You're On Your Own.
These past three years, barring some fleeting bright spots, have been unrelentingly painful for anybody who follows Michigan football with any kind of passion. For the first time in my life, I can honestly say that I look forward to watching the NFL on Sundays. I can't wait for basketball season to start. When was the last time you heard that from a Michigan fan? These last three years, I find myself asking why I care so much; why the damage total thus far is 1 cell phone, window blinds, a wine glass, angry downstairs neighbors, a frightened dog, and a spouse who has asked more than once "shouldn't this be fun?"
Shouldn't it be?
Writing about this team is hard - you may have noticed. Some of the apathy can be attributed to some personal changes that myself and Dave have been going through (all good things - not to worry), but some of it can be blamed on the simple fact that this isn't as fun as it used to be. Not the blogging, mind you, but the whole "being a Michigan football fan" part. As Brian at Mgoblog pointed out in his post-game bullets post, having a conversation about Michigan football these days in about as useful as slamming your head into a car door repeatedly. Painful at first, but soon there's just a swimming blackness as you bleed out. Unfortunately, that metaphor ends in death, and equally unfortunate is the fact that nearly every conversation I've had about Michigan football has had me wishing for it by the conclusion. Typically, they fall into four categories:
1) Sympathetic Michigan fan. You're lucky if you've got one of there. Saturday non-withstanding, I am lucky to have SCM around for this.
2) Reactionary Michigan fan. Fire the whole staff type stuff; we should go 13-0 every season given the talent, bler bler bler.
3) Sympathetic Opposing fan. Really there for the schadenfreude of it all, but will pretend to care.
4) Reactionary Opposing fan. This guy just wants to watch Michigan burn to the ground.
This blog, if we can allow a peek behind the curtains, isn't the most commented on piece of work on the internets. And I'm ok with that. I know people are reading, it allows me to write, which I enjoy doing, and sometimes you get some fun little debates. The loss last Saturday prompted not just one, but five (Brian is laughing hysterically right now - "a whole FIVE?!?") emails in my inbox. Most included the dreaded ALL CAPS RESPONSE WITH MULTIPLE EXCLAMATION POINTS FOR EMPHASIS. All wanted Rodriguez and his staff fired.
For the record: I believe it would be a mistake of nearly irreparable proportions if Rodriguez is fired after this year. When you look at some of the most successful teams in both the NFL and college, you have two things: continuity at coaching, and continuity at quarterback. Throughout his tenure, and for much of the latter part of Carr's tenure (I'm looking at you, defensive coordinator), Rodriguez and his players have had neither. He hasn't had time. Forcier, believe it or not, is good enough to provide the continuity at quarterback for the future. To fire Rodriguez will start this process over and we will find ourselves in this same quagmire after year two of the hypothetical new coach's tenure. For a one year investment in Rodriguez, we could be spared at least another 2 years misery under a new guy.
However, if you believe that now is the correct time to fire Rodriguez, and bring in whatever pipe-dream coach you've got in your head, well, you're on your own then. I disagree with you, and I can argue with you about it, but the facts are there right now for you to have a legitimate point. Save for Notre Dame, we haven't beat a single team that we lost to last year. Our conference record, if the prognostications are correct, stands to be worse than last year's. The bare minimum of requirement for this season - let alone a season that started 4-0 - was a bowl game. That is in jeopardy.
So yes, emailers, and yes, people I talk to on the street who notice I have a Michigan hat on and just can't wait to talk to me about it, I am worried. I am worried that a new AD and a potential NCAA investigation combined with another bowl-less season will spell the end of Rodriguez. That, to repeat myself, would be a huge mistake, IMO, but there it is. If you're one of the people who want to argue, or ask "what does he have to do to get you to change your mind" my answer is this: I no longer think you are a moron (in a loving, sports-related-argument kind of way) for thinking Rodriguez should be fired, and you're on your own. I will not, and cannot talk you down from your position, because frankly, your position is actually supported by what I see on the field. Again, I'm willing to give it another year. But I'm tired of arguing about it because at this point there is enough evidence; you might be right.
(Update: Road Games chips in)
1 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Firing RR would me a monumental mistake
You said it best, Who in the right mind is going to take over this team and return them to the dominant team that they once were. NO ONE!
Even LES MILES HIMSELF COULDN’T DO IT (not that he wants to)
Not that I am a huge RR fan but I don’t believe that he was EVER given a fair chance by the Michigan Mafia.
Whether you like it or not, RR is here to stay. At least for the next two years…
by mniuxtesd on Nov 10, 2009 5:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Right on
Totally agree. My complete take:
http://roadgames07.blogspot.com/2009/11/down-in-hole.html
by Reed97 on Nov 10, 2009 5:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Four years minimum.
Period, done, end of discussion. My Saturday meltdown notwithstanding I don’t care if we finish 5-7, he gets four years, and Michigan will give him at least that.
Very well written Beauford, you’ve captured the feeling quite effectively and succinctly.
GO BLUE! http://www.maizenbrew.com/
by SCM on Nov 10, 2009 5:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Drink kool-aid...
And yell your hearts out for the maize and blue. For the team who sweat and bleed week in, week out to try to win ball games, there are still super fans who are right here behind you and the program. Good luck, stay focused and right the ship for the next two weeks.
Go Blue!
by GoBlue4ever on Nov 10, 2009 7:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Let me throw something out there
from a non-Michigan fan. You’re lucky to be having this debate.
Don’t take this the wrong way, it’s been a brutal two year stretch for UM fans, I can appreciate that. Not making a bowl game when you are accustomed to it is a humbling experience. That being said, you have a tremendous history, fanbase and facilities. You will get recruits. And even if RR is not the person to turn it around, someone else will be.
I understand if you want to flame or disregard this, after all, my team is doing well this year. I remember well 2007 though, and I assure you, the torches were lit for Ferentz. I remember 1999-2000 when all anyone could do is cry that we couldn’t magically get Stoops. Knee jerk reactions by fans who all want to win right now. It’s not always that easy.
The reason I say you’re lucky is because this is still the aberration. This is two bad years in decades of dominance. You’re not Indiana or Purdue or Minnesota. You’re not even Iowa (Years of mediocrity with a few very good years thrown in). I understand the fear that if it doesn’t turn around quickly that it will become the norm, but I truly don’t believe that will happen.
The only thing I can suggest is that you remember. Remember what the good years meant, and hold on to these years. You’ll be able to look back and savor the wins that much more when you see where you’ve come from. It’s not fun, but you learn a lot about yourself as a fan when it’s hard to be a fan.
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 10, 2009 8:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Big House Part II
I appreciate all of the level-headed comments in this blog. That also means the ones that are nonsensical are ignored. That being said, I only hope that in the next few years we are not looking at a mammoth mausoleum at the corner of Stadium and Main. It used to be magical to spend a Saturday going to games. Maybe I am aging a bit sour, but the weekly disappointments are starting to add up. Sigh………….
by TommyTuneUp on Nov 11, 2009 4:10 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Try being a Penn State student from Fall 2000-Spring 2005.
2000: 5-7
2001: 5-6
2002: 9-4
2003: 3-9
2004: 4-7
The first game I attended as a frosh in 2000 was 24-6 loss to Toledo in the home opener. I could talk about one bowl game over the course of 5 years.. I could talk about being in the freaking stands for the 6-4 loss to Iowa, the game that almost turned me against college football period. Did I add that I’m a freaking Kansas City Royals fan? I’m sure you are going through a crisis of conscience right now but just grab some perspective. If you guys really believe that you are going to have 2 more losing seasons over the next 3 years than I buy the woe is me act. But each and every one of you knows that if RR doesn’t win next year that Les Miles or Jim Harbaugh will be your coach in 2011 and you’ll be fine.
by dyehardfan on Nov 11, 2009 8:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Let me add my two cents
As a Syracuse fan. Be careful. We went through the exact same debate with Greg Robinson.
All the rationale was the same. The decline began when we stopped being nationally relevant. The cupboard was bare (even though he inherited a team that went to a bowl). The team was adjusting to a new system on offense and defense. He just needs to get HIS players in there. Well, we can’t change courses now… that would be even worse.
Before you laugh…turn back the clock to 2004 when we fired our version of Lloyd Carr—Paul Pasqualoni. We had grown tired of .500 seasons. Nevermind that we had one sub .500 season between 1987 and 2004. We had not had a 10-win season since 2001. We failed to replace McNabb. Ever. Vick was going to come and changed his mind… dooming us. The fan base was restless and wanted more. We got less. MUCH LESS. Now… most of you probably can’t even remember when Syracuse was “good.”
Here are three reasons to make a move after next season:
- YES, it is STUPID to bring in a new system and change overnight. It was stupid when Greg Robinson tried to convert a Syracuse team that had 4,000 yards of offense in 2004 into a West Coast Offense and dropped down to an embarrassing 2,500 yards of offense in 2005… going… get this 1-10. 1 losing season in 18 years… and G-Rob leads us to 1-10, after a 6-6 season. A 5 game drop may not mean incompetence, but it is stupid. For RR to do that—after benefitting from G-Rob’s cluelessness—is even more dumb.
- Where do you go? G-Rob went 1-10… then 4-8 in 2006. Well… why not expect 2007 to be better? It did not pan out… as we went 2-10. It was only midway during this season that I lost faith in G-Rob. We upset a very good Louisville team and then lost to Miami of Ohio. How could we be over-confident? How could we have less talent than Miami? But we did. I wrote a passionate letter to the Syracuse AD, who responded by telling me I was a bad fan (paraphrasing). He brings G-Rob back,…. we go 3-9.. .and continued the course of suckiness.
For 2010… if RR can’t win more games you HAVE TO make the move. Here is why… no matter what happens in 2011… that coach gets momentum. If the 2011 team sucks… well, it just proves that the RR era was a disaster. If the 2011 team is good, it shows that the RR era was disaster AND that the team is back in good hands. Either way, the fans and the team can move on.
- Hiring Greg Robinson is, itself, a terminable offense. Don’t get me started on that…
by ezcuse on Nov 11, 2009 9:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Let's just say it this way
We are GLAD to have Scott Shafer. At least we tackle now.
There is not a single complaint that I have read about Greg Robinson in 2009 that is AT ALL different from 2005-2008 at Syracuse. Go check our blogs… check the archive.
Arm tackling… check. Not only would we arm tackle… our guys would get dragged for three yards in making the stop.
CB space… for 4 years, we got to see CBs lined up 10 yards away from receivers, regardless of the distance needed for a first down. Nothing is more deflating for me, a fan, than a 3 and 3 wasted because they completed an uncontested 5 yard pass. (And, because we could not tackle, the YAC would often end up being huge too).
We couldn’t get pressure with 4 guys. We couldn’t get pressure with blitzes. We couldn’t stop the run or the pass.
Oh… we were a happy bunch. Greg will always talk positively. Guys were “flying around” out there. He would see “flashes.” The fan favorite was “we are a snowball waiting to catch fire.” I wish I was joking.
But it was always a failure to execute. Well… when you put players out of position, how the heck CAN they execute??? No matter if the guy is a senior All-American or a true freshmen, if he is on an island 10 yards away from the line of scrimmage… that 3rd and 4 IS getting converted. That’s not the kids fault.
So what we have discovered since he left is that we have an excellent tackling team that is able (save for last week) stop the run. We still can’t stop the pass. But we were top 10 against the run. And we finally hit people.
RR hiring G-Robinson is just foolish. That’s all I can say.
by ezcuse on Nov 11, 2009 9:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 










