Previewin': Purdue
via www.pycomall.com |
Maize n' Brew mercilessly drifts through another preview. This week is going to be a bit preview heavy as we lead into the season. Ladies and Gentlemen, the Purdue Boilermakers.
Previously: Illinois, Northwestern, Penn State, Iowa, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Indiana
Explanation and indemnifications found: here
Apologies for this preview being a bit on the perfunctory side. It's not great. With the Rodriguez kerfluffle and the fact that I still need to do OSU and Michigan, well, Purdue took a back seat. Apologies.
Last season didn't go so well for the Boilermakers as they compiled a 4-8 record - just one win better than the Wolverines. That win could have very well come from the Wolverines who lost against a Purdue team featuring a converted ball-boy at starting quarterback. Ok fine, not a ball boy. Still though, not a quarterback. Justin Siller killed us last year by basically being the exact type of quarterback we all thought we would be; running. This was, as you'll recall, also the game during which it became increasingly apparent that the Scott Shafer at Defensive Coordinator era was over.
This season doesn't look much better for the Boilermakers as they return only 3 offensive starters from an offense that was only the 68th best scoring offense in the country. The defense, meanwhile, returns 7 from a serviceable if not "good" unit. Also worth mentioning, Joe DIABEETUS Tiller has moved on to where the Lloyds go when they retire, and Danny Hope makes his debut at the helm. This season is going to be rough; there is very little doubt about it. Let's Hope (get it?) the new coach gets more time to prove himself.
More Previewin' after the jump
2009 Schedule
| 9/05 | Toledo | 12:00 PM | |
| 9/12 | @ No. 16 Oregon | 10:15 PM | |
| 9/19 | Northern Illinois | 12:00 PM | |
| 9/26 | No. 23 Notre Dame | 8:00 PM | |
| 10/03 | Northwestern | 12:00 PM | |
| 10/10 | @ Minnesota | 12:00 PM | |
| 10/17 | No. 6 Ohio State | TBA | |
| 10/24 | Illinois | TBA | |
| 10/31 | @ Wisconsin | TBA | |
| 11/07 | @ Michigan | TBA | |
| 11/14 | Michigan State | TBA | |
| 11/21 | @ Indiana | TBA |
All I can say is watch out for Toledo.
One thing the media will harp on that is off base:
Yeah, we all know that the offense is replacing a ton of starters. Witness this returning leader list:
- Rushing: Frank Halliburton, RB, 37 yards
- Passing: Joey Elliott, QB, 81 yards
- Receiving: Keith Smith, WR, 486 yards
Yikes. So that's going to be the main focus of any hand-wringing. But that offense last year; the one that's being replaced? Yeah, not so good. I mean, it can't get much worse (says Michigan fan coming off a 3-9 season wherein the offense was record-shatteringly bad). I'm not so sure that the offense can't be at least competent, which brings us to our next point...
One thing the media will completely ignore that is integral to this team's success:
What I would be concerned with would be a defense that gave up an average of 174 yards rushing per game last year, dead last in the conference. When you're allowing opposing teams to run over you like that, you're not going to win many ball games. If the defense shores up and stops the run, they could win some football games. But probably not many.
Most important contributors on each side of the ball:
Offensively it's going to be the fact that they at least return the majority of their offensive line.
Defensively it's defensive end Ryan Kerrigan who had 7 sacks and 12 TFL's last season.
Area that scares you as Michigan Wolverines:
Much like Indiana, there isn't a whole lot on this Purdue team that scares me. I suppose we could get into another match like last season where both teams just said "f-this" to defense and we got into a shooting match. Beyond that, the defense looks pretty porous for the rushing attack.
Area that makes you salivate as the Michigan Wolverines:
It's in Ann Arbor, where Purdue has a record of -23 and a billion.
Overall Record:
2-10
Final Big Ten Standing
11th
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We're winning more than 2 games
The attitude around the program is a lot better than last year. Since last season’s offense was so horrible I don’t see it as a bad thing we have so little coming back.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
You might be right
and frankly, I like Purdue and hope you are, it’s just that in looking everything over on a purely “on paper” basis, Purdue is the weakest team in the league. What’s more, you’ve got some tough OOC matches on your hands.
I frankly don’t see where Purdue wins a single conference game with the exception of Indiana at the end.
www.maizenbrew.com
Get it?
we'll win another one
I think our defense alone will be much stronger and good enough to steal one other game other than IU. I don’t really see how IU can be considered as better than us.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
And how about a big +1 for formatting that image up top. Good stuff there.
www.maizenbrew.com
Get it?
Great coverage
We also have a senior RB named Jaycen Taylor who had a knee injury last year but definitely rushed for more than Frank’s 37 yards in his previous years.
I also like how you say “there isn’t a whole lot on this Purdue team that scares me” when Michigan gave up 48 points to this non-scary team last year.
I know the teams are different, but seriously? Humility is a great thing.
[insert prophetic yet obnoxiously haughty and annoying quote here]
What would you say
The “there isn’t a whole lot on this Purdue team that scares me” wasn’t meant to be a dig. If you had a paper-deep knowledge of Purdue football this year, what would scare you about this team? The offense is new (which might not be a bad thing, as mentioned previously in the article), the coach is new, and the defense returns after allowing 170+ YPG rushing last year. I said what I meant: what scares me is if we get into another “f-this defense stuff” shootout.
Basically, what scares me about the Purdue game isn’t really anything on Purdue’s side – rather – it’s if Michigan sucks like last year and allows 48 points. It could happen, but it won’t be because the Purdue offense is a great unit. Just like they weren’t last year.
www.maizenbrew.com
Get it?
precisely my point
Nothing from Purdue scares mighty Michigan. Only way Michigan loses is if Michigan screws up. Blah, blah, blah, heard it all before.
The sheer arrogance of schools like UM, ND, and the like is staggering sometimes.
How many season-openers do your boys need to lose to cupcakes before that starts to subside?
[insert prophetic yet obnoxiously haughty and annoying quote here]
no really
Point to something on Purdue that should scare me. On paper, there is nothing I can point to and say “this might cause problems.” I’d be happy to take your choice for consideration.
You’ll notice I’ve also penned Purdue for a 2-10 season, which means I think they’re just above Indiana and just below MAC schools this year, so clearly, I don’t think they’re very good. I also have Michigan down for a 6-6 record, which isn’t exactly blatant homerism. In fact, I don’t think I’ve used the words “mighty” at all. I would also wager that I’ve been pretty much the LEAST arrogant UM blogger on the internet over this past year. How would I not come across as arrogant? Say that Purdue is going to win? Tell you that your QB situation, RB situation, AND WR situation isn’t a problem?
What do you want from me?
www.maizenbrew.com
Get it?
Indignant much?
Until the cupcake we lose a season opener to is named “Purdue”, then the answer to your question is “untold amounts”. It’d also probably help if the Boilers had won in Ann Arbor at least once since the Nixon Administration…. or tallied more than 13 wins EVER against our team. That’s just looking at historical precedent, never mind when you look at actually pertinent things like Beauford did, you know, like the makeup of your current football team and all. I’d love to see any reasoning to support why teams should be scared of Purdue this year.
GO BLUE! http://www.maizenbrew.com/
exactly
I am not saying much until we lose a game in Ann Arbor by less than two touchdowns. in all honesty, we have no room to talk until at least that happens.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Also
Thanks for the heads up on Jaycen Taylor. He’ll be the starter this year?
www.maizenbrew.com
Get it?
RB
Taylor and Bolden will both start games throughout the season. Purdue’s running backs are something other teams can worry about.
Also, remember the name Ken Plue…Purdue will have a legit pulling guard this season and he’s a manchild.

by 

















