Maize n Brew: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

A Win, A Win, My Kingdom For A Win...

First off, apologies for the deleted threads, basically there was nothing of value being stated in the most recent one, and the game thread had digressed to caps-lock explicatives from yours truly, and really, there's just not much to gleam from that is there?  Anyways, discretion being the better part of valor, I decided to try to calm down a bit before putting some thoughts together here.  Let's just get this out of the way first: that was an appalling loss.  Appalling is at least in the correct ball-park I'd say, and it's not a four-letter word, so we'll go with that.  I have no doubt that this team was trying their best out there (how else do you block a punt when you're down by three scores late in the game)?  I'm not going to question their heart either, they are out their busting their tails day in and day out, so to question their desire, etc is just wrong if you ask me.  Let's steer clear of that shall we?  Anyways, this was an Illinois team that was outright horrible coming into this game; in every measurable statistic they were horrible.  We made them look out-freakin-standing from the start of the second half onward.  I mean, well, words still fail me even now to be honest.  Now then, let's also get something else out of the way: there are clear and obvious deficiencies on this Michigan football team.  That said, this was not only a winnable game but one we controlled for the first 30 minutes (aside from Illinois first drive, I believe they had 12 yards in the first half), and had an opportunity to put into firm grasp at the start of the 3rd quarter.  This brings me to coaching concern numero uno.

The goal-line stand - Have you ever seen such a punctuated drastic change in a football game with so much time left?  The worst part was that somewhere in the back of my head, when Roundtree was caught on the one I thought to myself "oh no"...  I hate that portion of my brain, the worrisome/mettlesome portion that makes me worry about things like picking up a simple yard for a score.  Now then, what followed falls entirely at the feet of the coaches.  You have a senior tailback who has worked his tail off to be a part of this football team in a limited role, he has fulfilled what was asked of him to continue to be a member of this team and did so in a manner that enabled him to be a captain today.  Kevin Grady needed to see the football four times on the one yardline.  He didn't even see the field.  How do you NOT stay in your spread and pound the football with Grady?  If you decide to forego that option, then you absolutely MUST tell Tate to keep the football if he sees a gap in the D-line (like the CHASM that was present on second down).  This was an enormous gaff that completely deflated this Michigan football team and gave Illinois life when they had done nothing all day.  This was easily the biggest turning point of the football game and it falls squarely on Coach Rodriguez and his offensive staff.  Everything else that happened can be traced back to the failure of the Michigan offense to pick up a TD from one yard away.

The Read Option - Juice Williams has been anywhere from god-awful to atrocious this season, we  made him look like a Heisman contender (again).  Is it not concerning to anyone else that we were torched by plays that this defense essentially sees every single day in practice?  How hard is it to tell your defenders to hit the QB every time, you plant him every single time whether he pitches it or keeps it, you drill him.  Our linebackers and safeties were so out of position and so confused as to what was going on that we made a horrifying offense look like a well oiled machine.  Again, I don't have solutions on defense, but I at least have some suggestions:

  1. Switch up the safeties.  Whomever, however you do it, I don't care, but give someone else a shot.  Mike Williams is simply not getting the job done right now.  I don't know if it's coaching or just a lack of recognition on individual players' parts, but on nearly every single big play, there's Williams nowhere close to the play or taking an angle that puts him so far away from the action that you wonder what it is, exactly, that he's keying on.  I'm not calling out the young man for the sake of jollies here, I'm sure he's out there playing his tail off, but he's not getting the job done and its been big time play after big time play as a result.
  2. This team is still not tackling, it's more like they're hanging on and eventually dragging someone down.  However you have to address this, do it.  This team isn't wrapping up  and they aren't stopping people on first contact.  This is not exactly a new issue with Michigan defenses, but it certainly seems to be one that is the most directly addressable via practice and coaching... it doesn't take 5 star talent to know how to make a solid tackle.  Basic fundamentals.  If you don't have the talent to be proficient in complex schemes, you absolutely MUST be sound in the fundamentals, we are not.  I fully understand that we have a talent deficit on defense, but that doesn't mean that these guys aren't capable of playing competent very basic defensive football, you know, tackling.   
  3. Our linebackers continue to look lost, Ezeh and Mouton continue to really take puzzling angles and again are slow to fill holes.  How many times did we have an LB literally stand next to Williams trying to figure out if he still had the ball or not... HIT HIM, IT'S FOOTBALL!!!  We're dying for any kind of consistency from this spot on the roster, we've gotten none so far this year.

Down three scores with time left -  Michigan drives down and, while I agree that a TD would've been huge, a FG puts you within 15 and lots of time to play.  I don't understand essentially putting the game on the line right there.  It sure would've been nice to have that FG on the board when we blocked that punt wouldn't it?  Sure I know it likely doesn't make a difference in the outcome, but that's not why I bring this up.  I find it concerning because this is again on coaching and game management.  You're sending a message to your team there by not kicking the FG on 4th and goal from the 10, and at that time, it's the wrong kind of message.  One of the greatest comebacks in Michigan history started with a FG you may recall (down 17 with 7 minutes to go against MSU in '04).  You need three scores, you take a score however you can get it if you ask me.

End of the 1st half -  Really the fist half was dominated by Michigan in every aspect except the scoreboard.  The defense did a nice job holding them to 3 and out at the end of the half and Michigan had two timeouts left.  Rather than using one to keep approximately one minute on the clock about to receive the ball, instead Rodriguez let the clock run down and simply ran out the half after the punt...  Since when is that this staff's MO?  Again, what kind of message are you sending there?  Why go to the half quietly with a timeout in your pocket when you had a chance to score and get the ball to start the 3rd?

Star-divide

Have to reel in Tate - Tate Forcier is a freshman, this is obvious and has been repeated ad nauseum, but it needs to be stressed to a young guy that you do not try to make up a deficit in one play.  You could see as the game went on that Tate started bypassing open underneath receivers trying to hit the big play, he waited longer in the pocket, scrambled around more opening himself to hits and consequently fumbles, and it hurt his team.  At a time when there was time to simply continue running the offense, you absolutely have to pull your young QB aside and get him focused on what you have to do.  The turnovers aren't on coaching, but some of the situations that lead to them could've been prevented by keeping your young guys heads in the game.  This will improve with experience and maturity, but it'd be nice to see Tate keeping within the offense a little more in these kind of situations rather than forcing it.

Redzone - Dude, seven trips inside the 20 and 13 points???????????

Measurable progress -  The Notre Dame game was, is, and will continue to be a big win for this football team.  That said, every other team we lost to last year we've again lost to this year.  That's troubling.  It's hard to argue that any of these teams are markedly better than they were last season (Illinois is considerably worse), but I find it concerning that within the conference our team has not improved in the slightest from last season relative to its competition.  I fully understand that this is a better football team than the 2008 Michigan squad, but that doesn't much matter if you aren't winning games.  So yes, count me at least slightly worried here, especially since Ron Zook (who cannot coach himself out of a paper bag) has taken us to the woodshed twice now, and this time with a downright bad football team.

Now then, there are many in the fanbase who are clamoring to say "everyone got too excited after starting 4-0, etc, etc, etc".  I disagree.  I mean sure there were some eccentrics out there who proclaimed an improbable run after the first four weeks that was way premature, but let's not pretend those four games were some kind of mirage either.  This team played at a level in those football games that it simply was not capable of last year.  Unfortunately, short of the Iowa game, we have not seen that level of play again since.  Many of the familiar unforced errors and turnovers have crept back into the fold, and we've struggled mightily since.  Now then, let's lay some facts out there before we get all huffy about Coach Rodrguez:

  • This team has absolutely no defense, this the result of many factors: attrition, lack of solid defensive recruiting at key positions, lack of development of key prospects at key spots, and a lack of a solid base in fundamentals.  This team has an outstanding defensive line and nothing else, it's a shame because we're watching one of the great DE's we've ever had have to play through this.  But look, this team is starting two former walkons right now... at Michigan, has that ever happened before?  Seriously, ever?  We're at a talent low on defense that is easily comparable to what we saw on offense last season.  
  • Yes, it has been said a million times, let's say it again: this team is being operated by a freshman quarterback.  An improvement over last season in terms of talent, certainly, but still an inexperienced freshman who has made his share of freshman mistakes this season.  Tate is trying to do too much at times now, and it's on the staff to get him back on track because when he sticks to the offense, things certainly have a propensity to click.  
  • Even with a freshman QB and our best lineman out for the season, this offense is capable of great things, not always consistently, but certainly more than we ever saw last season.  There have been many streaks of brilliance there this year punctuated by periods of just flummoxing incompetence.  Call it growing pains, I know it doesn't make it any easier to tolerate, but just realize that there has been definitive and noticeable improvement on that side of the football.
  • This isn't measurable, but seriously, we cannot buy a break over these past several games.  Once again we caught a team with 13 men on the field when we snapped the ball and it wasn't called... it's a clear rule and an easy call...  Beauford and I talked a bit about how if the officials aren't calling that stuff then maybe we shouldn't be trying so hard to catch teams like that, but after more thought I have a hard time not getting really angry that this team is doing things like that and not getting the calls.  I want us to push the tempo, I want us to catch teams off-guard, I want us to play in a way that has the defense getting caught in those kinds of positions.  To not get those calls is a joke.  Also, another holding call on this offense the second the ball is snapped... which, really?

There will undoubtedly be many threads dedicated to Rodriguez's future this week, to which I sigh mostly.  I understand that people are angry and are looking for explanations.  I also understand that there will be some epic hyperbole about expecations, tradition, and how things are done-round-these-parts type of stuff that will make me weep softly inside for the good of humankind.  Rodriguez deserves some criticism, but that's not to say he deserves to be treated as though he's a bumbling idiot who has put this team in this position all on his own.  I simply cannot ignore the fact that Rodriguez has succeeded before, yes I know it was in the Big East, whatever, he's an experienced guy who had his teams performing at an elite level when he left.  That doesn't just all disappear now that he's in Ann Arbor rather than Morgantown.  Again that fact does not place him above criticism either, it does not mean that he still shouldn't face some tough questioning after performances like this.  I said previously that this game falls largely at the feet of Rodriguez and the staff and I firmly believe that... but let's remember this is year two.  A program is not built in two years, nor is it built in three years.  It takes time.  Look at our defense for god's sake, there are issues there that are only going to be improved with recruiting at this point.  There are other issues that are going to improve with experience (QB).  There are also issues, however, that have nothing to do with player personnel, and that's what's troubling: mistakes with the football, fundamental gaffs, a defense that looks lost against an offense it faces day in and day out, etc.

Improvement needs to be seen though, and for the first time in Rodriguez's tenure I'm concerned about the lack of improvement against known competition.  A bowl game should have been assured by a 4-0 start.  This team should have handled a terrible Illinois team today.  After tough losses to MSU and Iowa, the team really gassed it against Penn State.  All of these losses were explainable and/or understandable in some way, also obviously frustrating/concering, but at least understandable.  We then were looking at playing the worst two teams in the conference in Illinois and Purdue with a chance to stretch to 7-3 heading into the final two games of the season.  Michigan's failure to get the job done today, let alone how it happened, has caused me to worry about where this team is for the first time in Rodriguez's tenure.  A loss to Purdue next week would present the very real possibility that Michigan could finish the year 1-7 over its last eight games and miss a bowl for the second straight year...  this is something that I don't think anyone would swallow easily and that's putting it lightly.  I'm of the firm belief that it would ludicrous to give Rodriguez anything short of four years here, he's just now getting the opportunity to fill the offense with players he has recruited, and on defense we aren't even close to reaching that point.  It is going to take time, which is something everyone needs to understand.  It's not a simple question of just tweaking one thing or another schematically in the long haul, it's a question of bringing in talent.  Of course my opinion on the matter means nothing and I'm not sure how those whose opinions do matter approach these kind of things.  

It sure seemed like the initial game-plan was there today: Brown had 25 carries in a game where we were all begging for our backs to touch the ball more.  We utlized a lot of quick throws and reads and generally dominated the first half everywhere except where it matters most: the score.  Then the execution went away, there were some tremendous errors in in-game management in my opinion, and it all fell apart at the worst possible time.  I'm concerned about how this team seemed to lose its composure again, I'm concerned that nine games into this season they're making mistakes that they were not making in the first four weeks.  No matter how you slice it, some of it (a lot of it) falls on coaching in some way or another.  I'm concerned because this football team with the same players has played much, much, much better football this year than what we've seen over the past month.

I do think we can say the following:

  • Missing a bowl this season should be viewed very poorly after a 4-0 start... "epic collapse" would describe it aptly.
  • Despite the hot start, I'm starting to have some trepidation about where this team will advance to next season due to a combination of both schedule and the fact that our defense is losing its best player(s?) and what exactly do we have waiting for us in the wings on that side of the ball?  A major revamp needs to occur on defense prior to next year.
  • A win against Purdue would certainly stem the tide of woe-is-us worrying that will undoubtedly hit a fever-pitch this week to the point that this team might be able to find its bearings heading into Wisconsin and Ohio State... it's sad to say, but 7-5 would now be an enormous victory given where we are now.
  • These next three weeks will likely go a long way to determining just how much slack Rodriguez has going forward.  A win against OSU, no matter how unlikely that appears right now, cures many ills.  That said, if Tressel and company watch this tape, they may not even have Pryor throw a pass when they come to Ann Arbor (you think I'm kidding?).
  • Saying "this team just isn't that good" doesn't explain a loss like this, and frankly ignores large portions of how this team has played throughout the year.  This team isn't consistent in any way, but they are not 2008 either.  This team is more than capable of winning football games, particularly against these kind of teams.  Lack of execution is not the same as "just not very good".

So here we are, I'm not happy, you're not happy either, but there's nothing we can do about it now.  This team has three opportunities to try to put a positive spin on a year that has been nothing if not completely up or completely down. Right now a bowl, ANY bowl, is the goal.  Accomplish that and move on.  I like Rodriguez, I think that he has the tools to succeed in a big way here, but I don't have any idea how the people who matter are going to continue to view this thing if we keep dropping games like this.  He deserves no less than four years at the helm, a rash decision before that leaves us in no better shape and possibly sets us back even further.  If we are to garner anything out of these last three weeks the coaches are going to have to work their tails off to get this team in position to win games.  It starts with Purdue next week, get it done.

0 recs  |  Comment 15 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

That was the worst game I ever attended.

Being from central IL, me and the pops go to every Michigan/Illinois game we can. Memorial Stadium has never let me down in my life. As much as Williams was running around not doing anything, Kouvacs was nearly ALWAYS in poor position, and lacks the athleticism to make up for the bad angles he takes.

Not only was Michigan teh suck in the 2nd half, but it was so cold it was uncomfortable. The wind was outrageous, and almost no one in the stands thought it would be so chilly. “Hey! The sun’s out and it’s 45, it’s going to be NICE!”

Anyway, it was very, very depressing watching Tate make zone reading mistakes constantly. We also have 3 blocked punts in as many weeks, and out of those 3 blocks, we’ve scored 7 points. That’s a terrible and telling number right there.

by ScooterMagruder on Nov 1, 2009 8:49 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Well put

That was a very good post. I agree w/ most of your thoughts. It is very disconcerting that we are regressing on defense (from a poor starting place) and that the offense only executes in spurts. Sure there are excuses for somethings, but to have 2 consecutive noncompetitive blowouts this far into the season is frustrating for everyone. It is perfectly acceptable to doubt/criticize RR, but he absolutely should not be fired. Every time I read that I die a little inside.

by tbliggins on Nov 1, 2009 2:06 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

This wasn't Penn State

This is more like Iowa and MSU — a game that shoulda coulda woulda been won.

For me, it falls on the offense. The defense is doing the best it can. It was clear from those first four games that to keep winning, points would have to be scored. I, like a lot of people, thought that would happen. Losing Molk was big, big, big, but the most disappointing thing for me has been the quarterback play. I don’t feel strongly about Robinson — all of his mistakes have been “teachable moments.” But Forcier is another story. I can’t help thinking something is wrong there. I wonder about the future with him at the helm. He doesn’t seem to be improving. Indeed, his decisions seem to be regressing.

Put it this way — right or wrong, I’m like 400% happier when I see Denard on the field. I don’t care if he throws it to the other team — I’m confident he’ll learn from those mistakes. The offense seems energized, with a clear sense of purpose, when he’s on the field. Tate, on the other hand, just seems in over his head. The offense always seems to start strong — the players are focused at the start of the game. [The same thing applies to late drives in close games — focus is not a problem then.] But once things start getting confusing, leadership from the quarterback makes all the difference. I just don’t see that from Tate. It’s certainly not for want of trying of lack of desire — but I think there’s a cold observation that has to be made at some point.

by Rasmus on Nov 2, 2009 7:46 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I feel exactly the opposite

I just don’t see Denard ever being a great QB at UM. He can’t throw at all, and makes terrible decisions when he does throw. This could be my bias against watching Michigan turn into a running team, I really don’t want to see that. I know everyone has been clamoring for the re-birth of Pat White, but I am not on board with that. I always hated watching teams like Nebraska run a gimmick option offense, and I don’t see the running spread any differently. Its just the option offense at a faster pace from a shotgun formation. I see that as an offense that should be run by teams that need to trick opponents because of a talent/size deficiency, like Air Force or Navy. I am hoping to see an offense that looks a lot more like Oregon’s or even Oklahoma’s. I think Tate is capable of running an offense like that, he just needs time to get comfortable, but I am confident he will just get better and better, and if not I like what I am hearing about Gardner, more so than D-Rob.

I think its very hard to blame Tate for the way our O-Line is getting manhandled, and the many drops I am seeing. I can’t believe how many drops we have from our TE’s. I also would like to see us recruit a few more larger WR’s who can go up and make the big play, and give Tate a target when he’s in trouble. I still believe in this offense, but I like it much better w/ Tate or a throwing QB who is capabale of running when necessary, but not a run first pass 2nd QB.

Rox, please start playing with heart! Let's finish this thing off!

by smokinRox on Nov 3, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure how you can judge

Denard’s throwing, He has 22 attempts all season, never more than four in one game. There’s no way to develop any sort of rhythm or touch that way. Like I said, I don’t feel strongly about him. I haven’t seen him practice. I’d like to see what he could do with a first half, though, instead of the sticky situations he’s been thrown into.

But I am starting to develop a negative opinion of Tate’s play. Not to repeat what I said, but I guess it boils down to a sense that the things I’m seeing that I don’t like are the result of his being coached up the wazoo from 5th grade or whatever. I’m not confident at all that “he will just get better and better,” as you put it. My fear is that he’s not going to get better, that he’s already reached his potential. [I’ll be happy to be proven wrong.]

Note that I can say these things because I’m not Rich Rodriguez — if I’m him, I do exactly what he’s done — you have to give Tate a chance — Forcier gave the team its best shot to win this year. But I think next year is a different story.

by Rasmus on Nov 3, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think his potential has been reached as far as arm strength/touch is concerned

but at the QB position, the mental side is huge and there is a learning curve on that. He still doesn’t fully know the offense as well as he will in the next couple of years, and no matter how long you have been coached up, nothing can simulate game speed and 100,000 fans cheering against you, making noise, and generally making it tough to run an offense. I was watching the Iowa game and when they went to field level cams you could see the shaking and get more of a sense of how loud and disruptive it was. I think he can only improve in these 2 areas, understanding the offense and dealing w/ the game environment. He will have a whole new experience next year going to ND, Happy Valley, and the Shoe, which will make for a tough year on the road again, but by year 3 I think we will see a very good offense. I do mean year 3 for Tate, year 4 for RRod of course.

You’re right, we do have a very small sample size of throws from Denard, but he just doesn’t look sound in his throws and really doesn’t seem to have a ton of arm strength. The other thing I don’t like is when he goes back, he looks ready to run at the 1st sign of coverage on his primary receiver. I want to see the best QB on the field, and by QB I mean thrower, not runner, and if that turns out to be Denard than I am all for it.

Rox, please start playing with heart! Let's finish this thing off!

by smokinRox on Nov 5, 2009 9:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the thing...

You’re right about Tate and dealing with the game environment. He will get better at that.

But this exchange has prompted me to try to understand what is really bothering me about Forcier. Strangely enough, it’s your perspective that has made me see what I’ve missing in my thinking:

1. As any knowledgeable WVU fan will tell you, Rodriguez’s spread-option is primarily a running scheme. There is the threat to pass, but it is not a single-back, run-and-shoot passing spread. Far from it.

2. So I think the underlying reason I am more comfortable when Denard is in the game is precisely because it is a run-first offense when he’s in. That’s what it is designed to be. So it feels right.

3. As a result, I now think the roots of my uneasiness about Tate’s play and my lack of optimism about his ability to improve are to be found in exactly what you like about him — his strength and his training is as a passing quarterback for a spread offense. The problem is that he’s not playing in a spread — he’s playing in a spread-option, which is, at its core, a running offense. So unless Rodriguez can completely deprogram him and get him to think run first, the offense is going to continue to sputter with him at its helm.

by Rasmus on Nov 5, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree w/ all of this

I guess I was just hoping RRod would take the offense back to the offense that was at Tulane. When I hear things like he is watching tapes of OU and Oregon and talking to those coaches, it excites me a little to think of a pass spread attack. I like that more because it is a viable NFL offense as well, and the Pats have proven that. I feel like there is no such proof that a spread option would work at the NFL level, therefore it feels more like a gimmick offense. I guess I was just hoping a gimmick offense might be needed in a place w/ less talent available, but once he got to UM he would open it up a little and play a pass spread. I might be one of the few Mich fans hoping for that, but I just don’t like the option game, and I have to say it bores me a little. If UM wins, I will root for them no matter what, but along w/ winning I want to see a program that puts players in the NFL.

Rox, please start playing with heart! Let's finish this thing off!

by smokinRox on Nov 6, 2009 5:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I'm having a stupid attack...

but who’s the second walk on starting on defense?

by BSU_Alum07 on Nov 2, 2009 9:41 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Kevin Leach started in place of Ezeh vs Ill.

by tbliggins on Nov 2, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought Leach played well

he’s had 10+ tackles in each of his two starts this year. Yes, the other start was against EMU, but the kid is always around the ball.

by handsomerob1 on Nov 2, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh okay

Thanks, due to my work schedule I can’t watch the games and I didn’t bother to look at the player participation chart for this week.

by BSU_Alum07 on Nov 2, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not all coaching

This probably goes more to the fact that we just don’t have the talent on defense but from what I saw when I was watching the game (and the commentators talked about this as well) but GROB put the players in a position to make a tackle at the line of scrimmage on a number of plays but the Illinois player just ran around him (If I remember correctly this happened mostly to Williams and Stevie Brown). I say this just to say at some point it’s not on the coaches anymore but on the players to execute.

On offense, I think this happened at the end of the 3rd quarter, when we moved the ball down the field in 4 plays. Did anyone else see Dorrstein get plowed 8 yards back on that play and cause Brown to be tackled for an 8 yard loss? Never thought that was possible. I actually thought Omenah played well when he was in at RT and he is definitely the future.

All in all, I’m torn at this point if there should be whole sale changes with the lineup (Vlad, Fitzgerald, Omaneh, Barnum, Stokes, etc) since we really need to win this week. I’m guessing if we lose this coming Saturday we’ll see lots of changes the last 2 weeks. I do agree with you though that RRod should be given at least 4 years. I’ve seen a lot of improvement on offense and I think the D has potential if we keep GROB after this year and have some semblence of continuity on D in terms of coaches.

by Jason0830 on Nov 2, 2009 10:59 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

grob

im a current syracuse student and lifelong michigan fan. what i see this year with the michigan defense is exaclty what i saw with our defense the past four years under greg robinson. maybe im biased because the man ruined our program, but he is a mediocre coach and horrible motivator.
i think a lot of the blame being put on this defense needs to fall on his lap. thats just a bitter syracuse fan’s perspective.

Go Blue!

by nhcuse on Nov 2, 2009 5:33 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Just a thought...

I agree with most of your article. Especially, your points about not being able to punch it in with first and goal. Didn’t we see this with the Notre Dame game?

We march up the field with the spread option, then go into I- formation on the one yard line. Someone explain to me why you can’t run a spread option play on the one yard line.

Just a thought. Is it possible that the team has been worked too hard? The psychological collapse had to come from somewhere in the coaching process. Is the team wound too tight? It seems like Forcier has lost his carefree attitude.

I would appreciate anyone’s opinion who has played football. I only played tennis in high school, but I clearly remember losing games when I was trying too hard. Any one ever hear of “The Inner Game of Tennis?”

Thanks.

by Chicago Wolverine on Nov 2, 2009 10:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An Unofficial Michigan Football Blog that Hits like Ezeh and is Smooth like Gibson.
Start posting about the Wolverines »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Brando_small
Apparently Kohl Center Officiating Applies to Camp Randall Hockey...
Markusr2007_small
Jibreel Black Commits To Michigan
Small
Louis Bullock owning it in spain
Markusr2007_small
New UM Commit DE/OLB Davion "Too Tall" Rogers
Maizenbrew_small
Courtney Sims Out Of Work Again
Markusr2007_small
Gary Uberstine must be a genius.
Brando_small
You Stay Classy Lane!
Brando_small
Michigan catches FIRE to come back to beat Penn State!!!!
Maizenbrew_small
Call for Contributions
Small
RROD v Brian kelly next year...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Maizenbrew_small Maize n Brew Dave

Editors

James_dean_smiling2_small Beauford

Authors

Small mzgoblue

Brando_small SCM

Mhn_standalone_puckw_small MHNet

Official Partner of CBS Sports