Getting to Know Michigan Football's New Defensive Coordinator, Greg Mattison (Defensive Rankings and All)
For the first time in a long time, since 2006 really, Michigan appears to finally have the right man at the defensive helm. When Brady Hoke was hired last week there were more questions than answers on the defensive side of the ball. What base defense would we play? Will players transfer? Can we recruit enough guys to fill the holes? And, most importantly, who in the hell is going to be our Defensive Coordinator.
Two years after the most ridiculous and ill-fated hire in Michigan football history (GERG!), Michigan went big and hired someone not just out of the NFL, but the Defensive Coordinator for one of the most dominant defenses in the professional ranks. On top of that, the hire was a man with Michigan bloodlines, stout recruiting chops, and a track record for stellar defensive play. In short, at first glance Michigan connected on a 70 yard bomb for the game winning touchdown with no time remaining. Hire wise, that is.
The man of the hour is former Baltimore Ravens' defensive coordinator Greg Mattison. Mattison's credentials are as impressive as you can find in the game of football, college or pro. In an effort to get to know him better, I took a look at Mattison's track record and put the important (available) numbers down for everyone to look at. Mattison's been a defensive line coach and defensive coordinator in some capacity his entire career. He's worked under Jack Harbaugh at Western Michigan, Lloyd Carr at Michigan, Urban Meyer at Florida, and Rex Ryan in the pros.
Because his resume as a coach basically goes back to the Paleolithic Era, I decided to limit my research to Mattison's college work since he first became a defensive coordinator in 1995 at Michigan. His time as a Defensive Coordinator (with a three year stint as DL and recruiting coordinator at Notre Dame) spans 13 years and is as impressive as it comes. I kept track of the rankings (and actual numbers supporting the rankings) for Total Defense, Rush Defense, Pass Defense, and Scoring Defense. Mattison's career defensive rankings from 1995-2007 are posted below for your review. Look at them and smile.
Brian at MGo already has a Cliff's Notes version of this, but here are some highlights based on the numbers I gathered. He's been a part of top 20 defenses in 6 of his 13 years as a college coordinator. As a defensive line coach, your best measure of performance is in the running game. The worst rushing defense he's ever fielded (in his first year at Notre Dame, BTW) was ranked 83rd. Other than that, each rush defense he's fielded has been 57th or better. In fact, even in the last year of the Willingham debacle at Notre Dame, Mattison's run defense was ranked 4th(!!!!) in the country. After three years of watching Michigan get run on like a treadmill, even Mattison's worst year would be an improvement.
This isn't to say that Mattison's track record is perfect. There are the outliers like the Notre Dame's historically bad 2004 pass defense (116th) and his flamable 97th ranked 2007 Florida pass defense which Michigan set abalze in the 2008 Citrus Bowl. But, as always, There are explanations. Mattison was relieved of his DC duties by Willingham in 2002 and served only as DL coach. The result was a precipitous drop in Notre Dame's pass defense rankings and culminated in Willingham's final, horid 116th ranked pass defense. Mattison, as noted above, fielded arguably one of Notre Dame's Mattison's best run defenses in spite of Willingham's incompetence.
As for the 2007 Florida defense, when you're starting mostly freshman and sophomores bad things happen. As a Michigan fan you should be aware of this. But that same defense won the national championship the next year, so apparently Mattison recruited good players and coached them up to the point that they were world beaters the next year.
It's pretty staggering to look at the drop in production of Notre Dame's pass defense after Mattison's demotion. After cratering in 1999 as the 82nd ranked pass defense, Mattison improved the pass defense to 43rd and then 10th in the next two years. After Willingham took over, the pass defense dropped to 46, 48, and 116. Hello cliff. What's staggering to me is that Mattison's defense limited Notre Dame's opponents to just 19.5 points a game in 2001, and Davie still managed to get himself fired.
Mattison can coach defense, yo. The numbers below prove it.
A key thing to keep in mind with this hire is Mattison's recruiting talents. Usually I avoid quoting anywhere from former Notre Dame HC Bob Davie for fear that his slllloooooowwwww ddddrrrrraaaaawwwwwwlllll will infect me and make me repeatedly overstate the obvious, but in this video he says one of the most important things Michigan fans need to hearright now: Greg Mattison can recruit. For all of Bob davie's faults as a football coach, recruiting was not one of them. That's high praise. If there's anything Michigan has desperately needed over the last four to five years it's a closer as our main defensive recruiter. While Michigan has brought some top level talent to Ann Arbor, sadly, it hasn't brought enough of it. Mattison's experience, personality, and NFL connections should change that.
Moving forward toward the 2011 season, Mattison is going to have his hands full. Michigan is short on experience and depth at the linebacker position, as well as short on depth on the defensive line. Michigan's returning a pile of players in the secondary, including injured starters Troy Woolfolk and J.T. Floyd, but not a lot of experience... er... no... that's not right... proven goodperformance. Critically, the Wolverines have been one of the worst tackling and least fundamentally sound teams in the Big Ten and it's going to be Mattison's to fix that. But Mattison's track record certainly indicates he can. When Mattison's been in charge, he's fielded top 20 defenses 5 times in 8 years.
Given Michigan's goofy (re: bad) coaching over the last three years and the personnel issues Mattison is going to face, I'm not entirely sure what kind of defense he's going to run. Logic points to the 3-4 that TuffLynx described a few days ago. It's an NFL standard; Michigan's played with 3 down linement most of the last three years; lack of depth at the line; etc., etc., etc. But it's not like Michigan has the linebacker depth to employ a 3-4. If Michigan was to run a 3-4 (at least to me) you'd basically be running the 3-3-5 bandit/spur/whatever all over again because you'd be dropping Roh back to LB and moving him up and back. And we know that doesn't work.
My guess is that Michigan will run a 4-3 next season and probably the 2012 season until its linebacker depth recovers. In a 4-3 you can deploy Richard Ash and Mike Martin on the inside (with back-up from Terry Talbott and Quinton Washinton [and maybe Will Campbell]), and Ryan Van Bergen and Craig Roh on the outside with Jibreel Black spotting them (I'm sure we'll have at least two more DE's helping out, but I'm a little tired/lazy right now, so I'll let you fill that in on your own). That's the start of a decent line, though not one with a lot of depth. At Linebacker we're staring at Kenny Demens and J.D. Fitzgerald and a lot of unknowns. Clearly, Mattison's biggiest development challenge will be finding a servicable third linebacker and developing some depth. But that's a lot better than running a variant of the 3-3-5 (by necessity) all over again.
Michigan made a great move in hiring Mattison. If you're not sold yet, take a look at the numbers below and get back to me. We're in good shape. Mattison will hopefully be the catalyst that helps bring Michigan's defense back from the dead and starts to bring back that wonderful feeling we all remember. You know. The one that makes you feel like our defense can not only stop these guys, but own them.
For the first time in years, I feel like we might be able to get that back. And that's a great feeling.
The Greg Mattison College Defensive Coordinator (and Defensive Line Coach) Rankings File
1995-1996 Michigan (DC)
1995:
Total Defense = 11th -- 286.3 ypg allowed
Scoring Defense = 13th -- 16.8 ppg allowed
Rush Defense = 3rd-- 419 att * 1081 yards * 2.6 ypc * 90.1 ypg
Pass Defense = 29th(Pass efficiency defense) -- 106.48 ypg * 15 INT * 9 TD * 394att/222comp
1996:
Total Defense = 18th-- 300.9 ypg allowed
Scoring Defense = 8th -- 15.2 ppg allowed
Rush Defense = 17th-- 420 att * 1193 yards * 2.8 ypc * 108.5 ypg
Pass Defense = 20th(Pass efficiency defense) -- 100.63 ypg * 13 INT * 5 TD * 371att/205comp
1997-2004 Notre Dame (DC until 2001, 2002-2004 DL coach recruiting coordinator)
1997: (7-6 Davie)
Total Defense = 60th-- 365.1 ypg allowed
Scoring Defense = 31st -- 19.8 ppg allowed
Rush Defense = 83rd-- 494 att * 2217 yards * 4.5 ypc * 184.8 ypg
Pass Defense = 23rd (Pass efficiency defense) -- 180ypg * 14 INT * 5 TD * 338att/184comp
1998: (9-3)
Total Defense = 43rd -- 347.2 ypg allowed
Scoring Defense = 27th-- 19.4 ppg allowed
Rush Defense = 40th-- 445 att * 1560yards * 3.5 ypc * 141.8 ypg
Pass Defense = 53rd(Pass efficiency defense) -- 119.71ypg * 12INT * 11 TD * 330att/193comp
1999: (5-7)
Total Defense = 74th-- 383.7 ypg allowed
Scoring Defense = 78th-- 27.6 ppg allowed
Rushing Defense = 50th-- 428att * 1706 yards * N/A ypc * 142.2 ypg
Pass Defense = 82nd(Pass efficiency defense) -- 241.5 ypg * 12 INT * 21 TD * 407att/236comp
[Ed Note - slight change in presentation, Scoring defense is now listed last. Formatting issue.]
2000: (9-3)
Total Defense = 51st-- 353.82 ypg allowed
Rushing Defense = 57th-- 439att * 1624yards * 3.7 ypc * 147.6 ypg
Pass Defense(PED no longer charted) = 43rd-- 206.18ypg * 13 INT * 15 TD * 310att/156comp
Scoring Defense = 35th -- 20.5ppg allowed
2001: (5-6 Davie fired at end of season)
Total Defense= 14th-- 304.91 ypg allowed
Rush Defense= 39th-- 416 att * 1455 yards * 3.50 ypc * 132.3 ypg
Pass Defense= 10th-- 172.64 ypg * 14 INT * 13 TD * 274att/137 comp
Scoring Defense = 22nd-- 19.5 ppg allowed
2002: (10-3 Willingham, Mattison DL Coach and Recruiting Coordinator)
Total Defense = 13th-- 300 ypg allowed
Rush Defense= 10th-- 439 att * 1238 yards * 2.82 ypc * 95.2 ypg
Pass Defense= 46th -- 204.77 ypg * 21 INT * 12 TD* 452att/223comp
Scoring Defense = 9th-- 16.7 ppg allowed
2003: (5-7, Mattison DL Coach and Recruiting Coordinator)
Total Defense= 33rd-- 340.17 ypg allowed
Rush Defense = 29th -- 486 att * 1526yards * 3.14 ypc * 127.2ypg
Pass Defense= 48th-- 213.00 ypg * 13 INT * 16 TD * 337att/194comp
Scoring Defense = 65th-- 25.3 ppg allowed
2004: (6-6, Mattison DL Coach and Recruiting Coordinator, Willingham and Mattison fired at end of season)
Total Defense= 54th-- 369.42 ypg allowed
Rush Defense = 4th-- 399att * 1058 yards * 2.65 ypc * 88.2 ypg
Pass Defense= 116th-- 281.25 ypg * 9INT * 23TD * 426att/248comp
Scoring Defense = 46th-- 24.1 ppg allowed
2005-2007 Florida (Co-DC, DL coach)
2005: (HC Urban Meyer)
Total Defense = 9th-- 299.83 ypg allowed
Rush Defense= 10th-- 373 att * 1139 yards * 3.05 ypc * 94.9 ypg
Pass Defense= 38th-- 204.92 ypg *16 INT *16 TD * 375att/196comp
Scoring Defense = 18th-- 18.8 ppg allowed
2006: (National Championship)
Total Defense= 6th-- 255.43 ypg allowed
Rush Defense= 5th-- 370 att * 1015 yards * 2.74 ypc * 72.5 ypg
Pass Defense = 33rd-- 182.93ypg * 21 INT * 10 TD * 458 244comp
Scoring Defense = 6th-- 13.5 ppg allowed
2007:
Total Defense = 41st-- 361.85 ypg allowed
Rush Defense= 10th-- 442 att * 1343 yards * 3.04 ypc * 103.3ypg
Pass Defense = 98th-- 258.54 ypg *11INT * 19TD * 466att/277comp
Scoring Defense = 43th -- 25.5 ppg allowed
2008-2010 Ravens (DL Coach 2008, 2009-2010 DC)
11 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's sort of a Big Ten Law: You can't win championships without good defense.
It doesn’t have to be great, but it always has to be good.
I wrote this piece around this time last year to show how defense is what really matters. There is a reason why Penn State and Ohio State have been dominating the Big Ten the last several years. It’s not because of Troy Smith, Daryl Clark and Terrelle Pryor. Those two teams have dominated the league in scoring defense and rushing defense.
2010 was interesting and unique, though, because Ohio State had the best scoring and rushing defense in the league. Wisconsin was 5th in the league in rushing defense and 4th in scoring defense. Wisconsin won the Roses, but Ohio State won a share of the Big Ten title with (UW, MSU).
Michigan might very well improve considerably on defense in 2011. I mean, how could they not? Woolfolk, JT Floyd are likely returning in the secondary, plus a bunch of talented RS freshman players coming onto the scene. The only iffy section might be LB (again). The DL front 4, if healthy, should be pretty darn good.
With a more brute-force, physical style on defense, the byproduct may be more injuries. Michigan still does not have the depth it needs along the DL and LB next year.
Mattison is going do well as DC at Michigan. 2011 is going to be a year of growing pains for sure. It will take a couple years, but as early as 2012 Michigan might be a very good football team again in the Big Ten and on the national scene.
Go Blue!
We also need to remember...
That the awesome and dominant defense of the 1997 Wolverines was mainly recruited and coached up by Mattison. He might have been at Notre Dame when his kids dominated everyone they played and won a national championship. But I bet you anything that he was still proud of them.
I would also like to clarify that my 3-4 article was entirely about a “what if” scenario. Mattison is perfectly capable of coaching a 4-3 and has done so in many seasons. I was just intrigued with the idea that Mattison might convert Michigan to the 3-4 at some point and Michigan will be on the leading edge of what appears to be the next hot thing in college football. Clearly the Wolverines are personnel challenged on defense not matter what formation they play. But the 4-3 alignment makes a lot of sense initially, until Mattison can get to work and recruit some guys.
Totally agree
The reference was more to your initial points that Mattison has run a 3-4, the NFL loves 3-4 players, and that the defense has played a similar style over the last three years. Sorry if it came off otherwise.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Jan 21, 2011 8:58 AM CST up reply actions
I'd love to see a fanpost about the development of Michigan's D in 2010
It was the single biggest concern coming into the season. And yet, despite sub-par leadership from the DC (GERG!), I actually thought Michigan’s D showed promise.
Obviously there was a lot of inconsistencies and growing pains. And lots of mistakes made. (And lets not even talk about the gator bowl).
But on a pure what can we expect moving forward level, with such an exciting DC, where are we at?
I'm feeling hopeful
as Daisy would say …“thats better”
it's not that you are stupid, it's just that you don't suspect!
Nothing is good nor bad until compared to something else.
Great post Dave.
Very well done.
Mattison knows how to stop the run, obviously. The only thing that scares me is that this linebacking crew doesn’t. It will take a year or two before we see big results, but it will get better steadily. There’s nowhere to go but up…..
I love this signing.
My 6-year old daughter even hates the Ravens.
by SundaysWithTroy on Jan 21, 2011 2:03 PM CST reply actions
I'm less worried about the returning linebackers than I am about their depth
Kenny Demens proved to be a pretty good linebacker this season and I’m hopeful that J.B. Fitzgerald should be able to make a leap without GERG rubbing furry animals on him. The issue is for me is who the hell is going to be the other LB? Further, where’s the depth!? I’m hopeful that redshirt Josh Furman can play OLB next year and that Jake Ryan will be ready to play and back up at MLB, but we’re still short at that position barring some 5* ready to play LB joining the 2011 class.
But considering just how back Mouton and Ezeh have been for the last three years, I think we’ll see improvement by subtraction.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Jan 21, 2011 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
Let me try that last sentence again...
But considering just how BAD Mouton and Ezeh have been for the last three years, I think we’ll see improvement by subtraction.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Jan 21, 2011 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
I'm with you on that.
My 6-year old daughter even hates the Ravens.
by SundaysWithTroy on Jan 21, 2011 3:56 PM CST up reply actions
Anyone else think
He kinda looks like Beckman?

by 



















