They Are Who We Thought They Were: Michigan Hangs on for 42-37 Win Over UMass
It wasn't until Coach Rodriguez took off his headset and started walking out to midfield for a post game handshake that I finally allowed myself to breathe.
After two weeks of Kool Aid drinking and visions of New Years Day bowl games dancing in Michigan Fans' starry eyed heads, a tidal wave of reality came crashing down on the Ann Arbor shores. That's probably too many metaphors for a single sentence, but I don't care. I'm still trying to figure out what the hell I witnessed on Saturday.
After the Notre Dame game I wrote the following:
Saturday's game was simply confirmation of everything we felt about this team heading into 2010. The offense is explosive. The defense is suspect. Games will be won and lost in the final minutes of this season's game more often than is healthy for anyone's cardiovascular health. There will be games where Michigan is forced to outscore a pinball machine for the Wolverines to walk away with a win. There will be games where few things make sense. But we knew this already. Saturday just confirmed it.
A week later, that paragraph can just as easily sum up Michigan's tread bare win over D1-AA UMass as it did the win of Notre Dame. Again, the offense put up Playstation type numbers and 42 points. Again, the defense allowed Playstation type numbers and 37 points. This is not a recipe for a New Years Bowl trip. Frankly, it's a recipe for disaster.
Michigan came out of the gate as sharp as a bowling ball, and instead of knifing through UMass as they should've, Michigan's defense spent most of it's day in the gutter. The linebacker pay was atrocious. Jonas Mouton and Obi Ezeh basically pole vaulted backwards in their development, Jordan Kovacs likewise spent a good chunk of his day out of position and the defensive line failed put any pressure on UMass quarterback. It was ugly.
And it's not the the offense was particularly good early on either. On Robinson's first pass, he woefully under threw Roy Roundtree and a sure touchdown had he put more air under the ball. After a "that's more like it" 93 yard touchdown drive, the offense dropped a three and out allowing UMass to roll up a 17-7 lead on the Wolverines.
Sure, things eventually worked out. Michigan scored touchdowns on 6 of its 10 relevant possessions. But UMass also scored on 6 of 10 possessions, with the difference being a field goal rather than a touchdown saved Michigan's bacon.
The bottom line remains that Michigan is going to struggle against teams with large Offensive Lines (UMass offensive line averages just under 6-5 305 pounds. Their LT Nick Speller6-5 335 is a transfer from Syracuse and was on the All-Big East Freshman team last year.) and strong running games. Michigan simply doesn't have the numbers at linebacker or on the Defensive Line to stand up to that consistently. And the total inability to stop the run opened up the secondary, as Robinson was forced to drop the safeties lower to help out in the run game. The numbers are exceeding frustrating to look at. UMass ran the ball 49 times for 217 yards. That led to UMass being able to throw the ball 29 times, and complete 22 of those passes.
The bottom line is Michigan fans need to scale back their expectations for this year. As much as we like to say last season chastened us, everyone got caught up in the Denardification of the offense. We all started talking about the potential for an even better season than we first predicted. Nine wins were a legitimate possibility. After Saturday's performance, I'm sticking with my original predictions. This is a seven or eight win team. Maybe this was a defensive fluke. Maybe the team will improve.
But to borrow from Denny Green, "They are who we thought they were." This is an exciting, dynamic offense led by the most electrifying Michigan quarterback any of us have ever seen. It's also a undermanned, inconsistent defense with all the depth of a kiddie pool.
And we're going to see a lot more shootouts just like this.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wish the defense would just put up XBOX like numbers. At least people on 360 can actually play defense.
by formerlyanonymous on Sep 20, 2010 10:11 AM CDT reply actions
Besides about 5 or 6 BLATANT holds not called on UMass and the events that took place in the final 6 minutes (Gordons INT/Fumble combo and the miffed punt snap) I thought our extremely young D did about what I expected. I think if Gordon doesn’t fumble we may score one more time.
What was perplexing to me was not stacking the box and trying to run the clock out in the I formation.
by Pinchy The Lobster on Sep 20, 2010 10:23 AM CDT reply actions
missed a doozy
Had a chance to buy tix to the game but declined because I convinced myself it would be a blowout. Why spend $150 and most of my day watching a curb stomp of a I-AA team when I could catch the highlights after playing 18 holes? Boy was I shocked to get the telephone call from my hater bro-in-law (OSU fan) gloating that UM would be lucky to pull it out. I ran to the clubhouse to watch the final minutes in agony thinking it was my laissez-faire attitude that had done in the men in blue. Truly thank God for Mike Martin – otherwise I might have thrown myself in the lake that swallowed 4 of my balls attempting my own Tin-Cup moment!
by boliver46 on Sep 20, 2010 10:24 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Why do we play 1-AA schools?
I don’t understand this. Is there a lack of 1-A teams willing to get a paycheck from attending the Big House?
These ranked 1-AA teams (App State, UMass, tons of examples across the country last weekend) are as good or better than the bad 1A teams, yet there’s much more of a stigma for a loss and less credit for a win. I mean, if we replaced UMass with EMU or Ohio, I think we win bigger and can still say ‘at least we play Division 1 teams’. We lose (god forbid but I watched the defense Saturday…), at least it was to a 1-A team. It still stings (see: Toledo) but I’d rather have that than a loss to someone like UMass or App State, even if they are better teams, because we get crucified in the media for losing to a 1-AA squad.
Is this just a remaining part of the horror that was Bill Martin’s ability to schedule teams that have no name brand that also happen to be having seasons that are dramatically better most in their history? (Utah, App State again, UMass beating two top 25 1AA teams before our game and coming in ranked 15 but it really doesn’t matter because they’re 1-AA, etc.?)
I never, ever, ever want to play a 1-AA and I hope DB recognizes this. Is there an element to this that I am missing? If there is and for some reason we HAVE to schedule a 1-AA opponent to get a home game, then can we at least pick a crappy one like Delaware State every time? It’s either that or our defense improve and right now I have more faith in scheduling crappier non-conf gimmes than our defense improving after the past three years.
I’d also take sweet games like UM-Bama at Jerryworld over 1-AA teams but I think I’m dreaming too much to expect playing brand-name teams on a regular basis in addition to ND during non-con…
by Good Ol' Oakley on Sep 20, 2010 11:31 AM CDT reply actions
One of the reasons that we’ve been playing so many I-AA programs is that more mid-level programs are scheduling I-AA programs themselves to puff up their win/loss record. From a MAC,Sun Belt, C-USA perspective, they’re less willing to schedule three or four lucrative, but almost certain defeats to BCS teams when they can play one or two I-AA games themselves to get closer to bowl eligibility.
Would 49 - 37 made you feel better ???
Probably not a whole lot – but there is no doubt in my mind that RR put the playbook away at the 6 minute mark of the 4th quarter. Was the I-formation going to run the clock out ? If anyone still believes this team can move the football the length of the field in the I-formation … they must have been in a coma since 2007.
UMass put 8 in the box as soon as they saw the I-formation .. which a simple bootleg may have gone for 20 or more, but no we “power run” the football with the smallest quickest back we have.
I as stood there watchig this all unfold in front of my eyes – it was the worst feeling I have had at the BH since Oregon in 2007. Worse than App. State …
So what exactly is greg robinson trying to accomplish?
It would be nice to have an idea of the defensive plan. I found myself missing ron english.
Don't go there. ;)
English was awful. Look at Eastern. They haven’t improved one his under his “tutelege”.
The defensive plan is, to me, pretty evident. Stand the line up and let the linebackers flow to the gaps. The issue is the linebackers aren’t playing well. Actually, they’re playing horribly. And that’s the issue.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Sep 21, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Denny Green Lives!
I can see him smashing his fist in to the podium. Great article. There’s just not enough players on the defensive side of the ball. UM can still win 8. Go Blue!

by 






![[Ed Note - I was praying someone would post this. My thanks and a massive massive hat tip to Canzior for posting this for us. Beyond awesome!]
Brock Mealer and the team coming out of the Tunnel](http://cdn0.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/142732/2_small.jpg)















