7 Reasons why Texas joining the Big Ten is a Win Win for College Football, Texas, the Big Ten and the Big XII
You read that right. Texas joining the Big Ten is good for everyone. Really. And by "everyone" I mean the Big Ten, my conference. Er... wait. This is supposed to be persuasive. I mean the royal "everyone." Yeah. That's it.
Texas to the Big Ten is a pipe dream. It won't happen. Even so, it must happen. It's too good not to happen. I've thought this through. Really. I have. And Texas in the Big Ten makes more sense than you'd think. To prove it, I put together 7 reasons why Texas joining the Big Ten is good for everyone.
Let me put this out there: I don't pretend to believe that any of this holds water. Texas joining the Big Ten is good for two parties: Texas and Big Ten. The Big XII gets hosed bad if this happens. And not in a "my girlfriend left and she took the dog" kind of way. In a "I just watched my family get mauled by a bear" kind of way.
The True Face of Big Ten Expansion
You can't strip a conference of a national championship caliber program (in women's and men's sports) and not expect some bad things to happen. It's not like Texas is the Big XII. Far from it. Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, etc. The Big XII would survive. Easily. But there'd be a little less money in the conference and less pre-season OMGMNC!!1!!! talk. It's a noticeable hit.
So there's that. But let's face it, I want Texas in the Big Ten. For it to work though, there needs to be some way to rationalize it. Lies. Damn lies. And statistics kind of rationalizations. So let's get to it.
![]() |
And it's not just the Big Ten that makes out like a bandit here. The Big XII will collect plenty out of this too. All of a sudden every time Texas plays Oklahoma or A&M it's not just a local conference showdown, it's an interconference grudge match. All of a sudden the advertising revenues skyrocket. Sure the conference is used to keeping all that money, but the influx of Big Ten centric advertising will make the A&M game a real money maker again. It'll jack up the rates for the Red River Rivalry. It'll also create a huge boost in Big XII centric purchasing from member schools because of the....
2. Bad Blood - Nothing makes for better television than estranged lovers fighting. Look at how much money Jerry Springer made off of it. If Texas left the Big XII for the Big 11 Ten, oh baby, RAGE! As if the Red River Rivalry needed to be more intense. If this happens, ESPN, ABC, CBS, FOX, etc... will play this angle through the roof. It will take on a life of its own, driving up fan interest and fan investment in the new Big Ten Big XII rivalry that literally will have appeared over night. All of a sudden there will be a raging battle for the football soul of Middle America. The war of northern aggression will be reignited in the Big XII. Anger. Rage. Hate. All the things we need to make sports awesome.
3. It Gets Austin out of Texas - Let's face it. The hippies in Austin have always been the odd balls of the Big XII. Austin is this tiny island of liberalism in the vast sea of conservatism that is the Big XII. And I'm not talkin' politics people. Austin is... well... different than the rest of Texas and the Big XII. Wait. Maybe not Colorado. Definitely not Colorado. With the amount of ganja eeking out from under the dorm room doors in Boulder, Colorado belongs in Caribbean more than the Big XII. But I digress. Austin has a Big Ten town kind of feel. Minus the three feet of snow.
They also have the pre-requisite ratio of supernerds in their student populous to blend into the Big Ten immediately. Further, once free of the Big XII's requirement of caging each schools nerd population UT's nerds could save the world. Imagine once they release their nerds from their wire mesh cages and allow them to free range, the sky's the limit on what they can accomplish. If keeping them under lock and key nets you the Godzillatron, Austin in the Big Ten will cure cancer in three years.
Now you see the benefit. Everyone wins. Texas is no longer a refuge for dirty hippies in the Big XII and we cure cancer in the same swipe. So if you don't want Texas in the Big Ten, well, you're for cancer.
(more reasons after the Jump....)
4. TCU Joins a Real Conference - I don't see how anyone can argue that this is a good thing. The only thing we argue about is who has to take the bullet on this one. It's like the group of dudes who knows that every one of them will score if one of them takes the fat ugly girl home. But no one's quite willing to do it yet. The solution? Either get one of your buddies really, really drunk or take advantage of his vulnerability over a recent break up. Since we can't get an entire conference drunk at once (actually, yes we can, we have those kinds of powers: behold the SEC. Booyah, you're wasted), we'll happily take advantage of a recent breakup to convince the Big XII to jump on the grenade.
So let's talk up "her" good traits. Dude, this is a win for everyone. TCU's from old money, it was South West Conference member, so it was in a "national championship worthy" conference before. Athletically they can play with the big boys. Come on dude, you let Baylor is in the Big XII for pete's sake, so don't tell me you've got "standards". Their football program is top notch. They've got a decent (at least not horrible) basketball team. They're a damn good baseball program, too. Plus, their cheerleaders are haaaaaawt. TCU's already in Texas, even. So it's like nothing changed. They're the same really. Another drink? Here you go buddy.
Look, TCU in the Big XII benefits everyone. Whether you like the BCS or not, it ain't going anywhere. There's just too much money at stake. So the best thing we can do as major conferences is to swallow up the upstarts. If the Big XII swallows up TCU there's one less "small" school out there screwing with the BCS. Plus, TCU just played in a BCS game this season, just like Texas. The game was a snoozer, just like Texas. They lost, just like Texas. They're the exact same.
That's it. Go over and talk to her.
5. The Conferences start to make sense - This actually benefits everyone. Really. As good as a conference as the Big XII has been, it's been top heavy. The Big XII South has repressed the Big XII North with a brutal prejudice over the last decade. It's been ugly. Kansas and Nebraska have been okay, and Colorado has sobered up long enough make the occasional Big XII championship game, but the South has been dominant. And it's getting stronger. Texas Tech and Oklahoma State have risen to prominence, Texas and Oklahoma continue to dominate, even Baylor's becoming respectable, and A&M will eventually get its act together. Frankly, Texas' absence from the Big XII south might be a godsend for the teams not named Oklahoma (though OU does get an obvious benefit). Throw TCU into the South and all of a sudden you've got a more balanced, more competitive Big XII.
For the Big 11 Ten, all of a sudden you not only have a balanced schedule and divisions, you get the conference championship game everyone's been begging for since the SEC decided to ruin the concept of the regular season so many years ago. You could finally divide up the Big Ten into East and West and actually have balanced conference divisions. In the West: Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Texas, Illinois, Northwestern. In the East: Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State, Indiana, Penn State, Purdue. At first blush, that's a pretty good split. Three heavy hitters in each division, a bottom feeder a piece, and two aspiring programs. Works out pretty well in basketball too.
So with Texas in the Big Ten, all of a sudden you've got a more competitive and balanced Big XII. You've also got a functional, properly expanded Big Ten with a championship game. If you take one argument away from my twisted logic, take this one.
6. There are no extra travel costs involved for either Conference - One thing I keep hearing is how much more expensive it will be for Texas to play it's road games, and that's a reason not to do the deal. Uh. No. Have to ever tried to get to Lubbock from...well... anywhere? It's not only impossible but expensive as hell. If Texas joins the Big Ten their travel costs don't change. There's a major airport in Austin and most of the Big Ten schools are located on top of or within spitting distance of a major airport. Plus, have you seen how big Texas is physically? It's as far to El Paso from Dallas as it is from Dallas to Chicago. There's a little more distance involved, but not enough to make it cost prohibitive or even to make it matter. Further, if like I suggest TCU is picked to replace UT, well, nothing changes in-conference for the Big XII.
7. It Creates a Basketball Super Conference - That's right Big East, suck it. Michigan State, Wisconsin, Ohio State, Purdue, Indiana (think of the history), Michigan (ditto, bitches), Illinois, Minnesota, Iowa (eventually, right? Please? Dammit....), and now Texas. You're looking at a twelve team conference that year in year out will send seven to eight teams to the NCAA tournament. Hell, there's an outside chance at ten teams in a season. In a word, awesome.
So there you go. Seven well thought out reasons Texas should join the Big Ten. I'm open for more great reasons. There are a few more minor ones. Another great point would be the advantage of a swimming super conference. Michigan and Texas in the same league. As a former swimmer, this would be awesome beyond compare. Then there's baseball, Texas adds instant credibility to the Big Ten and allows the rest of Big Ten the ability to play against top flight talent on a regular basis.
So give me some good reasons that it shouldn't work. No, wait. Actually don't. I don't want to hear it.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pure Columbian Awesome.
Enough for every member of the Big Ten to feed its athletes nothing but kobe veal feed giant lobsters for breakfast lunch and dinner on disposable plates made out of dinosaur bones, all while leaving enough left over for each school start its own space program.
You could have stopped here. Your post already wins the internet.
by formerlyanonymous on Feb 16, 2010 11:24 AM CST reply actions
Teh Winnnar?
Iz me.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Feb 16, 2010 11:32 AM CST up reply actions
much worse for everyone's bcs chances
conferences are limited to two bcs participants. texas goes from a sure bcs bid every year to having to fight with the big10 for bids. and all the big 10 participants see their chances drop as texas horns in.
Good points...
everyone takes a little bit of a hit, but the conference is stronger as a result and there is so much more money involved because the Big Ten spreads to Texas (the state). It’s a whole new world for Big Ten recruiting and marketing. The amount of money involved trumps having to work harder to make a BCS bowl.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Feb 16, 2010 12:32 PM CST up reply actions
Bwahahaha
This is one of the greatest posts I’ve read in awhile. I am smack dab in the middle of Big 12 country, and a Baylor Alum. As nice as it sounds not to see Texas on the schedule every year for every sport, it can’t happen. It won’t happen. Texas lawmakers won’t let it happen. Football is a religion here, and the annual A&M/Texas Tech/Texas OU/TX even Baylor/TX are more popular than church on Sundays…even in Texas. You may have read a blog that’s out there about a phone call to the Texas Gov. Wherever Texas goes, A&M must follow. That’s pretty much the case. A&M and UT must, I repeat must be in the same conference battling for the same conference title in every sport from football to rowing. It’s fun to think about, but the reality of Texas joining the Big Ten just won’t happen, for religious reasons alone.
What? Even in the land of Six Flags over Jesus?
Ha. I know it’s far fetched, but it’s fun to think about. I went to high school in Dallas, so I’m well acquainted with the difficulty in making this even a remote possibility. For what it’s worth, I think the BT would consider taking both UT and A&M, but then we’d have to go all super conference and expand to 14. And at that point, we’re in the same mess, looking for one more school.
Maybe be can get UCLA…. hmmmmmmmm….
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Feb 16, 2010 5:05 PM CST up reply actions
Any analysis that uses Scrooge McDuck's Moneybin
is sound analysis in my book.
DuckTales a-WOO-ooo!
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
In a “I just watched my family get mauled by a bear” kind of way.
And then the bear kicked you in the nuts.
Great reasoning, and sweet Baby Jesus would we love to see this happen, if nothing else for the Cloverfieldtron to make an appearance outside of Cowboys Stadium.
Check out Detroit4Lyfe & The Gordie Howe Hat Trick
Hold on a second...
1) Travel Costs won’t change much – Ummm, when you furthest conference opponent in Iowa now becomes your closest, I don’t think you need “Are you Smarter than a 5th grader?” to see that your travel costs from football to swimming to tennis will skyrocket. I know everyone is focusing on football, but can you imagine Augie planning travel for 2 or 3 game sets in Ann Arbor and Columbus vs. Lubbock and Waco? The mythical $10 million extra Texas would gain per year joining the Big 10 would be eaten up little by little with travel
2) Texas Politics is actually king in Texas not football – No state legislator is going to go quietly into the night letting Texas overnight bring in 5 home games a year with Big 10 conference opponents, who in turn begin massive recruiting stints while in the state. The Borg will have invaded!?! Moreover, unless the Big 10 takes another Texas school with them, the potential affect on not playing against non-conference Texas schools as well as ending of age-old rivalries will also impact financially in certain areas. Let me be blunt – If Ann Richards in the early 90s was able to get Texas, A&M, and Tech to HAVE to take Baylor with them for the Big 12 to come to fruition, I am thinking there will be some backdoor smoke-filled room negotiations before Texas leaves for the frozen Tundra of the North
3) Texas playing critical games in the month of November in snow? Uhh…Mack says thanks, but no thanks. If travel costs and Red Tape aren’t bad enough, kids playing in the snow will be a morale killer.
Nothing against the Big 10. I think the conference is incredible and to be a part of it would be historical. However, to think that there are so many more benefits that override the cons to this deal IF Texas were the only Texas school to go, it borders more on hysterical…
"I've never gone into a game trying to win the Heisman Trophy; I go into a game trying to win." - Colt McCoy
It could work
provided the Big 10 takes A&M as well.
1) Travel Costs – Not a big deal, marginal increase. The major problem is that Texans love to see UT in Texas, anywhere. To ensure a constant presence in the state Texas would have to play a pretty much fixed non conference schedule. Rice, Oklahoma, Baylor, TxTech. That would ensure 4 OOC Texas Games. Add the A&M game and that makes 5 guaranteed Texas games every year. If the big 10 keeps the 8 conference game format that means there are going to be either 3 or 4 games played in Austin in addition to those games, that makes 8-9 games played in the state of Texas, and only 3-4 out of the state.
2.) Texas Politics – This one is easy. Take Texas and A&M out of the Big 12 and aggressively lobby to replace them with TCU and Houston. Texas goes from 4 BCS conference teams to 6 overnight. Big XII keeps critical games in Texas, stay on TV in the Texas markets as well. Overall win for the state of Texas, and yes the overall balance in the Big 12 is improved, while maintaining a heavy presence in Texas, the conferences life blood. It might even be prudent to go ahead and and talk to Rice as well (in case the Pac 10 snags Colorado, but maybe BYU is a better fit).
3.) Texas afraid of the snow? Hardly. Texas does not run from teams, other teams run from Texas (Arkansas and BYU both backed out of last years matchup at the last minute.) Anyway as TX/A&M will always be the last game of the season, the real last road game will probably be in the second or third week of November. It’ll be chilly no doubt, but it’s hardly a blizzard every year. More than likely the game will be against a divisional opponent as well so most likely the road games to Happy Valley, Ann Arbor or Columbus would be happening in September, probably in prime time. Conference officials aren’t dumb, they want to put an entertaining product on TV. This also reduces the possibility of instant rematches in a conference championship game.
I hope this happens. It would improve the Big 10 as a conference while adding Texas into the BTN network footprint. I have seen people suggest Rutgers and Syracuse as suitable expansion sites, but I am of the opinion that though they might add the NYC market, it would damage the overall brand of the Big 10, putting it further behind the SEC, and potentially a 12 team Pac 10 with Utah and Colorado. I don’t see them expanding in a way that would damage the overall prestige of the Big 10 nationally. That being said I think there are only 3 real options.
1. Add Texas and A&M, put the screws to Norte Dame, but leave a place open if they decline. 13 member conference can still have championship game.
2. Add Nebraska and Missouri, again leave spot for Notre Dame- Midwest contiguous states with either high tv market value (MO) or national prestige (NE). Missouri makes up for Nebraska lack of TVs. Nebraska makes up for Missouri’s lack of fans and sports winning tradition. Missouri TV sets more likely to be on college sports than NY fans. Nebraska fans more likely to travel to games than NY teams.
3. Add only Notre Dame – self explanatory and the easiest solution.
again adding Rutgers, Syracuse, Pitt, Maryland, VA et al. may put the Big 10 network on more TV’s in NYC but fewer people would follow the Big 10 nationally as the view of the casual fan would be of a more mid tier northeastern based conference instead of a top flight mid western conference.

by 























