Penn State Quarterback Situation Best Described As "Injurterricrap"
That sound you heard when starting quarterback Robert Bolden came out of the game midway through the 2nd quarter against Minnesota was thousands of Michigan fans simultaneously sighing in relief that, for once, quarterback issues were not their own. Stop me if you're heard this before: A true freshman is named starter at a traditional powerhouse after a springtime's worth of hype, fanbase relentlessly says that quarterback situation is just fine if not great, True Freshman starts off just fine before the wheels come off entirely. Sound familiar? Like, 2008 familiar? 2009 familiar?
But that can't be! It won't be Nick Sheridan/Steven Threet level bad, will it BSD?
I think it's a bit early to compare Penn State's situation to Michigan's in 2008. Threet and Sheridan are two guys who had no business playing Division IA football, let alone starting at the University of Michigan. They had dead arms and ran the Rich Rodriguez spread option like their shoes were made out of cement. They were basically both beat out of the job the minute Tate Forcier stepped on campus. That's a disaster.
Now certainly, the situations don't mirror each other perfectly - Bolden will likely be a solid Big Ten quarterback by the time he's finished, but the gist of the argument remains: when a true freshman is beating out high level recruits like Kevin Newsome, you've got a bad situation on your hands. One might even call it a disaster. To date, Bolden has thrown 7 TD's to 9 INTs. He went 8-21 against Illinois. He is not yet ready for Big Ten football, and yet, he was Penn State's best option. If this isn't Michigan 2008, I don't know what is. To compound matters is the fact that Penn State's pass protection has actually been pretty good - they've only allowed 5 sacks on the year good for 12th in the nation.
When Bolden came out against Minnesota, he was replaced by Matt McGloin, a walk on from Scranton, PA. If Bolden isn't cleared to play against Michigan on Saturday, it will likely be McGloin who leads the Nittany Lions onto the field. Of course, Jay Paterno is playing it close to the vest, saying that Bolden could play this weekend against Michigan. With Kevin Newsome apparently nowhere to be found, Penn State finds themselves in the situation that Michigan fans know too well: an unproven, shaky true-freshman, or a walk on. I'm not saying that Michigan is going to win this weekend; our pass defense can certainly make just about anyone look like a Heisman candidate, but the quarterback situation at Penn State should be wildly more conducive for this Michigan pass defense than anybody we've played thus far. For once, Michigan seems to be set at quarterback, and hopefully they can take advantage of a team scrambling for answers at that position like so many teams did against us over the past few years.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Michigan 2008
From the standpoint of having to choose between inexperienced true freshman and walk-on, I would compare this situation to Michigan 2009 versus 2008, but I can see your comparison and parallels.
The difference I see is that, in 2008, Michigan didn’t have anyone capable of being a Big Ten quarterback. Sheridan just didn’t have the talent and although I suppose the argument could be made for Threet being capable, I don’t believe it. He still hasn’t solidified a starting spot at ASU two years later, let alone be successful in RichRod’s high-speed ground game as a sophomore.
That 2008 offense was scary bad. It still amazes me that we won three games and made Utah as close as it was. I understand I lean to giving coaches four years to begin with versus what seems the be the more commonly-accepted three but I don’t see how 2008 can be used against RichRod. Yes, we sucked and ultimately the responsibility falls on the head coach. Yes, a good coach will shape his schemes to fit his players. Yes, 2011 will be his fourth year, but I don’t see how anyone can look at it other than being his third (add an asterisk if you want). 2008 we had no one except our running backs and they couldn’t stay healthy. O-line: MIA. Wideouts: MIA (or one of the many effects of playing w/ our QBs). QBs: Something worse than MIA.
Any predictions for the score? I’ve got Michigan 42, PSU 24. We’ll make either Royster or McGloin look pretty damn good with our defense, just pick your poison: air or land? Hopefully we get some injury-free Denard play and a chance for Tate to get some reps in the second half…maybe this is asking too much, but 10 carries from Fitz Toussaint so we can have something more than practice hype? 10+ carries from anyone not named Vincent Smith would be an improvement to RB depth so I’ll just go with that. Hopkins? Shaw? Beuller? Anyone?
by Good Ol' Oakley on Oct 25, 2010 12:23 PM CDT reply actions
Don't blame Bolden
There are a lot of problems with this PSU team, but Rob Bolden is not one of them. He was 11-for-13 with 130 yards and a TD before he got injured on Saturday. He’s made some bone headed plays like all freshmen, but the upside looks pretty good. He’s already shown more promise than Anthony Morelli showed at any point in his entire career.
Make no mistake. The problem with Penn State is the offensive line. They can’t get any running game going, and that puts Bolden in a lot of 3rd and long situations. Show me a quarterback that excels in that situation.
If Bolden plays I think he’ll have a big day. I’d say Michigan’s secondary is on par with Minnesota’s if not worse. It’ll be interesting to see what happens if he can’t. McGloin got the call over Newsome on Saturday because Newsome was ill all week and almost didn’t make the trip. What I’ve seen of McGloin so far is better than anything I saw from Threet and Sheridan, so I’m still not buying the comparisons to Michigan ’08.
The PSU '10 to UM '08 comparison is apt
Penn State 2010 – 119/212, 1461 yards, 56% comp, 6.8 ypa, 7 TDs, 9 INTs
Michigan 2008 – 105/199, 1054 yards, 53% comp, 5.3 ypa, 7TDs, 8 INTs
Outside of the total yards—and subsequently the ypa—these numbers are strikingly similar through 7 games. Although Penn State’s totals include Alabama and Iowa, UM’s totals include a Penn State team that finished the season #8 in the country as well as a Utah team that finished in the top 5. Pretty even schedules all around.
On pure efficiency, the two situations are nearly equal in production outside of a 400 yard difference (that did not produce any additional touchdowns). Both teams also featured patchwork offensive lines and bad running games (986/3.9 ypc/9 TDs for Mich and 901/4.0 ypc/6 TDs for PSU). You are looking at an almost pitch perfect recreation of the Michigan offense in 2008, at least so say the numbers.
The difference is Bolden will develop into at least a good Big Ten QB (with the potential to be great). Neither Sheridan or Threet were getting any better in the system, and that meant a longer period of development for the Michigan offense. If PSU figures out the offensive line problems in the offseason they should be able to make a much bigger jump than Michigan did from ’08 to ’09.
Go Blue!
I didn't see that game
How did Bolden look (from a non-statistical standpoint)? At 10 yards an attempt I gotta imagine he made at least a few solid downfield throws.
How is the Penn State defense going to look? Similar to Iowa and elcc, or will Denard be successful?
Silas Redd is from my hometown btw
GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by 






















