Maize n Brew: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Notre Dame, Nebraska Involved in Expensive Game of Big Ten Expansion Chicken

I miss the old days. If you wanted to play "chicken" you could. Without anyone really getting hurt. As a kid you'd hop on your Big Wheel/Skateboard/Bike and peddle at one another until someone else veered off. It was great fun, that is, until someone actually got hurt. On the big wheel or the skateboard, it didn't hurt too bad. You were small, flexible, capable of recovering from just about any scrape, cut, or broken bone in about an hour. But once you got a little bigger, and started moving a little faster, those stakes went up in a hurry. You realized, for the first time in some instances, that holy crap, this could really, really hurt.

The more that comes out on Big Ten and conference expansion in general, the more it becomes obvious that this particualr high stakes game of chicken that isn't going to end well for anyone without the sense to get out of the way of the bus.  It's also becoming more and more obvious that this game of chicken is being played in the dead of night, and every driver involved has his lights off.

For all the speculation regarding Nebraska joining the Big Ten, there seems to be something missing from the equation. What could it be.... oh yeah! An inviteJust little details.

A source told ESPN.com that Nebraska is "leaning toward" the Big Ten but is waiting for a formal invitation from the conference before acting.

I see how this works now. I'm also "leaning toward consummating" a relationship with Charlize Theron, but I'm waiting on a formal invitation. Maybe if I announce how willing I am, it'll happen. See what I mean about driving with your lights off?

Now Nebraska wouldn't be taking measures like this, or quietly holding ontobroadcasting their intentions to anyone with a microphone, if they didn't have something to go on. I think. But then again, it was widely assumed Colorado would announce it was bolting for the Pac 10 last night. Only they didn't. In fact all they announced was that there was nothing to announce, only that they'd talked to their lawyers about what to do in the event an offer was extended.

It's not fair to say that Nebraska has talked itself into a corner on this one, because they really haven't. Media speculation has driven this bus from day one, and I suspect a no nonsense kind of guy like Tom Osborne really does want to end this discussion as soon as possible so that it's no longer a distraction to the University, its athletes and alumni. But Nebraska has left enough dangling quotes and non-committal statements out in the breeze to let everyone even remotely tuned into the situation know that if a better deal is out there, they'll listen.

That better deal is, presumptively, the Big Ten. But the Big Ten hasn't officially offered anyone anything. There are only two surefire, confirmed targets of the Big Ten's affection: Texas and Notre Dame. Both schools would prefer to remain where they are, but of the two Texas is the one with options. Notre Dame currently sits on the outside looking in at any kind of college football realignment. While they would love to preserve their independence, the realities of a five super-conference future in college football make that independence a hindrance. At a certain point, conference realignment will rob many crucial rivalries of their conference season match up, forcing them to be played OOC. As those out of conference spaces start to fill, the likelihood that Notre Dame will find willing dance partners will start to diminish. There are only so many tough games teams are willing to schedule in a season.

Star-divide

Further, the super-conference model also points to gargantuan revenue sharing that even mighty Notre Dame can't turn down. As Corn Nation points out, the Big Ten's Committee on Institutional Cooperation receives 12% of federal research funds, a number that will only increase as the Conference adds additional research based schools. With Notre Dame's recent re-dedication to research and graduate education, this is a pool of money that the school would be foolish to turn down because its football team wants an independent schedule. At a certain point, athletics don't matter in this equation, it's the research money that does. A slice of that research money pie may very well dwarf whatever payout a cable or network television contract provides. And just so we're clear, the CIC received $3.5 Billion in federal funding in 2006-2007.

The Big Ten has never shied away from clearly demonstrating that Notre Dame is the object of its affections in this whole expansion push, but at a certain point even a jilted admirer moves on. With Nebraska set to announce its "intentions" on Friday, everyone's timeline on expansion has been moved forward. Even Notre Dame's. Something is going to happen in the near term, which will significantly affect not just college football, but institutional research across the midwest. And the three schools (Texas, Nebraska, and Notre Dame) with a say in how this change will be implemented seem to be waiting for the other to blink first.

Texas has made it clear to all parties involved, it doesn't have to blink or move. Regardless of how expansion proceeds, Texas will have a comfortable conference home of some kind and access to enough federal research grants to keep it happy. Sure they might get more football and research money in the Big Ten, but right now they control their current conference and their own destiny, and there is no rush to change today or in the next twenty years. Texas will always have that advantage.

Nebraska and Notre Dame do not. Nebraska has been fed up with the revenue sharing in its conference for years and does not have the institutional research support from their conference that Big Ten members possess. Worse, geographically they are somewhat isolated from the rest of the college football landscape other than the Big XII and Big Ten. As a result, they are presently on the outside looking in at two separate conference powerplays between the Pac 10 and Big Ten, which at present only just officially included them.

Notre Dame faces a different, but equally troubling challenge. As one of the last remaining football independents, the Irish have tied a significant amount of their alumni capital to the notion that being independent somehow makes the Irish more special than any other program. Whether this is a reality or not, it is a powerful factor in their ultimate decision. And an immensely complicating one. The monetary rationales for joining the Big Ten should far outweigh the school's attachment to it's own notion of football independence. What should be the most troubling factor for the Irish is that they, ultimately, control whether college football is turned upside down or not.

If they act, and join the Big Ten, the majority of the status quo of college football may well be left intact. If they don't college football completely changes and they are left scrambling to fill a football schedule and their research coffers.

The simple fact is that both schools are racing head long into the oncoming Big Ten/Conference Expansion bus. One of them can stop the whole process by turning away, but is too proud to do it. The other's steering is locked won't turn away unless it's tires blow out. The one who turns away, and joins the Big Ten, gets a seat on the bus.

The other gets run over by it.

0 recs  |  Comment 6 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I agree with everything that you are saying but to follow through a little ...

There are still a lot of buts and howevers to get through. Fortunately, they will probably be in sequential order:
1) If the Domers say Yes to the Big Ten, all this is probably over.
2) If the Domers say No then the Big Ten actually has to follow through on their expansion plans. They might just be bluffing.
3) If the follow through with their plans, I think they will go after Nebraska but I don’t think they will go after Missouri. They might just stand at 12 and stop. They may add more but who is going to add enough to be given an equal share? Rutgers (don’t make me laugh), Pitt (they do have Penn State in their corner)… There just isn’t a lot out there at this point.
4) If the Big 12 loses two teams, they may add two teams (TCU and Utah) or maybe they make a run at Arkansas.
5) If the Big 12 does fold, then the some people will go to the PAC10 and some will band together with the MWC.
6) If the Big 12 folds, then the SEC might choose not to do anything. I don’t think they want to change their status quo right now.
7) If the ACC doesn’t lose anyone then they will stand pat on things to.

I think there is a really good chance that the Big 10 adds just one team, Notre Dame or Nebraska. That’s it.

Respectfully, pfhokie

by pfhokie on Jun 9, 2010 1:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Why do people think Texas is going to the Pac 10 anyways?

I haven’t yet to hear or read anything about Texas even WANTING to go to the Pac-10. $$ And who’s to say that with an offer extension to Nebraska, Texas, T A&M and OU wouldn’t be getting one next?$$ If Texas is Big10 material so is OU. Every reason they(the media) said about not wanting to join the Big 10 holds true for the Pac-10. $$ And if the Pac-10 goes to 16, then the Big 10 and SEC will follow, which will kill 2 conferences(Big East and Big XII). $$ Let’s not assume If Nebraska leaves, there will be a Pac-16. It’s more likely the Big 12 replaces 1 or 2 schools that leave. Arkansas isn’t leaving, for the same reason Indiana, Northwestern and Purdue wont leave the Big 10, they make too much money, competitive or not. Do you think Boise State and Utah would have an issue replacing Nebraska and Missouri if it came to? Or any Conference USA team? It seems to me that it would be more likely that Texas would want to play in the Big 10 than the Pac-10. $3.1B in research dollars? and (with Texas and 4 other schools) $25M from football? Let’s not forget what this is about…$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

by Christian A. Robinson on Jun 9, 2010 2:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Looks like it's a done deal.

I think the reason Texas wanted in is that the Pac 10 is another conference they could, essentially, bully. They can insist on an unequal revenue plan, take their friends with them, and only have USC to compete with in name. It’s shallow and selfish, but it will work on for them, because they’re the biggest.

It never gets to be easy

by chitownhawkeye on Jun 9, 2010 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Expansion

The best Big 10 expansion scenario includes securing Texas, New York / New Jersey, and Notre Dame. The best 5 expansion teams include Texas A&M, Notre Dame, Texas, Syracuse and Rutgers. Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Missouri and Nebraska are alternates. Texas and Texas A&M are a must to secure Texas. Syracuse and Rutgers are a must to secure New York / New Jersey. All of the top teams are part of the AAU except Notre Dame and all are ranked in the top 100 academically by US News & World Report. More importantly, these schools represent 50 million plus in state population.

The best Pac 10 expansion scenario includes securing Texas and the remainder of the Western USA. The best 6 expansion teams include Texas A&M, Texas, Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska. Texas A&M and Texas are a must to secure Texas. Utah, BYU and Missouri are alternates. All of the top teams are part of the AAU except Oklahoma and all of the schools are ranked close to or in the top 100 academically by US News & World Report except for Utah. More importantly, these schools represent 33 million plus in state population.

by Dream B on Jun 9, 2010 5:10 PM CDT reply actions  

Some flaws in the analysis, Dream B.

Interesting stats. It’s welcome to see a serious attempt to consider academic strengths. Still, this assessment overlooks some key ingredients.

First: travel time and expense. If building a far-flung conference that covers a lot of turf and incorporates big metropolitan areas were the path to success, the Big East would be the daddy of them all today and the SEC would be counting its pennies. That’s not how it works. Entertainment value matters more: teams and rivalries viewers care about.

Second: ND brings in a big chunk of the NY market. If the Big Ten+ gets ND, there is little reason for the conference to divide the pie by adding Syracuse or Rutgers, which add less value after that.

Third: Your Pac-10 analysis doesn’t address the ‘Tech problem’ in Texas politics. ‘Securing’ Texas means finding an acceptable conference home for three schools, not just two.

Last: Flawed premise overall. It’s not simply a matter of adding states and markets to create an empire. If things really worked this way, the Pac-10 would be sunk with its two-by-two approach and the SEC would be a lot poorer conference than it is. These conferences do well because they offer recognisable and intriguing identities (‘brands’). The TV numbers for an Alabama-Auburn clash are far greater than the popualtion figures for their state—or their towns—would suggest. The TV numbers for a Rutgers-Louisville matchup are lower. There’s more involved.

Abiaka Windclan

>>>----------------------->

by Abiaka Windclan on Jun 10, 2010 1:20 AM CDT reply actions  

expansion

Either Texas leads an exodus of five teams to the Pac-10 that follow Colorado or it remains true to the Big 12 and the league becomes more reminiscent of the old Southwest Conference.

http://philiptortora.blogspot.com/2010/06/future-of-big-12-hinges-on-texas.html

by philtort on Jun 10, 2010 4:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An Unofficial Michigan Football Blog that covers everything related to the University of Michigan Wolverines. We also cover beer, tailgating and the absurdity of college sports in general.
Start posting about the Wolverines »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Boise State quarterback Kellen Moore (11) throws a deep pass in the first quarter against Louisiana Tech during their NCAA college football game in Ruston, La., Friday, Nov. 6, 2009. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis)

No. 3 Boise State And No. 10 Virginia Tech Provide Exciting Finish To Opening Weekend

ATLANTA - SEPTEMBER 4: Russell Shepard #10 of the LSU Tigers runs down the field for a touchdown against the North Carolina Tar Heels at the Georgia Dome September 4 2010 in Atlanta Georgia.  (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images) +11 updates

LSU (Barely) Holds Off Depleted UNC, 30-24

Jacksonville State players celebrate their 49-48 double-overtime victory over Mississippi in an NCAA college football game in Oxford, Miss., Saturday, Sept. 4, 2010. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis) +3 updates

Jacksonville State Pulls Major Upset, Stuns Ole Miss In Double Overtime

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Maizenbrew_small Maize n Brew Dave

Editors

James_dean_smiling2_small Beauford

Authors

Small mzgoblue

Mgoblue_small SCM

Mhn_standalone_puckw_small MHNet