Halloween Frights and a Plea for Sanity (For a Little While Anyway)
On a night when many dressed up in costumes and went to bars and parties amidst a sea of faceless people, I am almost certain that Rich Rodriguez had at least one moment when he wished he could put on a mask and disappear into a crowd. How could he not? If my reaction as a fan hundreds of miles away was to scream irrationally at the television, slam my fist down on my ottoman, and throw whatever was in front of me against the adjacent wall, I can't even imagine being in charge of that debacle. At least I could walk away from it for a little while, which I did early in the fourth quarter when I left for the bar with some friends. I still searched for and ultimately found a radio feed of the game once we got in the car. I couldn't stand to watch the proceedings anymore, but I still couldn't totally turn my back on the game. Michigan football 2010: masochism without all the nifty gadgets and leather.
What we witnessed Saturday night under the lights of Beaver Stadium was disheartening at best and I can't even put in to words what it was at worst. This wasn't just a case of a defense being exposed against an unlikely opponent. This was a defense surrendering the single best game of the season to a beaten up and depleted offense. No first string quarterback? No problem. Inconsistent run game? Not an issue. Offensive line problems? Don't worry about it. Hell, some of us even made jokes about the "McFavre" moniker that Penn State fans had attached to Matt McGloin. Looks like the joke's on us.
Offensively there isn't too much to say. Coming out of a bye week the Wolverines got off to a somewhat understandably slow start. Once the wheels started turning the offense rolled along comfortably for the entire second half--save for the final drive. Even the special teams showed up for the most part. Competent kickoffs, a made FG, and only one horrific return error has to be considered a win, right? Right?
Wrong. You have to show up in all three phases of the game, and on Saturday it felt like the defense stayed back in Ann Arbor to get a head start on trick-or-treating.
Of course one of the main problems is our secondary only seems to be about two or three years removed from acceptable trick-or-treatimg age. The player participation list for the secondary in Saturday's game has six true freshmen, two RS-freshmen, two RS-sophomores, and one senior getting playing time. I would like to buy all of them a drink to help forget about getting torched by Nick Sheridan's ginger cousin, but only one of the eleven players who got playing time in the secondary is legally allowed to drink. Is it any wonder Matt McGloin found so much success against what is essentially a high school all-conference secondary? He may be a physically deficient walk-on, but he is smart enough to take what the defense gives him. Saturday the answer to what the defense would give him was anything he wanted.
Speaking of Halloween, it seems Evan Royster and the Penn State offensive line dressed up as the 2009 version of themselves, It certainly looked like last year's productive version of Royster was running around out there, and not this years inconsistent Royster behind a depleted and undersized offensive line. Coming in to the game I thought the front seven actually had a chance to keep Royster from beating the school rushing record. That hope died before the first drive ended. Although, Michigan's defense might have been better had Mike Martin no put on his Achilles costume for the night.
As has happened so many times this season we had our expectations ripped down another notch after weeks of rationalizing. After two losses to top 15 teams we all thought, "at least our defense will be good enough to beat Penn State." In the aftermath we are forced to revisit why we were ever so foolish in the first place. To think a defensive secondary which has more true freshman playing than upperclassmen could really be counted on to stop anyone. To think that we could survive an injury to the best player on the defense without significant drop off. To think that the offense wouldn't have to be electric for 95% of the game to win.
Ultimately this doesn't matter for some (and to be honest I find it increasingly tough to keep in mind myself). You play to win the game, and that has been something this team has utterly failed at outside the month of September.
I am going to cut right to the chase: it is still too early to talk about the fate of this coaching staff. If it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside to troll the message boards and shout down all of us "blind supporters" for pointing out silly things like the ridiculous average age of the defense and the encouraging offensive production, then so be it. Certainly no one is going to call you foolish for claiming this team is a .500 unit at best, or saying that this is the worst defense you have ever witnessed. But keep in mind that the book on Rodriguez hasn't been written yet. There are still four more games, and two of them still seem somewhat winnable. You may not like to admit it, but 7-5 is still the baseline that many set for this season, and with the gaping holes on this roster it is an understandable outcome.
There will be time to talk about hirings and firings. Who should be held accountable for the defense's performance this year--be it GERG or Rodriguez--and what should be done about it. I myself--an unabashed Rodriguez and GERG supporter--am coming around to the idea of at least some staffing changes happening in the offseason (cough, fire GERG, cough).
However, the time to talk about those things is still in the future, on the afternoon of November 27th. Once the season is in the books and we have a full three years of evidence on which to judge the perfomance of Rich Rodriguez.
As Michigan fans we have a tendency to be consumed by the quest for greatness. I am just as guilty of this as anyone else. I spend hours combing over recruiting profiles, looking at depth charts, and extrapolating individual improvement over three or four year periods. Everything comes back to the fundamental question of when. When will we compete for Big Ten Championships? When will we be good enough to make a run at the BCS? This abstract idea of some moment of future greatness clouds everything. We lose the forest for the trees. Is it our fault we were all spoiled for so long? That greatness was never in question, and Big Ten championships were always the baseline goal for a season. It is understandable that we fetishize this idea of "a return to glory." We want to get back to where we spent a good portion of our college football following lives.
That being said, we still have to maintain some perspective. Keep greatness as a goal for the future, but don't let it ruin your enjoying of the present. This is still a young team full of kids who are playing their hearts out. We owe it to them to keep watching for today, not some future return to greatness.
So if you must compose your list of suitable coaching replacements or your fifteen point lists of reasons to fire Rich Rodriguez, go ahead and do it. Just keep it to yourself. It is an insult to the kids who bust their ass every day and have more invested in this season than any of us do, that so many people are willing to write off the last four games and start looking to the future. This season isn't over for them, and if you really care about this team it shouldn't be over for you either.
If you have faith in anyone leading the program, have faith in David Brandon to do the right thing at the right time. I'm sure if you asked him he would tell you the same thing: The only thing to do right now is cheer on the team that you have, not wish for the team that you want down the road.
(Sidenote: As has happened more times than I care to count, the Wolverine Liberation Army says what I want to 1000 times better than I am able.)
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The benefit of patience...
To say I was livid Saturday night would be accurate, grasping at straws mad really. But the simple fact is this: when Lloyd retired in 2008 and we hired Rich Rodriguez, we set about an abrupt reset in this program and started on the long and arduous road of rebuilding. Things haven’t gone smoothly, but what we hired Rodriguez for among other things was his innovation on offense, and that has already started to bear fruit. This team is blowing the conference away in total offense, without a consistent running back and with a QB making his first starts of his career, the growth from ‘08 to ’09 to this year has been clear and consistent. The offense is working, not always, and not always smoothly, but it’s working. Meanwhile on the defensive side of the football, let us all recall that at one point in the offseason it was conceivable that the secondary could’ve consisted of Donovan Warren, Demar Dorsey, Troy Woolfolk, Vlad Emelien, and Justin Turner… all of whom are gone. I didn’t want to hear about the defensive attrition Saturday night, but we cannot ignore the impact that the personnel losses on defense have had, we’re starting a bunch of true freshmen and upper classmen who wouldn’t see the field in any normal circumstance.
What I don’t understand, and perhaps why I’m not a coach is, we seem to constantly cross ourselves up on defense by trying all of these different approaches and variations on the 3-3-5. Occam’s razor please, pick a formation (ahem 4-3) and run it, and run it exclusively. The defense doesn’t need to be good, it needs to be something resembling competent, it needs to get the ball back to the offense either by punt or turnover, and I don’t care one bit how it looks doing so. Take the decisions out of the mix, play a completely vanilla base D and focus on fundamentals like, oh I don’t know, tackling. The offense is good enough to win us games that remain on the schedule if they don’t have to play perfect football.
In short, I don’t think you fix things at this point by blowing it all up at this point. You give Rodriguez his four years to bring in four recruiting classes, you give him the opportunity to bring back nearly everyone again next year. You give him the opportunity to evaluate his defensive needs (staff wise, ahem) and to address them (perhaps with the not-so-gentle-prodding of Dave Brandon) and you see this thing through. When I look back at our previews leading up to the season, we all thought the D would be a major liability, and that was before we essentially lost half of the unit….
None of this changes the fact that the team should’ve played better on Saturday, they should’ve been more than prepared for a, quite frankly, poor Penn State squad, and they weren’t. That’s an indictment on coaching as much as anything. But going bezerk about it now doesn’t accomplish anything, you stay the course at this point, you see how the team responds and you re-evaluate at the end of the year just like Travis said. Me? I see an offense that’s only going to get better as it is still incomplete, I see a defense that cannot possibly play worse or be in a worse situation in terms of experience, injuries, or depth, and a special teams unit that just simply lacks a field-goal kicker. There are not overnight fixes to all of those problems, so why are people clamoring for an overnight firing? Address what we can, and keep the big picture in mind.
GO BLUE! http://www.maizenbrew.com/
Defense
I agree a plain 4-3 it doesn’t have to be fancy. A 4-3 could give us something up front pressure, stopping the train of running up the middle something. I don’t understand with your top nose tackle down why you don’t try using 4 D lineman especially with what they were doing all night long. Rich Rod needs to stop being hard headed and change HIS defensive scheme or he will be changed.
Now that I am calm and sober...
cause after walking out of Beaver Stadium, with my girlfriend that had made her first ever trip to a major college football game, I was neither. I was livid. The unit that had made me sick to my stomach hundreds of miles away was EVEN WORSE live! I had seen enough, 3 years of substandard football, 3 years of losing to teams we normally wax, 3 years of doing NOTHING to help ourselves out of a jam. When I bought my tickets I purposely got seats on and close to the Michigan sideline cause, 1: I wanted to be behind them, literally. 2: I wanted to try and make out what was being shouted out by the coaches to these young men. Well I will tell you this, I wasn’t able to make out too much of what was being said verbally but I could though body language and it was pure and utter confusion. These kids out there when don’t have the ball, don’t have a clue. They look to the sidelines for guidance from GR and co and there is nothing, they just jump around, shift around and yell at each other with absolutely nothing meaningful being said. We all know the situation, they are young. Whatever, these kids are just being put out there with no plan of attack and no support. They don’t look like freshmen they look like a bunch of kids in shoulder pads out there when we don’t have the ball, cause that’s what they are. Not once in this post have I called them a Defense. Why? Because that would be an insult to Defenses from High School to the NFL. Defensive players have assignments, defenses have schemes. This doesn’t resemble at all what I saw live in PA. Fire GR. Fire him now. Make a statement that that this type of poor play will not be accepted here. And please don’t talk to me about injuries. Injuries are apart of football and it is a chance for the young players to step up and right now they aren’t able to because they aren’t being put in a position to succeed. You tell me how GR can look himself in the mirror, go to bed at night, whatever! knowing that his unit made a walk-on QB look like Joe Montana?? How they can run an effing screen against us, GOD knows how many times for first down after first down?!! How even without getting any backfield penetration the effing screen can continue to work???!!! No adjustments, nothing. He’s got to go. I believe in RR, Denard and this Offense but GR has got to go.
I agree 100%
There are 4 games to be played. Two of the at home. Two of them against the worst offenses in the league. As young, inexperienced and beat up this UM defense is, just like last year these two games against Illinois and Purdue are going to probably be the turning point for Michigan.
Nobody likes what they see. It’s been a train wreck. Yet, we can’t quite look away either. Denard Robinson, Darryl Stonum, JR Hemingway, Roy Roundtree, Stephan Hopkins, RVB, Mike Martin, Kenny Demens and this OL – they are all still playing hard, fighting, working out, practicing, studying film and clawing away to win all that they can.
Most will return in 2011 to fight another day for Michigan. I’m still proud of them. The least we can do for the players this year is provide them our support, win or lose.
Go Blue!
I don't think scheme matters that much
On offense or defense.
USC blasted people off the ball with a pro-set offense and a mix of 5-2 and 4-3 fronts all day.
Florida ran a spread option offense and then mainly a 4-3 defense by Charlie Strong.
Alabama ran a pro style offense with pistol and spread variants and a multiple defense.
Oregon is flaunting a spread option offense identical to what Rodriguez ran at WVU, and multiple defensive packages from 3-4 to six man fronts at times. They’re blowing people off the field and are ranked No.1.
What matters are coaches who understand the objective, and know the strategy and tactics to apply in order to win games. Rodriguez and Magee are nailing the offensive objective this year. Michigan is lighting it up on offense this fall without a premier and reliable package at tailback (basically Oregon sans LaMichael James). Wait until Dee Hart shows up. Defensively, Michigan has never looked worse. GERG has been told to implement and coach a 3-3-5 set that his underlings are familiar with, but with which he himself has zero knowledge.
You can win college football games in the Big Ten with 4-3, 4-4, 5-2, and 4-2-5 defenses. OSU, PSU, Iowa and MSU – the better defensive squads of the Big Ten in recent years all run mainly a 4-3 set for it’s versatility and 4 defensive backs.
The spread offense has it’s place in the Big Ten also, as OSU and PSU have proven over and over in recent years.
It’s not so much scheme as it is talent and experience, which leads to faster play and higher confidence.
Go Blue!
Great points
I agree whole-heartedly. I have had this same conversation with many of my friends who are Michigan State fans. One asked me point blank when I would concede that the spread offense cannot work in the Big Ten. My answer was and continues to be that schemes don’t ultimately matter as much as having coaches who are effective teachers and game managers and players who are adept at reading offenses and executing in the scheme they play.
The 3-3-5 and the spread-n-shred offense aren’t inherently flawed when deployed anywhere in the midwest. If you have the right mix of players and coaches you will be able to find success with whatever scheme you run. We have already seen that on one side of the ball. Unfortunately, bad luck, injuries, attrition, and frankly some mistakes by Rodriguez and the rest of the staff have left the other side of the ball a smoldering mess.
I still have hope for the future. With another good recruiting class, the return of the vast majority of defensive contributors, and the necessary shakeups within the defensive coaching staff we could see some progression back to an average statistical defense next year, which should be enough to allow this offense to thrive. This defense won’t have a chance to be dominant for another three or more years, but that was widely held to be the case before the season started.
Go Blue!
http://www.maizenbrew.com/
scheme
Defensively, Michigan has never looked worse. GERG has been told to implement and coach a 3-3-5 set that his underlings are familiar with, but with which he himself has zero knowledge.
You can win college football games in the Big Ten with 4-3, 4-4, 5-2, and 4-2-5 defenses. OSU, PSU, Iowa and MSU – the better defensive squads of the Big Ten in recent years all run mainly a 4-3 set for it’s versatility and 4 defensive backs.
So the scheme does matter!
Saturday's Debacle
I must admit that the previous comments reflect quite adequately my own feelings, and I am sure the feelings of most of us Wolverine fans. We understand that youth is an issue, but the correct focus, as written above, isn’t to condemn the young players but the coaching. Put another way: the error Rodriguez made in the beginning of his tenure was to try to force a scheme on a group of youngsters unprepared and incapable of managing the complexities. The same is true of the defense now. Rather than take the talent one has and coach that talent within its capabilities to learn and improve, Robinson has tried to force the talent level beyond reach. At one point in the game I thought the best solution for Michigan was not to send the defense on the field. That way Penn would score with less time taken off the clock and the offense would have the chance to keep us back in the game. More realisitically Robinson needs to focus on stopping the run. Fill the line with at least four down rushing men, and the box with the other three, close in because once the blockers get through the line, as they do consistently with only three in front, the O-line was pushing the linebackers into the deep second level giving their running backs room. We could protect against neither the pass nor the run when we tried to do both. Focus instead on stopping the run, and if the opposition beats you with the pass, so be it. At least the pain is over sooner.
When I watched the team 10th in the conference in third down conversions get nearly 80% of them, some at 3rd and 15 or more, it was downright heartbreaking. As one commenter said, Livid! and angry for hours afterward.
Why the emotion? Because we do care deeply about the program and the history of Michigan football. We are FANS, devoted for some odd reason to seeing the classy act of Big Ten Football, as opposed to the thuggery we have seen elsewhere to the far south. We love the competitiveness of the conference, to the ascension even of Ohio State as long as they aren’t playing us, of Michigan State, Northwestern, Wisconsin, and all the rest, as long as they aren’t playing us, and to have the Wolverines plummet so precipitously is agonizing.
I agree we should, and will, stick with Michigan even as we trash some of the coaches. Perhaps the only players we were glad to see go were those who were too self-absorbed to truly appreciate the legacy they carry every time they are seen on or off the field. But watching Michigan football flounder repeatedly is almost too much for my coronaries to stand.
Michael Bogdasarian
Sort of a poll question
With four games left, if they go 1-3 or (jeez) 0-4 does Rich Rod get flushed? Or does he get one more year? I can’t imagine the AD keeping him and the staff if they don’t get to six wins but who know? Is there a magic number here he has to hit?
I don't know...
but I am glad it isn’t my decision. I am a firm believer in giving coaches a full four years, but that might not be a popular sentiment in another month.
I’m just praying that we pull out the next two games and make the decision a lot easier on Brandon.
Go Blue!
http://www.maizenbrew.com/

by 




















