NCAA Investigating West Virginia Football for Violations: "Unnamed Source" Points Finger at Michigan's Rich Rodriguez
It was only a matter of time until something else hit the news on this. ESPN is reporting that NCAA investigators recently started sniffing around Morgantown for any indication of NCAA Rules Violations my the Mountaineer football program. Details are fuzzy, which is to say they are non-existent. The West Virginia primary and athletic websites do not (as of the time of this post) have a press release on the investigation. The sole source on this is ESPN's Mark Shlabach, who is generally reliable in reporting the comings and goings of college football's news worthy topics.
The important part of the story is that West Virginia is being investigated. But investigated for what? The phrase "rules violations" could mean anything and usually does. At this time no one seems to know what the (if any) allegations actually are and no one seems to have an idea of what the time frame is for the investigation. All we know is that the NCAA was in Morgantown interviewing people... for something. Naturally, the finger was immediately pointed at Rodriguez:
West Virginia officials wouldn't comment on the specifics of the allegations, but a source close to the situation said the allegations center around former Mountaineers coach and current Michigan coach Rich Rodriguez.
I love that the specifics can't be commented on, but the school (and I'm not taking a long leap to assume someone at WVU leaked this) is happy to indicate the only reason the NCAA came calling was because of Rodriguez.
Sadly, it's not much of a jump at this point. The NCAA does have the duty of due diligence in making it's allegations against any school. The fact that they've leveled charges against Rodriguez means that they would be somewhat remiss if they didn't check into his prior places of employment. Are the alleged violations a one time occurrence or are these long standing issues?
But why would this revelation come out now? Hell, we don't even know when the investigators showed up at WVU's doorstep. The school won't comment on when, where and who (other than throwing Rodriguez under the bus). However, Schlabach just announced that the visit was within the last 45 days.
Shouldn't the NCAA have done this due diligence months ago, before they started throwing around terms like "major violation?" To begin a subsequent investigation on a coach, and by default his current employer seems, patently unfair when their response to the NCAA's present set of allegations against that coach and school are due by the end of this week. The flip side of this argument is that the NCAA shouldn't rest on its laurels after the first shoe is dropped. They should continue to investigate potential wrong doings. This is true. But it's not like this is something that just dropped in their lap or as if it wasn't known that Rodriguez used to work at West Virginia.
If the two investigations are in fact related, it is just a sign of how incredibly sloppy and inept the NCAA compliance and investigation departments truly are. If you're building a case, you get all the details before you go to hearing. You don't set the hearing, allow the other side to reply to your allegations, and then say "oh, by the way..." It is certainly within the NCAA's ability to do this, but it makes them look like they're on a witch hunt rather than actually and competently doing their duty.
I think it's also suspect if the NCAA gives any undue weight to any unsupported "testimony" originating from Morgan town. The bad blood between West Virginia and it's former head coach could fill an aquifer. And most, if not all, of that bad blood flows from Morgantown toward Rodriguez' mail box. If there are things to substantiate violations (documents, recordings, etc...), fine. My biggest concern is unsubstantiated allegations. It's not like Rodriguez or Michigan will have an attorney there to cross examine anyone. The whole thing just reeks at this point.
How does this impact Rodriguez and Michigan? Right now, it doesn't. The NCAA is notorious for punishing the school where the violations occurred rather than the coach in his new digs. If you need proof, look at Steve Fischer, John Calipari, and Kelvin Sampson. Every one of these bozos managed to get their former employers in all kinds of trouble, yet walked scott-free because they weren't employed by the school they screwed anymore. I'm not comparing Rodriguez to any of these guys, but if they can walk after the crap they've pulled, the allegations against Rodriguez aren't even in the same galaxy seem to indicate little would happen to him and Michigan as a result of a WVU investigation.
Right now, this means little to nothing for Michigan fans because there's so little to go on. All we have is hearsay that the questioning mostly centered around how much time players were doing football related activities and Rodriguez stewardship of the program. But we also know that the NCAA was asking all kinds of other non-Rodriguez related questioning. So who the hell knows what actually happened or what the goal of all this is?
While it might not mean too much in the grand scheme of things, it does mean we get to sit through another week to a month of Rodriguez and Michigan bashing in the press.
Sigh.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They're just not going to let him coach
The problem that Rodriguez has, or rather, the problem that Brandon has that will directly impact Rodriguez is the fact that the last positive headline for Michigan Football on ESPN or any other media outlet has been under the Carr administration.
There have been some highlights – I think probably that the Notre Dame game probably garnered some “positive” headlines, but by in large, the media perception – and thus the perception of 90% of casual fans and 100% of the sports-watching public – is negative. And it’s been that way for some time.
At a certain point, and I can speak from a “brand management” perspective, I think Brandon and Coleman and whoever else is in charge have to have the discussion of “should we fire this guy?”
Don’t get me wrong – it would be a travesty, and it would be factually wrong, but it’s become clear that the media, who is primarily responsible for defining the “brand”, is not going to let Rich Rodriguez be the coach of this team.
I’m just worried about that possibility. This is largely rambling, and probably a part of a larger post…
http://maizenbrew.com
Get it?
Well...
You’re right about the perception, it’s infuriating. That said, you can’t fire a guy because of negative publicity… I mean what has he done, that anyone can prove, to merit being fired? Won three conference games in two years I suppose, but that’s not the issue that’s being covered here. We have to keep in mind here that the vast majority of the negative media attention has been contrived, conjectured, and in other instances built completely on false premises or premises that have been covered in facades to make a non-story something sensational. Brand management applied in the Moeller issue I suppose, where the guys actions directly brought negative attention on the university, but that hasn’t been the case here. Again, until something can actually be levied against the guy, you can’t talk about getting rid of him for the negative attention.
Meanwhile a few miles away there’s a coach who re-instates felons onto his football team and nobody so much as bats an eyelash, all because he’s managed to exceed the expectations there and achieve mind-numbing mediocrity.
GO BLUE! http://www.maizenbrew.com/
Although....
If Michigan was coming off a ten win season, nobody — and I mean nobody — would care. Losing multiple games and losing to pretty much everybody in the big ten will not let Rodriguez be the coach of Michigan.
At the end of the day, you just have to think Rodriguez was a poor choice. His hiring has weakened a storied program. That’s it. Either he’ll start winning and people will not care about this stuff or he won’t and the program will need a couple more years to recycle and win.
WVU Officials Release Statement in Response to ESPN Article on Rodriguez Investigation
Thay have been under investigation – for over a year.
According to WBOY:
“MORGANTOWN — West Virginia University athletic officials released a statement Tuesday in response to a report by ESPN on the NCAA investigation into possible rules violations by former football coach Rich Rodriguez.
The University of Michigan, where Rodriguez coaches now, has been under investigation since last year, for rules violations under his watch.
The ESPN report says that WVU officials were recently interviewed about potential violations at WVU.
WVU’s only comment on the situation is the statement below:
“The NCAA has met with individuals involved with the West Virginia University football program to identify any potential rules violations. The University has fully cooperated with the NCAA during this process. West Virginia University and its Department of Intercollegiate Athletics is committed to operating its athletic program in conformance with the legislation and policy of the NCAA and the Big East conference. No additional comments will be made regarding the matter at this time.”
http://www.wboy.com/story.cfm?func=viewstory&storyid=78208
No one has thrown Richard under the bus but… Richard.
Thanks
Appreciate the update. The Shlabach interview on ESPN said that the NCAA had been there in the last 45 days.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Apr 13, 2010 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions
How far will this go?
So, now the Freep’s got Michigan, and potentially WVU. Where will it stop? Will they go back to Clemson? Tulane? Glenville St? Will they start looking at other programs, or limit the investigation to places Rodriguez coached?
Since WVU didn’t self-report, will they get Bill Stewart for continuing with the violations? Or did they stop when Rodriguez left?
What I’m concerned about is a wanton disrespect for the rules here. It seems to me that it’s more a case of trying to creatively skirt the rules than blatantly disregard them, though bailing on the spirit of the law might also come into play. And I could be way wrong on that, in which case what we get, sadly, is deserved.

by 

















