Why the calendar matters when it comes to THE GAME
I respectfully disagree with Dave's take on this one, there are some things that are indeed still sacred in this game that we all cherish so much, and Michigan vs Ohio State to end the regular season of college football for each team is one of them. Not many of you need a lesson on the rivalry, but perhaps what is needed here is a refocusing on just why this rivalry is the be-all-end-all when it comes to clashes, not only in college football but in all of sport. The gravity of this matchup was born not only from bad-blood and classic contests, from giants on the sideline and heroes earning accolades on the field, but even moreso for what the win or loss meant each team. The finality of it all has played as large of a role in the ascension of the rivalry as any other factor I've seen mentioned since this whole mess of moving the game was brought up.
The Crowd in 1969 via bentley.umich.edu
The importance of Michigan vs Ohio State has been forged from more than just the bad-blood that exists between the two schools, or the characters and giants that have contributed to its lore from between the hashmarks or on the sidelines over the years, or even still from the classic contests that we still watch today decades after they were played. No, you see part of what has made THE GAME worthy of all-caps, bold, and italics is that it has carried a weight and meaning that is quite frankly, hard to fathom. You see in the 75 years since the Michigan Ohio State game was moved to the final week of the conference season (done in 1935) the game has literally been the Big 10 Championship game 22 times, or just under 30%. Impressive in and of itself, but then you consider the impact that it has had on the Big 10 title...another 24 times the outcome has had a role in determining the Big 10 championship. So, 46 times in 75 years, this ONE GAME at the end of the year has either determined outrightly or played a significant role in determining the conference title... that's 61.3%. Big Two and little eight (nine) indeed. Want the full rundown on each of these contests and how they affected the conference outcome? Sure you do, look no further than the awesome Bentley Historical Library site.
Pretty ridiculous when you ponder those numbers for a bit. Now then, let's ponder whether there would even be such a compilation of these kinds of numbers if these two teams met annually in October rather than wrapping up the season at the end of the year. Ill-informed state that there's no difference, playing the game is playing the game. They're wrong. Playing the game knowing exactly what is at stake and what spoils go to the Victor and sorrows to the loser is entirely different. Are Tai Streets and Shawn Springs inexorably linked if the slip and subsequent home run slant occurred in October rather than in November with an 11-0 team staring a Big 10 title and National Title in the face? You tell me.
Timing matters, it matters a lot, and it especially matters in the meaning of this rivalry. Take the Michigan Daily headline following the 1995 contest: "Biakabutuka's 313 yards ruin Ohio State's title hopes"... move it forward a month and it becomes "Biakabutuka's 313 yards ruin Ohio State's day"... blah. You don't get Keith Jackson's all-time call of "Helloooo Heisman!!!". What's more relevant to college football, Michigan and Ohio State playing a great game in early Fall, or Michigan and Ohio State playing a game that will decide whether one team plays for a title (conference or otherwise) or not. What next guys, we start playing at a neutral site? Blasphemy.
We have plenty of other grudge-matches and key games to play around with, see the ND night game coming next year, there needs to be some appreciation for the fact that what seperates Michigan/Ohio State from Michigan/MSU, Michigan/ND, etc is not just the intensity of the malevolence between the two camps, but what a win means. It's not just bragging rights, it's a successful season with titles on the line vs being remembered as a coach who got teams to 11-0 and then couldn't get by Michigan.
Think of how Woodson clinched the Heisman. Think of how Desmond clinched the Heisman. Think of all of those defining moments, Streets and Springs, Touchdown Tim, hell if it helps think of Archie Griffin. The combination of the opponent, the stage, and what was on the line in those games combined to elevate those players and performances above and beyond just "great" and go to "career defining" and that is why THE GAME deserves to remain in its rightful place at the end of the year. While an actual championship game will take place afterwards, steps can be taken to ensure that Michigan and Ohio State continues to have the opportunity to influence the course of the conference title: keep the teams in the same division, and continue to play the game in the last weekend of the season. The weight and importance is kept, and you have the added bonus of avoiding the chincy-ness of a possible rematch a week or two later. It's not a difficult solution, and my view, it's the right thing to do.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Could not agree more.
The Game’s importance is just as much wrapped up in the “when” as it is in the “who”.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
Meeechigan
and Ohio State belongs on the final weekend of the regular season, period, end of discussion….Go Blue!
by HonoluluBlueJohn1978 on Aug 24, 2010 1:17 PM CDT reply actions
half &half
so then a straight east -west split is what you are calling for????
Not sure how you go from...
“Michigan and Ohio State need to be in the same division” to thinking I’m calling for a straight East-West split….
GO BLUE! http://www.maizenbrew.com/
Clicked early...
Anyways, continuing on. The simple answer is that I don’t have a good answer on the divisions.
I’m split, I think that you could achieve a decent setup in two ways, one is to set up your divisions thusly (one that will please Penn State fans geographically speaking):
A: Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Indiana, Purdue, and Northwestern
B: Michigan State, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, Iowa
Or competitively, and one that is more compelling if you ask me, is to do it like this:
A: Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State, Indiana, Purdue, Illinois
B: Penn State, Northwestern, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Nebraska
I think the concerns over setting this up “geographically” are mostly overblown, and the second setup more evenly distributes the power in the conference. But who knows, there’s a number of proposals out there and the simple fact is that however it ends up won’t please everyone. I think one of the vital components is to keep the Michigan OSU game at the end of the year, and to keep the importance of it, and the easiest way to do that is to keep the two teams in the same division (imo).
GO BLUE! http://www.maizenbrew.com/
Agree
I do like UM & OSU together. Both examples have good and bad points. Geographically seems the only right way with possible more balance, Competitively is an unknown from year to year. A, would have one ranked team pre season and B, would have 4. Is it possible that geographical could also be most competitive?
This is madness
They have to be in the same division, period.
We’re talking about having a possible upset every year they aren’t playing for the division, versus playing for nothing and occasionally meeting up in the postseason.
It’s like moving the Red Sox to the National League so they can play the Yankees in the World Series. Lunacy.
Can't work that way...
Setting aside the notion that THE GAME hasn’t been nearly as relevant since Senator Tressel showed up and Michigan forgot this wasn’t flag football…
There is NO good solution – every option has major downsides.
- Same division, earlier game? Won’t happen – no point in moving it earlier if there’s no possibility of a rematch.
- Same division, last week of the regular season? Then the two teams will never meet to decide the Big Ten Champion – all too realistic for the winner of The Game to lose the Big Ten championship. Moreover, what if both OSU and Michigan are undefeated heading into The Game, while the other division is looking at sending 9-3 Wisconsin or Iowa to face the winner? 11-1 Michigan or Ohio State is sitting at home watching – doesn’t make much sense…
- Different divisions, last week? Won’t happen – a rematch 7 days later is absurd. We can all safely assume this one isn’t even on the table.
- Different divisions, earlier matchup? By meeting earlier in the season, it conversely makes it possible to meet in the last game – the championship. And THIS is what we all want, isn’t it? The LAST game, not “the last-pre-championship-game-that-kinda-sorta-matters”. One team undefeated, the other with (at least) one loss and looking for revenge in a major way by spoiling the other’s undefeated season. Whether you’re Michigan or Ohio State, that’s a great ending.
Face it – the 2006 11-0/11-0 matchup was a fluke – how often have both teams been undefeated at that last game? It was great that we had it, everyone can say “remember when?”. Now let’s take the next step. We want the Big Ten to be dominant, right? Make this our decade and put the SEC in their place, right? Let’s do the smart thing and not screw it up.
You said it yourself that the 2006 matchup was a fluke therefore your argument against the same division, last week holds no water. Keep the rivalry the same and deal with the championship game after that. Oklahoma and Texas still manage a good rivalry in the same division, but look what happened to the Nebraska/Oklahoma game.
There IS a good solution…keep it the same.
by dcmaizeandblue on Aug 25, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
THE BIG GAME
As a loyal Buckeye, gotta say: what a great article! You hit every point and hit it well (unlike those UM place kickers back in the 70’s!). This article shows what a true winner is (unlike John Cooper and his pathetic coaching) and gives me hope we will retain THE BIG GAME for a long time to come. Makes me proud to be involved in the greatest rivalry in sports!
Go Big Ten!
Go Bucks!

by 





















