Picking Up The Pieces: What Michigan Needs To Do To Get Ready For Illinois
As much as I'd like to write "Tackle" and close this post out, that may be a tad overly simplistic, yes? Well. Maybe not, but it'd be a short piece and I'm sure you'd like to waste a little more time this morning than that. Believe it or not there were good things to take away from Saturday's game. Really. There were.... on offense. On defense... ehhh... notsomuch.
Regardless, Michigan now enters a four game stretch that will likely define whether Rich Rodriguezremains in Ann Arbor for year number four. This isn't stating anything unexpected or controversial. This is being realistic. Coming into this season Michigan not only needed to show improvement, but finish with at least a .500 record. When Danny Hope of Purdue has more wins in the Big Ten this season than Rodriguez has over the last TWO YEARS, something ain't quite right.
Michigan has four games to win two games. Two wins gets Michigan to seven wins and a decent bowl game. Think Decemberish, somewhere in the south against a crappy Big XII or ACC team. One win out of Three... then it gets dicey and all bets are off as to whether Rodriguez remains around. If Michigan is competitive, then a .500 record likely saves his bacon. Irrespective of that, Robinson and the entire defensive staff are likely gone by the end of the season regardless of whether Rodriguez wants to keep any of them around.
So in order to make it more likely that Michigan gets to a real bowl game and we get to see Rodriguez' offense operate as a veteran unit (think West Virginia circa 2005), some changes need to be made. Here are five suggestions to at least try to improve our chances of a win against Illinois., lets hear yours.
Suggestion One: I know this one will be unpopular, but I'm going to say it anyway, start Tate Forcier against Illinois. I know Denard Robinson almost went 200/200 against Penn State, but it's obvious that he cannot throw the ball accurately right now. Watching him throw right now reminds me of watching Tate throw last season. Robinson was 11-23 against Penn State's porous pass defense (porous because it was missing its best safety!). He trailed receivers on just about every throw. His velocity was wonky. His ball placement has been horrible. I don't care what he can do on the ground if he can't throw the damn ball.
"But Dave, what about that 60 yarder to Kevin Koger?" Sure, Robinson got it out there but busted coverage and a floating duck to Koger do not demonstrate that his arm is in one piece. Just so we're clear, that pass was more than 30% of Denard's passing yardage on the day. The threat of the run is only as good as the threat of the pass. Ever since the Michigan State game defenses have challenged Robinson to beat them with his arm. He hasn't. They're stacking the box and taking their chances in the air.
The counter argument to this is fairly obvious, if Rodriguez is going out, he's going out with his best player under center. To an extent that's an argument I respect. The issue is whether Robinson is truly healthy. I don't think he is. And Rodriguez' best chance to win is with a healthy Tate Forcier rather than a dinged up Denard Robinson.
More After the Jump.....
Suggestion Two: For the love of God, STOP PUTTING VINCENT SMITH OUT THERE IN SHORT YARDAGE SITUATIONS! How many times do you have to get stopped on 3rd and 2 to learn your goddamn lesson, Rich!? This recurring rant is really, really starting to piss me off. Smith is a great back out of the backfield as a receiver. he's a pretty good 1st down back. He is not, under any scenario I can fathom, a short yardage back. Hopkins is 220+. Use him in those situations because he actually goes forward. How this continues to be an issue baffles me.
Suggestion Three: Bench Jeremy Gallonon Punt or Kick-Off returns. Gallon has been a disaster returning kicks all season. For the love of all that's holy, bench him until he learns how to catch a kick. His mind-numbing screwup, fumbling a kick off out of bounds at the 2 in the middle of the second quarter, basically buried any hope Michigan had of coming back in the game. It was 10-21 and the defense had shown no ability to stop a sneeze, let alone a third string backup quarterback. That fumble killed the Michigan offense, and led directly to 7 more PSU points as Michigan played not to give up the pick six (which Robinson almost threw anyway). Look, Rich, you spent a scholarship on Drew Dileo to return kicks. Let him do it. The two returns he's had make him look useful. At this point it's worth a try. Unless Dileo turns into Martavious Odoms circa 2008, he'll be an improvement.
Suggestion Four: Play Craig Roh as a defensive end. We're boned on D anyway, so stop making it easier for teams to pass on us.
Suggestion Five: Bench J.T. Floyd. It's become obvious that teams are passing right at him. This despite having James Rogersas the other corner. Think about that for a second. I think something happened in the Iowa game and things just aren't right. Floyd has been burnt crispy in back to back games and teams are passing DIRECTLY at him, despite the presumption that he is our "best" cornerback. If you feel his presence in the game is necessary, move him to safety, where he can play the deep ball and support the run. But in coverage he's been a disaster recently. Until he gets his confidence back, play some of the freshmen. The result will likely be the same, but at least there's some hope of improvement.
Right now that's all I've got. If you've got suggestions that don't entail the wholesale firing of the coachign staff and might actually be implemented before the Illinois game, let me know in the comments below.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Uhhh....
Duck and cover?
Illinois has put up over 30 points in three of their last four games. I don’t really know what Michigan can do. I like the idea of giving Tate some run. Anything is worth a shot at this point.
Zone Read
We need a threat at running back for an effective zone read and a threat at quarterback to open up the holes, right? Put Tate in at QB and Denard as the running back. They’ll have to respect both. Plus once Denard burns them a few times after taking the hand-off from Tate he could utilize that one-man play action and hit someone wide open over the middle.
On D, I say play tight and blitz the crap out of Scheelhause. He hasn’t proven he can hit the deep ball and if he does it just gives the ball back to our offense anyway. I’d prefer that to the slow bleed we’re experiencing now…
Robinson is gonna be the starter as long as he is healthy enough for it. So you think his shoulder is still hurt and that is affecting his throws? He threw well earlier in the year. I just think he is a sophomore and experiencing what it is like to start a full college football season. Hopefully, his accuracy comes back. The tate as qb and robinson as rb is an interesting thought though.
Robinson's definitely hurt
He’s missing open receivers now without any pressure on him. that’s something he wasn’t doing earlier in the year and something you saw Tate do a lot as the season went on last year when Tate’s shoulder was banged up. If you watched Robinson on Saturday you could see how taped up his shoulder was under the pads. that’s not a good sign. I’ll wager a buck he’s a lot more hurt than people are letting on.
Robinson as a tailback wouldn’t last long. He’s proven that he’ll get dinged too much and then you’ve also got the issue of pass blocking, which I’m not counting on him to be able to do.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Nov 2, 2010 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Denard had his shoulder wrapped with something
If you look at the game film from Penn State, it’s obvious that Denard had some type of wrap or brace on his throwing shoulder, that’s obviously going to affect his accuracy. Our wide receivers haven’t helped him out by dropping some balls that could and should have been caught, but his accuracy has become more and more of a concern these last couple of games. Honestly, at this point in the season, we can’t keep sending Denard out and crossing our fingers that his shoulder has improved to the point where he starts throwing accurate balls consistently. Starting Tate for Illinois and Purdue will hopefully allow Denard to return at close to full-strength for Wisconsin and Ohio State.
Pack it up, Pack it in
Seriously….no chance in this one. Replace Penn State with Illinois and walk-on with freshman and you have all the articles you need for next week.
You can call it a hunch...
…but I believe the medical field refers to it as psychosis when you can’t distinguish reality from fantasy.
hey
You gotta believe man! One week at a time.
by PhilsForever on Nov 5, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions
okay dis article is a joke
okay first of all dis article is making denard look bad shit if we had wide reciever dat could actually could catch… if u didnt notice der was around 5-10 dropped balls dat were right on the number… next time watch the game before u say shit… just because hes a good rusher dont make him a terrible passer out of the whole season i only seen bout 5-10 really bad pass by him n the rest wasnt even his fault it was the reciever which dropped the ball…. n yes michigan def is terrible shouldnt be running a 3-3-5 n give it next year we got a freshman n soph def what do u expect use to shine so young…
i gave up
after the first “sentence” and third use of “d” in place of “th”. Sorry, I meant “da” first sentence and “dird” use of “d” in place of “th”.
As much as I would advise Jacob to write in English...
…I agree with the general gist of his point, without the sarcasm. Denard may be hurt, but I don’t think he’s missing too many reads, or hindering the offense to the point where he’s still not the best option – as you stated in the article he nearly went for 200-200 against Penn State. The problem is not Denard; the problem isn’t anybody on the offense. The problem lies squarely on the defense.
http://maizenbrew.com
Get it?
BLITZ, BLITZ, BLITZ!!!!
This has been driving me nuts since the Indiana game, when Ben Chappell, who can hardly move in the pocket, was just standing there…I mean standing in the backfield with no pass rush threatening him, Of course it was easy for him to complete long throws. If you give any QB and WR more than enough time, someone will get open…since Michigans’ corners, safeties, and linebackers can’t cover anyone, BLITZ, get someone in Scheelhaase’s face, rush him, and make him complete a poor throw.
Will this work? Probably not, because the defense is just miserable, but you can’t rely on the secondary to make plays. GERG needs to grow some and start taking risks!
by AWOOOOO-Werewolves of London on Nov 2, 2010 5:24 PM CDT reply actions
I agree .... BLITZ
But not up the middle !!! One of the biggest flawsof the 3 man front is when you blitz the O line already has 2 free lineman to pick up blitzers. As a result when we have blitzed LBers or safeties up the middle they absolutely NEVER get through …. Our only blitz sacks have come from th outside … so we need send whoever from the outside.
Dammit – I can’t believe we didn’t show 8 man fronts to that freakin walk-on last week. He had all day because GERG is a DC that doesn’t know jack shit !!! When you are in charge of the worst defense in the ENTIRE HISTORY of Michigan football … this means YOU are the DC in Michigan football HISTORY !!!
Go Blue !
this means you are the WORST DC in Michigan football HISTORY !!!
oops … too pissed to type correctly !!!
Go Blue !
The D or lack of
for those who don’t think RR is to blame for the D this is a good read.
http://www.freep.com/article/20101102/COL22/11020433/1103/Misguided-moves-behind-U-Ms-defensive-failings
Dear Michigan Football Brethrens'
This comment is also meant for alot of the MGOBLOG readers, I felt like in this forum my message would not get lost in that blogs cluster and that It might resonate more so, hopefully.
BTW, Before I do that, I suggested in the summer on Mich Sports Center Blog about making D-ROB a Chris Johnson like back because of how he remindwd me of him, that was before Sean shut down his great blog and went on to bigger endeavors, they’re doing a great job over there and I love the Lions page, now that’s a team on the rise, I think every remaining game is winnable finally w/Lions, oh how that would make up for Mich agonies, arghh!
I just wanna chime in on the topic of keeping/firing RR.1st off, why do the RR backers/defenders get so snippy at people who would probably rather see him go?
I’ve been following M Football for almost 40 yrs very closely, I started following HS recruiting in 1975, way before it became all the rage! I’ll be the 1st to tell you I’m not always correct but people who know me, respect my FB instincts. And my instincts tell me RR is not the guy!
He just isn’t, 3 yrs of excuses! I’m sick and tired of this and I have every effing right to be!
I wonder how old alot of you RR defenders are? I get the feeling it’s a younger crowd than the RR dis-likers I suppose. But I could be wrong of course. The reason I bring this up is because if you are less then say 20 maybe 25, perhaps some have become numb with the whole thing. However, I’m not! I want FB games at Mich to be won! dammit! All this other crap is for the birds, I’m sorry if I’m being rude but there you have it!
I’m sick of charts and explanations and whatnot, He is not winning Big 10 games, 4-16, there is an indicator for you and I don’t care if some of you don’t wanna hear it! It’s just a fact, just sayin’.
You know who would love to see RR retain his job? I’ll make a list, tell me what you think?
-OSU fans and coaches
-MSU fans and coaches
-PSU fans and coaches
-Illini fans and coaches
-Pur fans and coaches
-Iowa fans and coaches
RR is 0-fer against the aforementioned, 14 games collectively I believe. Please no more RR.
Also, I hated that he moved his show from Sunday morns to Thurs afternnons, I mean he took all the fun out of that. He always says the players need to do better, well what about him? Huh? He is underachieving plain and simple, I don’t need charts and vagaries for that fact!
Go and get Harbaugh, please, I’m begging you Mr. Brandon!
msu and osu fans want rich rod to get fired. if that happens, michigan will be set back another two years at least. If you want to be below .500 for the next two years, fire rich rod. if rich rod goes we lose at least 30 to 6 against alabama in Texas ON NATIONAL FREAKING TV in 2012. Whereas, we keep rich rod, have maybe the best offense in college football next year and, hopefully, an improved defense. I mean, the defense can only get better at this point. Firing rich rod means we lose the best player in college football AGAIN!!!!!! )mallet leaving when carr got fired) I have this sinking feeling that the SAME FREAKING MICHIGAN FANS THAT WANTED LOYD CARR GONE WANT RICH ROD GONE NOW!!!! DONT LISTEN TO THEM!!!!! They are band wagon fans who want to win a “mythical” michigan way, then win at all.
Why the hell would msu and osu fans want him fired, are you kidding me? He’s been pathetic against them, don’t kid your self, they love what’s going on!!! Carr lost to osu too often in his waning years but alot of times there were injuries such as 05’, 07’ (when healthy we beat Fla in our bowl game). In 06’ we were a late hit from getting the ball back for a possible winning drive and osu was not stopping us very well at the end of that game, and if we had won, who knows, we sure in the hell aren’t Fla’s bitch like osu is! Might have been an NC year!!!
As far you worrying about the next couple years if we fire RR, well if you bring in a competent coach we will be fine. I could give you a myriad of examples but I’m sure most people don’t need me to do that. We are a smart enough fan base to know that!
by SanDiegoMick on Nov 3, 2010 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Well stated!
I think he has one 2 games against Big Ten teams in the past two years, is this acceptable???
Time to cut our losses and move on. What about Cowher? Would he be interested? His popularity might help with recruiting and he would definately be an “in your face” coach who would NOT tolerate poor tackling. RR makes Dantonio look like a genius.
by DCowboyfootball on Nov 3, 2010 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Move Sagesse to nose tackle
With Mike Martin with two bad ankles, moving Sagesse back to nose tackle is a must. Adam Patterson has underachieved his entire career and is getting pushed back consistently. Sagesse isn’t even close to Mike Martin, but he should be an improvement over Patterson.
amen.
sadly, I don’t think they will. This defensive staff seems to be dead set on their initial impressions of players and I doubt they’re going to change now.
sigh….
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Nov 3, 2010 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions
"look at the film"
what bothers me the most about RR is how the number of times he responds to presser questions with, “We’ll have to look at the film to see what happened.” YOU ARE THE HEAD COACH. YOU STAND ON THE FIELD. How are you supposed to make any sort of adjustments during a game if you have to wait to “look at the film” afterwards to see what’s going on???
Regardless of what happens, I still think he should get one more year.
regressing as seasons go on
That’s another thing that has driven me crazy w/RR. How come our teams don’t improve during the season? This was a Bo staple, there were so many years where we had young guys at key positions but somehow Bo whipped them into shape.
That’s what great coaches do, not this crap we’ve had to endure under RR. Nothing but excuses!!!
Also, we used to sign top 10, if not top 5 recruiting classes year in and year out, I’m not seeing that anymore either, alot of people are in denial about this guy.
You Jinxed it DAVE!!!
“Suggestion Five: Bench J.T. Floyd.”
The latest bit of bad news arrived Wednesday, as Wolverines coach Rich Rodriguez confirmed that cornerback J.T. Floyd will miss the rest of the season after suffering a “freak” ankle injury in practice Tuesday.
We need to implement some sort of rule……

by 




















