Maize n Brew: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

Growing Pains: Michigan Football Falls to Iowa 28-30

When I saw a clearly distraught Denard Robinson collapse onto David Moosman following Michigan's fifth and final turnover Saturday night, my frustration and anger disappeared. I simply couldn't be angry or disappointed anymore.  After years of watching Michigan, sometimes emotionlessly, drop close games, I've been programmed to go into a deep funk lasting several days. I'd watch Henne, Brady, Navarre, Henson, or whomever else slowly walk off the field  unbuckling their chinstraps with their heads down or stare onto the field in a vacant trace with mouth wide open search for something to say. It was business. It was over. Onward to the next game, meeting, scrimmage, etc. It's over. Move forward.

This was something new to me. I saw a small glimpse of it last week when Tate Forcier threw what in hindsight was not a bad pass to a covered Marataveous Odoms. On the pattern, Odoms shirt was grabbed just as the ball left Forcier's hand, pulling him back and giving MSU's safety a slingshot towards the ball Odoms would normally have caught. When it was over and MSU hand come down with the ball, Tate lied there on the field turf, obviously upset with himself and distraught, until a hand from one of his linemen lifted him up. As if to say "Come on kid, we're with you."

But this week it truly set in. When Denard's final pass ended up in the wrong hands, though his eyes were obscured by the mask he wears everyday in practice and games, I knew they were filled with tears of regret and disappointment. Turning to his left, Robinson looked as though he was looking for a place to bury his head, to find a place for his own misery in that moment. This was new to me. This was not the vacant stare I remembered and the internalization of pain that I so often saw from Michigan's quarterbacks. Robinson was visibly crushed by his mistake. And as the freshman turned to either collapse or stumble off to the sideline, David Moosman was there to hold him up.

In that moment of disappointment, this Michigan team became something more than wins and losses.

Star-divide

Over the past several years Michigan has been a collection of superbly talented individuals that sometimes played as a team. Henne. Hart. Edwards. Manningham. Terrell. Harris. Woodley. All talented young men who stood out and above. This is not that generation of players. No one on this team can transcend the team itself. And no one seems to want to. For all the nonsense this team, coaching staff and individual players have dealt with this season and last, this is the closest I've ever seen a Michigan team. And no amount of second guessing is going to change that.

Look no further than Moosman. David Moosman's playing days at this level, possibly at the next, are numbered. He could have, should have, been mad, angry, or consumed by some emotion other than compassion. This was the second straight week that an interception had ended a Michigan comeback attempt. Michigan had outgained and largely outplayed Iowa to that point without Tate and Denard's turnovers Michigan likely would've emerged victorious. But there wasn't the slightest hint of that coming from Moosman. He picked his quarterback up just like a big brother aiding his younger. He was there for his teammate.

This team is fine. Please. Please. Please. Don't look for reasons to pick it apart. Like it or not this is part of the process. The growing pains we all knew would eventually come. Don't delude yourself into thinking otherwise.

Much has been made of Forcier's benching at the end of the fourth quarter. I'll say this right now: it was the right decision. Forcier was absolutely awful on Saturday night. If you believe he was going to win that game, you're fooling yourself. He wasn't. Hopeless 40 yard chuck after hopeless 40 yard chuck, it was obvious the kid was rattled and totally lost as to what he was supposed to be doing.

I'll say this too, it's natural. It's supposed to happen. No one becomes a savior overnight. Tim Tebow had his growing pains. Sam Bradford and Colt McCoy were both wallopped too. Look at Henne and Brady. These things happen when freshmen start ballgames at quarterback. Occasionally they melt down. This was one of those occasions. When I saw a clearly razed and befuddled Tate Forcier wander back to sidelines after throwing three straight WTF passes from his own endzone, I knew his night was over. Denard Robinson was the right call. He was accurate and athletic leading a critical drive in the final quarter, and frankly was a misread away from doing what Tate had done two games previously. Robinson has done it in high school. Robinson will do it in college. Saturday was simply not his time.

Several months ago, looking at the upcoming season, I wrote the following about the Iowa game:

A win at Michigan State (regardless of our record) and everyone on the Maize n Blue bandwagon will be going out of their mind. We'll overlook all kinds of problems and flaws, because we won, and because of that we'll now expect to beat anyone on our schedule. Conversely, a loss at Michigan State and everyone will expect this to be the big rebound game, despite the fact it's AT Iowa.

Folks, this team isn't there yet. They are not world beaters yet. The scalps on their belt are WMU, EMU, Indiana and a vastly overrated Notre Dame squad. This is not the finished product.

Give it time. When the growing pains subside, you'll understand that this is all part of the process.

0 recs  |  Comment 15 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Well put (mostly)...

…but other Michigan fans would do well to take your words seriously. I know this is new to MU, but the year after a team goes 3-9 they gel better and are a closer team. I know this is new territory for most MU fans, as it’s been, like, decades since y’all have had a losing season, but this is what almost every other team in the nation goes through every few years.
Now, I’m not all that surprised the Moosman was hugging DR, cause Moosman nearly longsnapped the game away against Indiana, and I’m sure someone was hugging him when the final “interception” occurred. But, you are right that this Michigan team is more of a team than most… I just wish that translated to your fans.
For most MU fans are insufferable even still. MU followers have been tough to deal with for years, but I assumed the 3-9 season would bring most of you back to earth, at least momentarily. Unfortunately, the first thing I saw when I fired up Maize & Brew was that Michigan beat Michigan and in reading the post I found out that William & Mary’s could have shown up Saturday night and it wouldn’t have made any difference, because the only reason Michigan lost was because of Michigan (which I would have agreed with following the Indiana loss cardiac arrest game, but a pattern seems to be emerging, and the pattern seems to be that Michigan gets beat a lot, but against bad teams it doesn’t matter as much).

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 12, 2009 1:54 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I do have to say...

…that I’m tired of the MU apologists and their lame excuses. All I ever hear about Hawk fans is that we constantly think we are better than we are. That may be true, but we know when we’ve been beat, and aren’t ashamed to admit it.
Someone needs to tell SCM that football is a team sport, and you can’t just say, “Well we would have won if X didn’t play so shitty.” Two weeks ago all I heard about the QBForcier was “OMG! He’s the tit-balls!” (I have no idea what that means.)
I mean, look, some of your players didn’t have their best game- – that’s football. Bulaga for Iowa didn’t look to be 100% either, but no one at Iowa is saying, “OMG! If all our players played their best we would have won by 50!” That’s just not how it works. I know SCM is a UM fan, so he isn’t well versed in reality, but Tate fumbled because his hands were ice blocks (just like everyone else who didn’t have winter gloves on- – my hands are actually all cracked to shit from clapping, and in the 4th quarter they actually started to bleed… if that gives you any indication of how moisture-thiefing cold it was), but everyone else on the field had ice for hands too.
Don’t you realize the running game was there for you (when we hadn’t given up a rush TD in 33 qtrs, and rarely give up over 100 yds) because we gave it to you and dared your frosh QB (on the road in the cold) to beat us with his (bum) arm? Don’t you realize that our D-Line wasn’t getting the punishing penetration that it usually does because our ends were more about containment (we stole this from Ark St) on Saturday (and it’s not like they rack up the sacks anyway). We gave up the run down the middle (where our LBs could make tackles before you got more than 12 yds- – eliminating the big run play while forcing your scrambling QBs to stay in the pocket where they are less than stellar). On DR’s drive (yes he was good at what he did, but) our DCoach used prevent D to conceed the run up the middle, which kept the clock a tic-tic-tickin.
This year’s Iowa squad is about calculated risk. This year’s Iowa squad are a bunch of hard workers who do what is asked of them. Your Michigan squad would do well to take notes. We don’t have the elite guys that MU gets, but we play as a team, and that’s what keeps getting the wins. It’s never pretty. They just do what they need to do to win.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 12, 2009 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Iowa won

Iowa won the game. After an inauspicious first drive, Stanzi marched the field on us and converted key 3rd downs. That extremely long conversion he threw toward Donovan Warren was a perfect, perfect throw. This is the best defense in the Big 10 outside of Columbus, and performed incredibly by forcing turnovers (no, when Brandon Minor fumbles it isn’t a random occurance; it’s Pat Angerer raking the ball out of his hands) and playing disciplined football in the running and throwing lanes on every down.

BUT you are telling a series of just-so stories about our offensive performance, and it’s just a bit disingenuous. It is undoubtedly true that Parker gameplanned well, and things certainly worked out in Iowa’s favor. BUT we were down two and driving for a go-ahead field goal when our (already bad) luck ran out. Are you really trying to argue that Parker went into the locker room and congratulated your ferocious front seven for surrending nearly two hundred yards on the ground and three touchdowns, because that’s just what he wanted them to do when Michigan ran the ball?

You have an elite defense, and it won Iowa the game with outstanding, opportunistic play which was good enough for keeping Michigan’s offense from scoring more points than its Iowa counterpart. On the ground, Michigan succeeded against the Iowa defense better than any opponent has since Arkansas State, or maybe since Illinois. It lost the game because Iowa is a good team, and because it is not as good a team as Iowa. I think both statements can be true: Michigan’s offense succeeded on the ground, and nearly won; Iowa’s defense succeeded where it counts, in scoring defense, and won the game for its team because that team deserved to.

by YpsiTerrier on Oct 12, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not what I was saying...

…I actually held my tongue quite a bit there, cause I came very close to comparing y’all to (T)osu fans after reading the SCM post. I mean, Saturday night’s game was just another well fought (if not always well played) football game. If Michigan had won, I wouldn’t have had a bad thing to say because you came at us like Michign always comes at us.
All I was saying, was that it’s lame to say that Michigan would have won were it not for Michigan beating itself (and I agree with your counterargument- – as a fan I was hoping Norm Parker knew what the hell he was doing, but as the game progressed it became evident that it was part of the gameplan… and yes, with a couple big runs that plan could have imploded and we could have lost, but alas, as you pointed out the D stepped up, and Michigan’s biggest run play was 12 yards… a.k.a. the plan worked- – though I would have been happier if we could have stuffed the run better).
I have no beef with your post, as you seem fairly level headed and like you understand the game. Rather, my beef was with fans like SCM who just can’t call it what it is. I mean, ferchristsakes, we only win one out of every five times we play you, all I ask is a little humility when we win, and I was saying kudos to your post for such humility. I understand it sucks to be on the losing end (I’m reminded 4 out of every 5 times we meet), but you need the down times to get/enjoy the good, and that’s a lesson Michigan fans have been getting the hard way.
However, it’s like I was telling a couple Michigan fans coming out of the stadium Sat. night, it’s not like Michigan won’t be kicking ass on everyone in a year or two, so just hang in there. Maybe Moosman will hug everyone before it’s all over.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 12, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who the hell is MU?

Sorry, I couldn’t get past that to read the rest of your post.

GO BLUE! http://www.maizenbrew.com/

by SCM on Oct 12, 2009 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry...

…it’s just what I hear Michigan fans call the school. Granted, none of them have actually attended college… or been to the state of Michigan… so that could have something to do with it.

Michigan fans should send out a pamphlet (or set up a web site) so you can all coordinate your efforts, figure out what to call yourselves, share insider Real Estate info with DickRod, etc.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 12, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

MU???

Perhaps you should log onto ESPN.com or SI.com sometime. The abbreviation, “UM,” has only been around over 100 years. Oh well, I’ll just keep my expectations of an Iowa grad to a minimum. You did graduate (from a college), right?

by Goblue88 on Oct 14, 2009 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry SCM...

…I couldn’t read that. I looked, and tried, but all I got out of it was the sound of a gigantic “DOUCHE!”

Does SCM stand for South Columbus Michigan-fan? Cause I definitely detect a hint of Sweatervest when you write.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 13, 2009 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

um

So you are saying that Iowa tried to force Michigan to pass by allowing Michigan to run it down their throats? I wouldn’t continue that strategy much longer.

by maizeguy on Oct 12, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, we TRIED to get Michigan to pass...

…but your QBForce kind of screwed that up.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 13, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

That’s just a joke. I’m full of piss and vinegar today. Like I said before, Michigan played a good game. Good luck with the rest of the season.
I hope you do well. That way next year you’ll be preseason ranked at #8 or so, and it will be fun trying to knock y’all off in the big house.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 13, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

I was saying that by giving y’all the middle of the field and taking away the sidelines we were eliminating the big play. Tate couldn’t scramble, receivers were more covered than usual because we weren’t throwing a bunch of guys in the box (How often were our LBs defending your slot receivers, shadowing them all over the field?), which of course left the inside running game wide open.
But Michigan usually (and seemingly moreso this yer than most) lives by the big play. Your QBs would have had to make a play with their arm rather than causing confusion with a lot of outside-the-pocket stuff, which often leads to a breakdown in the D, and allows the big play. It was a gamble by Norm Parker, but it was a calculated one considering frosh Tate was in a hostile road game in freezing temperatures (which obviously came into play with the “whoops-where’d-it-go” fumble). We took away his comfort area (the scramble) and made him be a true QB or run up the middle where most of the Hawks could crash together- – which took away the big play.
It’s not a strategy I expect to see a lot of (it seemed pretty specific to Michigan), but we’ve seen so many different types of spread now, I don’t think it matter anymore.
Again, good luck to you all for the rest of the season. I enjoy your site, and can’t wait for Hate Week next year.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Oct 13, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"28-30"?

What are you, my mom giving me a score?

[insert prophetic yet obnoxiously haughty and annoying quote here]

by J Money BS on Oct 12, 2009 4:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What?
This was something new to me. I saw a small glimpse of it last week when Tate Forcier threw what in hindsight was not a bad pass to a covered Marataveous Odoms. On the pattern, Odoms shirt was grabbed just as the ball left Forcier’s hand, pulling him back and giving MSU’s safety a slingshot towards the ball Odoms would normally have caught.

The play in OT? You must be watching a different replay… Fortener had that read the whole way, had position, and simply ran past Odoms. There was no holding.

by Stuka on Oct 12, 2009 5:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What?

“I’d watch Henne, Brady, Navarre, Henson, or whomever else slowly walk off the field unbuckling their chinstraps with their heads down or stare onto the field in a vacant trace with mouth wide open search for something to say. It was business. It was over”

You can’t possibly be serious. If you are, nothing you could possibly write can have any credibility. We only now, after all these years, have a quarterback who cares? My God.

by Wolverine1969 on Oct 14, 2009 12:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An Unofficial Michigan Football Blog that Hits like Ezeh and is Smooth like Gibson.
Start posting about the Wolverines »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Markusr2007_small
Scout interview with QB Steven Threet at Arizona State
Small
What would Bo do?
Markusr2007_small
Somebody Please Convince Me Not To Read Rodriguez's Contract with Michigan
Maizenbrew_small
Anyone Want to do a Michigan Iowa Wrap-up?
Brando_small
Apparently Kohl Center Officiating Applies to Camp Randall Hockey...
Markusr2007_small
Jibreel Black Commits To Michigan
Small
Louis Bullock owning it in spain
Markusr2007_small
New UM Commit DE/OLB Davion "Too Tall" Rogers
Maizenbrew_small
Courtney Sims Out Of Work Again
Markusr2007_small
Gary Uberstine must be a genius.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

40865_sec_mississippi_st_kentucky_basketball_small +2 updates

Selection Sunday 2010: As Exciting As An Itinerary Can Get

Sam Houston's Gilberto Clavell, right, shoots a jump hook over Stephen F. Austin's Mark Gomillia in the first half during an NCAA college basketball game at the Southland Conference Championship, Saturday, March 13, 2010. (AP Photo/Bob Levey)

Sam Houston State Wins Southland; Prevents Stephen F. Austin Repeat

Temple's Ramone Moore, right, drives around Richmond's Ryan Butler (44) during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game at the Robins Center in Richmond, Va., Saturday, Feb. 6, 2010. (AP Photo/Clement Britt) +1 updates

Temple Edges Richmond 56-52 To Win Third Straight Atlantic 10 Title

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Maizenbrew_small Maize n Brew Dave

Editors

James_dean_smiling2_small Beauford

Authors

Small mzgoblue

Brando_small SCM

Mhn_standalone_puckw_small MHNet

Official Partner of CBS Sports