- Robinson made the one mistake you just can't make in that situation... I'm not sure what prompted the throw, particularly when he could've taken off (there was TONS of time) or hit Odoms for an easy first down, but ugh... That's all that needs to be said about it, just ugh.
- Brandon Minor finally looked like a healthy Brandon Minor out there, some really tough running from him in big spots, and he was pretty much responsible for an entire touchdown drive... BUT he also had that HORRIFYING fumble, which by the by was the ONLY forced turnover on the night. Maybe we're still spoiled by Mike Hart's excellence but uh, you can't fumble the football on a 3 yard gain in which you're going nowhere, just protect the thing... that just killed a big drive at the end of the first half.
- I liked the new pitch wrinkle we threw into the rushing game last night, and I have a feeling I will like it more when Carlos Brown is healthy and back on the field.
- Someone please tell me why we're not taking two to three deep shots a game, anyone? Anyone? Junior Hemingway and Daryll Stonum are essentially non-factors in our offense right now, and that should not be the case. Kevin Koger and Martavious Odoms again came up big with drive sustaining catches throughout the night, they are by far the most consistent aspects of this offense right now.
- 3 for 11 on 3rd down wasn't and isn't good enough.
Defense
- This defense is either on or off, there is no in-between it appears.
- Donovan Warren was incredible last night, and that's even with him dropping another pick inside Iowa's 25. Huge game from him, just huge.
- Fool me once, shame on you... Great call for Iowa's first TD to Moeaki, Mike Williams bit HARD on the fake-block and the middle of the field was beyond vacant. Fool me twice, shame on me: that it happened again was ludicrous.
- The safety play was appalling, no other word for it, appalling. The lack of ability of this defense to get off the freakin' field on 3rd and long has already shortened the lifespan of the majority of this fanbase, I guarantee it. I know we're tissue paper-thin, I know that, but there were mistakes made that even tissue-paper thin defenses can't make out there.
- Brandon Graham did whatever he wanted with whomever was lined up across from him, he was a beast last night. Mike Martin also played a very solid football game.
- Stevie Brown made a great read on that 3rd and goal stop, just a tremendous play. And actually, I thought the LBs as a group played well, Mouton and Ezeh seemed to be in position more often than not, and both made key plays during the game.
- We brought a lot more pressure last night, I liked that we brought guys up to the line of scrimmage and got into the backfield, it's just too bad the coverage wasn't up to par in key spots. In line with that, we saw much less of the soft coverage stuff giving up the sticks, which yay, but too many missed assignments particularly from the safeties.
- Troy Woolfolk stepped into the corner spot and made a number of big plays, you can count me as pleasantly surprised, that certainly was an area of concern heading towards kickoff and he played well.
Special Teams
- So if Iowa's punter is a "weapon" according to Brent Musberger, what's Zoltan Mesko? 53.8 yards per punt? Zounds!
- Why the dropped punt... just why? If you have to go to your knees to catch the punt, isn't it better to just let the stupid thing go? Iowa was going to get the ball anyway due to the "roughing" the kicker penalty, but good GOD, that was terrible.
- Our kick and punt coverage was decidedly "meh" last night, part of that was because Zoltan was hitting bombs and outkicking the coverage, but how many times did the first two guys not even touch their returner?
Overall
- After getting flat outplayed for the majority of the Michigan State game, this team responded in the areas that were truly lacking in East Lansing, and made gaffs that you just can't overcome against a solid team at home. Minus 4 in the turnover margin was the death knell for Michigan on Saturday night.
- So goes the Penn State game so goes the rest of the season, period. We need to destroy Delaware State and get ready for the Nittany Lions to come to Ann Arbor.
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Things to remember.
Great article SCM.
Despite the tough loss, there are some things to remember:
1. This is still a very, very young team – which is bound to make mistakes.
2. The defense came up with some great stops, especially on the goal line and in the fourth quarter.
3. Tate and Denard are a great combination – and they are only freshmen.
4. We competed very closely with two very good teams (notwithstanding MSU’s record) on their home turfs.
5. While we are 4 – 2, we could easily be 6 – 0 or 2 – 4.
6. This team is a lot of fun to watch – it has worked very hard (both players and coaches) and has a lot of heart.
7. The coaches have made some great adjustments at halftime and during the game.
8. This team just does not give up!!!
GO BLUE!!!
by Chicago Wolverine on Oct 11, 2009 12:35 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Can't disagree with any of that!
I'm going signature-less for a while...
by Pinchy The Lobster on Oct 11, 2009 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Downfield passing
Look at the balls Tate did throw down field. Slow floaters that allowed the defense to have what appears to be double coverage. He should have been picked 2-3 more times. What the hell was with throwing 30 yards down field like that when you’re in the shadow of the goal posts?
It seems like Tate was trying to go down field too much, and he wasn’t able to handle it. Maybe it was the slippery balls, maybe it is just his lack of parabolic beauty on deep passes in general. I’d like to see video of every deep ball he’s thrown, complete or not, to test this. I have a sneaking suspicion that his arm strength just isn’t there.
Just my e-pinion.
by formerlyanonymous on Oct 11, 2009 12:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
D Rob
Excellent article summarizing the Good, Bad & Ugly. Cuz ther was A LOT of good. One very good, is that DR showed that he can lead the team on a complete drive by himself (w/o Tate) and litterally by himself.. I think he was responsible for 100% of the yards on that drive!
DR showed he can do two things well:
1) With no fake, no feint, no deception in any way, he can run for 5-6 yards RIGHT UP THE MIDDLE, almost every 1st or 2nd down. No defense has shown that they can stop that. It is an ugly effective play that I dont understand how it works; but IS THERE ANYTHNG WRONG With it ? Nope.
2) He can roll out, and b/c the defense is so worried about his speed (they s/b), he can fire a little 7 yard gainer, very high success rate play. Anything wrong with that? Not a thing.
3) What he CANT do is drop back and throw down field, so WHY WHY do they keep forcing that. From what I saw he can do #1 and #2 all day long.
QB’s with great feet can effectively run things this way. Good Passing QB’s who can drop back, read a defense and effectively throw down field are RARE. DR will never be able todo that, but he can still win a college footbal game for us.
by jscoleman on Oct 11, 2009 1:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Last drive
I don’t understand how anyone can justify using Robinson on that last drive simply because he score a TD on the previous drive. He also took 4:26 to go 60 yards for that TD. Now you get the ball back w/ 1:30 and no TOs remaining and you think he can get the 50 yards needed to get into FG range? I am not saying that Tate would have done it, but I have faith that Tate CAN do it since he has done it before. No offense to Robinson, but he ran that 2 minute drill exactly as I expected him to.
by tbliggins on Oct 11, 2009 1:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to say
Michigan gave Iowa their best shot. Young team, etc. You guys have a lot of good football to look forward to in the next few years. But watching what Michigan put on the field, they were playing HARD. Mistakes were made, but it wasn’t for lack of effort. It was a classic big ten football game.
As far as turnovers, Iowa has picked up 15 turnovers on the season. There’s a point where you have to stop saying something is “unearned” or “luck” and give the people making those plays a bit of credit. Granted there were some bad throws and Forcier’s horrible fumble (IIRC you had a slot who was “covered” by a safety 15 yards off the LOS and Forcier made the right audible to a hot read but then got a little excited trying to make the quick throw)… but, someone in black and gold still had to come up with the ball. Which is what we’ve been doing all year, allowing us to be in the black in turnover ratio despite Stanzi’s consistent pick sixes.
Good luck on the rest of the season, it was a great game (which is something we Hawkeyes ascribe to any time we beat Blue). Beat OSU, everyone hates the sweater vest.
Brunettes not fighter jets
by rockyh on Oct 11, 2009 4:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
At the time,
like no doubt pretty much everyone else, I thought Tate at 50% of what he is capable of would have been a better choice for the final drive, largely because Denard simply hasn’t thrown the ball enough to be ready to do what needed to be done. I mean, he clearly has a decent arm but he only has 15 career passing attempts (including Iowa), with maybe 5 [?] downfield. That’s just not enough with the game on the line.
I thought the last touchdown drive was brilliant — the only way that happens is by running like they did. Going into hurry-up-and-throw clock-management mode pretty much guarantees the drive stalls out, no matter who is throwing the passes. By running, Iowa was off balance the whole way.
The upside is we can play with anyone. Period. I agree with the Iowa fans that the Hawkeyes had something to do with the turnover margin, but I’ll say it now — assuming Molk returns for Penn State, and barring injury to any of any one of about 9 crucial players, 10-2 is a real possibility. It’s not something I would bet on, but it’s also not a total mirage. The defense showed once again that if the offense plays well, we can win. Maybe not pretty, but win nonetheless. Knock on wood. [Seriously — do it now!]
by Rasmus on Oct 12, 2009 7:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like your enthusiasm, but there hasn’t been a game so far in the season that the team has really put all phases of the game together. Yeah, you could say it happened against Western Michigan, but whenever one side of the ball plays well, the other seems to lack. I’m still predicting 7-8 wins.
Tate needs to start stretching the field with some deep passes, and not look to run so much. i think that will open things up a little more with the running game and the short-passing game.
Also, the defense is actually improving. You can see it every game. My hats off to Greg Robinson for the job he’s doing with little depth, youth, and walk-ons playing.
by JC314 on Oct 12, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Teams ...
do NOT have players drop balls – Odoms & Warren (both had good games) but BOTH DROPPED easy balls and Mathews punt drop was simply pathetic ! Warren’s drop REALLY hurt because it also may have affected the way Iowa would have called the rest of the game. Mathews is back there for ONLY 1 reason – to catch punts – otherwise Odoms or Stonum would be back on punts. Yeah TF & DR made bad reads … but they are freshman and they will learn.
Yes – lots of positives, but this team needs everyone to make the ordinary routine plays EVERY TIME … like GOOD TEAMS DO !!!
by Indiana Blue on Oct 12, 2009 9:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
All in for Michigan
Let me start by saying that I am a firm believer that we will ultimately “get there” under the new coaching regime and I am fully supportive of the changes which Coach Rod has brought to the program.
However, one of the things which I was surprised (and slightly disappointed) to see, was the number of times which Coach was shown chewing off the heads of our players. This is a young squad and they are bound to make mistakes. Considering the hostile environment they are playing in, I don’t think that him ripping off their heads in front of national television did much good to the players in terms of motivation or confidence.
The second thing which had me yelling “nooooooo” in my head, was the “controversial” decision at the end of the game. Tate may have been out of sorts Saturday and if he was hurting or if he had done something to warrant a benching for the final drive, I would be behind Coach Rod in that. But fact of the matter is, Denard did not seem comfortable running the two minute drill and did not appear to be hustling the offence along well. At the final drive, the game was on the line. With my extremely limited knowledge of football, I would think that only a quarterback who understood the offence and had the necessary time / clock management skills, would be able to lead a team down the field with less than 2 minutes to go. It all comes down to putting the players in a position where they can succeed. As dynamic as Denard can be, he is just not polished enough to accomplish the task, yet.
I urge all Wolverine faithful who bleed maize and blue like me, to continue to support the team and our players. Our coaches are human too. They too, can make mistakes and could also be subjected to the effects of their personal emotions. Stay behind the team. All in for Michigan.
Go Blue!
by GoBlue4ever on Oct 12, 2009 10:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
On Rodriguez yelling at players on the sidelines
Get used to it — it’s not going to change — that’s his coaching style. The players know that and expect it. Notice that most of the time the appropriate assistant coach is standing right there — Rodriguez makes his point and then leaves the rest to the assistant. It looks like an established technique to me.
by Rasmus on Oct 12, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um, SCM?
I’m not saying the turnovers didn’t matter, and I’m not in any way immune from writing the “we beat ourselves with stupid errors, you’re welcome [insert team here, usually Northfuckingwestern]” post.
With that said, Iowa outgained Michigan (not by a lot, but it’s not like the offense was completely shut down). While the Iowa running game was held to a season-low, it clicked along in the second half, when it became essential to bleeding the clock and running up a 4:30 TOP advantage. And, though some of the turnovers were unforced, Forcier got the hook as much for that Pryor-like 8/19, 94 yard line through 3 1/2 quarters and complete inability to convert a third down. That wasn’t just dropped passes or self-inflicted screwups.
If you can find a safety or two, I’m genuinely terrified of your team in two years. They will get there, but not quite yet.
Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.
by Hawkeye State on Oct 12, 2009 3:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Iowa's 2nd half ?
Hawkeye State – in the second half Michigan ran something like 37 plays to Iowa’s 27. Iowa’s longest “drive” of the 2nd half was 6 plays and gained a grand total of 13 yards & the ONLY touchdown of the 2nd half was a 1 play drive. Iowa failed to score any points when given a 12 yard field. TOP was Michigan 18 min. vs Iowa 12 min. in the 2nd half. Turnovers determined the outcome in this game – I dare say that if Iowa loses the turnover battle against Wisconsin this week on a 5 – 1 ratio – then Iowa loses by at least 20. Enjoy the win (Iowa’s 11th in the entire series)… U of M didn’t play up to their potential …. as a Michigan fan I am still waiting for the consistency that we need make it to the next level – which IMO – a level that the current Hawkeye team isn’t even close to.
by Indiana Blue on Oct 13, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hold on a second
“I guarantee some Iowa fan will wax poetic about how their defense caused the benching of Tate Forcier… which is patently wrong.”
Wait, didn’t Forcier leave because of a concussion?
by Guancous on Oct 12, 2009 5:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No
Richrod did not know about the concussion until after the game. AppRently it happened at the beginning of the fourth quarter, but by that time Robert had already been bitchmadeby the Iowa D. He is so small, and he runs so much, I can see him suffering a lot more of those. I hope not though because he is fun to watch. Too bad he didn’t take the Iowa offer.
And you can take that to the bank.
by Hawkeye X on Oct 13, 2009 12:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













