What Happened to Rich Rodriguez Pt. 3
Disclaimer Portion of FUN
This is the final installment of the story of Rich Rodriguez at Michigan. The conversation surrounding Rodriguez has recently become something of a mud fight with nobody winning because reality has forced us to move on. The recent discussion has gotten so contentious that I thought about not completing this series - as surface level as it is - because frankly that discussion is beating a dead pterodactyl. Supporting, skeptical, awesome recruiting class, Rodriguez could have gotten Dee Hart: all those arguments are not addressed here. It is meant to be a surface level look at Rodriguez's tenure, and the various pressures that eventually led to his dismissal. Part one is here, part two is here, and on with the show.
Wait, first here's another quick note. Throughout this series, I've referred to the "casual fan." What I mean by this is the non-internet dwelling, non-Rivals subscription holding fan. Like it or not, and I know that many around the internet are fighting this every day, people who love Michigan, care about Michigan, give money to Michigan, buy apparel from Michigan - they all have a voice as well. My guess is that those fans outnumber those who follow every story in all outlets. These are good people who only get their sports news from ESPN occasionally and the local papers. This is the constituency, if such a word can be used, that was most hurt by the outlandish media treatment of the various issues facing Rodriguez because they never went deeper into the issue, and it doesn't matter how much this blog, or mgoblog, or Adam Rittenberg screamed on the internet. My dad is an example. Yours might be too.
Season 3
Rodriguez entered his third season at the helm with still more questions than he had answers. Tate Forcier, the previous season's starting quarterback, had been stripped of his wings in a motivational tactic, and was publicly called out by Troy Woolfolk for not being prepared to play football. Nearly immediately after, Woolfolk - heralded as nearly the only serviceable member of the Michigan secondary had his ankle explode spectacularly while running a non-contact drill. If you're counting, that means that Michigan entered the 2010 season with their starting quarterback in obvious turmoil, and the only player standing between a real secondary and doom in the hospital and out for the season. If you want to throw in the fact that Brandon Minor and Brandon Graham had graduated, feel free. Eerily similar to Rodriguez's first season, we had no idea what to expect from the Wolverines as they entered the season.
What we did know was that Michigan was going to get a good test right out of the gate. Uconn, Notre Dame, Umass, and Bowling Green were up first, then on to the Big Ten season that had tortured Rodriguez over the past two seasons. Most expected Michigan to drop one, or both, of the opening games, as Uconn was the darkhorse pick to win the Big East, and there was no way we were getting lucky again against Notre Dame. What happened was unbelievable even to the most unshakable Rodriguez supporters. Denard Robinson came out and blistered Uconn, and repeated his performance against Notre Dame. Everyone was on this strange-in-hindsight Denard Robinson high (like Meth, but you keep your teeth) four games into the season. He was leading Heisman ballots, and doing things that literally had never been done before in NCAA football. Rodriguez had found his quarterback, and everything was going to be all right.
However, while we were all celebrating our new offensive howitzer, the defense loomed ominously. They looked ok against Notre Dame's third-string QB, but barely squeaked by Umass - an FCS team. Perhaps more ominous was the pounding that Denard took during those first four games. He missed the majority of the BGSU game, and got dinged in every other game. When the Big Ten season opener started against Indiana, Michigan was ranked in the top-20, and fueled by dilithium, but everyone paying attention knew that there were some serious flaws. Indiana proceeded to shred our defense, with Michigan managing to hold serve until the end. The offense was explosive, the defense was among the worst in the NCAA.
However, the tide had definitely turned for Rodriguez. His offense was everything that WVU in their prime was, and his team was 5-0 headed into the Rivalry game with Michigan State. Even those mouth-breathers who claimed that Rodriguez didn't "get it" were pretty quiet. Predictions for the team quietly crept up into the 9-10 win realm. Then reality struck. Over the remaining conference games, it became clear that the defense - as undermanned as it was - was also under coached. There wasn't a single thing that the defense did well. Whether it was moving from 3-4, 4-3, 3-3-5 or having the Middle Linebacker pointlessly line up 3 yards off the nose, it became clear that Greg Robinson was either wholly incompetent, or at least incompetent at running the 3-3-5 that Rodriguez seemed to shove down all his defensive coordinator's clipboards. Even simple things like goal-line defense were not only executed by players thrust in playing time before they were ready, but schematically "knuckle-headed."
The end result was that Michigan got destroyed by every good team they played. The offense was great, but without a field goal kicker or a defense capable of getting them the ball back, their yardage explosions often ended in a 4th and 6 incomplete pass. On November 4th, Rodriguez got something of a reprieve. The NCAA had essentially agreed with Michigan's self-imposed sanctions, and their official report amounted to a fraction of the allegations that the Free Press had, well, alleged. Like everything associated with Michigan Football, the NCAA's findings managed to make the ESPN crawl, and made their rounds across nearly every media channel. Except for blogs, however, there was no attempt (that I can remember) to clearly detail that the NCAA's final findings were slight. What casual fans, and those not associated with the program in the least, got was a nice reminder that Michigan was in trouble for the first time. Educated fans knew better. Casual fans did not.
The season ended with the most uncompetitive game against Ohio State that I have ever seen (I turned it off after the INT/fumble-non-call sequence). However, the final record stood at 7-5 and Michigan was going to a New Years bowl game. Despite the fact that this was considered by many commentators (media or alumni) the minimum requirement to grant Rodriguez a fourth year, the debate raged on whether he should be retained. It was no easy question, primarily because of the glaring deficiencies that his team still displayed, 3 years into his coaching tenure.
The defense, while definitely decimated, was also obviously poorly coached and regressing. The Special Teams play, particularly at kicker, was a laughing stock. Even the 7-5 record, when viewed through the lens of a 5-0 start, was pretty thin. If there was a contest to see how underwhelming a coach could make his "minimum requirement" this was it.
Meanwhile, out in Palo Alto, Michigan Alum Jim Harbaugh was becoming something of a hot commodity. His Cardinal were on their way to play in the Orange Bowl after another stellar season. His coaching resume actually read "Made Pete Carroll ask me what my deal was after kicking his face in repeatedly." Most importantly, it seemed that Harbaugh was ready for the next challenge. Even staunch supporters of Rodriguez were facing the possibility of his dismissal. Mgoblog's self-proclaimed "last to die on Rodriguez hill" Brian Cook:
If Rodriguez is broomed and Harbaugh installed here my reaction will be "meh" quickly followed by "what about Denard?"
Rodriguez should get broomed and Harbaugh should be installed here, but if that doesn't happen my reaction will largely be "meh."
This caused a swell of media attention towards the program, with most proclaiming that if Harbaugh was available, Rodriguez should be fired. The tide had turned against Rodriguez one final time, and Michigan was throttled by Mississippi State in their bowl game. Rodriguez was dismissed shortly thereafter. The story after that has been dissected to the point of nausea.
So what happened to Rich Rodriguez?
[B2 - subjective portion here, if not obvious]
To use a baseball metaphor, Rodriguez came up to bat with two strikes already called on him. The messy divorce from WVU, the minor player academics scandal, and the major "Michigan Stretches Too Damn Much" scandal turned the environment hostile before he even had a chance to prove himself on the field. Compounding this was the previous coaching staff's seeming reluctance to support him beyond a tacit "I support Michigan Football." If you're reading this blog, then you're three steps ahead of some fans, and the national perception of Rodriguez. It certainly wasn't all bad, but the overwhelming perception of Rodriguez was negative from the national media. Worse, most fans probably didn't get the full story reported by numerous blogs - taking what the local papers and West Virginia media said as truth. How much of it was Rodriguez's own making? Some, certainly. It could have been handled better. Did he deserve the vitriol he got just for changing jobs? No.
Throughout all of this, however, he could have won. He could have ultimately been successful if he had just won some of those games. He survived the NCAA allegations and two consecutive losing seasons, but couldn't ultimately survive the fact that his defense and special teams - no matter how decimated - were not only sub-par, they were sub-Mariana trench-par. I would contend, however, that his on-the-field performance alone was not enough reason to fire him. Michigan knew what they were getting into with that transition. He had met the minimum requirements, and with some defensive overhauling would have probably tipped the scales towards winning significantly in 2011.
It's foolish to say that Rodriguez never had a chance. But with his job was hanging by a thread, the overall negativity surrounding his tenure had become too much for the program to bear. Dave Brandon had to do what he did to give Michigan a break from the negative pressure exerted from the media, the fanbase, and the internal stakeholders who never supported the hire to begin with. There comes a point where no matter how the on-the-field product looks, you have to throw the baby out with the bathwater because that bathwater had turned so toxic that it was poisoning the program.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well done.
I’ve enjoyed your Rodriguez retrospective, and you have done as good a job as any of acknowledging all sides and not succumbing to the simplistic “not a good fit” or “never given a chance” arguments. This series has been a pleasure to read.
Go Blue!
http://www.maizenbrew.com/
I don't care about messy divorces, not "being a Michigan Man" or
“stretching too much”.
All new coaches face attrition, getting in the “right players to run the system”, etc.
That’s not something exclusive to Rodriguez. Also, injuries are just part of the game that affect all teams, not just Michigan. It’s unfortunate, but I found myself using that excuse too many times to defend Rich Rodriguez.
The main reason Rodriguez is not coaching at Michigan anymore was because he failed to install a competent defensive coordinator to lead his defensive assistant coaching staff. The lame depth chart on defense only exacerbated matters, but even then UM fams should have observed significant player improvement in tackling, block-shedding and coverage between 2009 and 2010. The defensive coaches did not do their jobs well.
We can pontificate all we want on how things would be different had WVU DC Jeff Casteel come along to Ann Arbor. I’m sure the outcome would have been very different, but it doesn’t matter. It’s in the past.
Time to move on. Michigan now has crap load of experienced starters back for 2011, an experienced junior at QB, and a proven, competent defensive coordinator at the helm. Ohio State will be the best Big Ten team in 2011, but PSU, Iowa, MSU and Wisconsin all have some work to do to build up their depth charts. For the first time 3 years this will not be the case with Michigan.
It’s not a stretch to say Michigan should be the most improved football team in the Big Ten this year. I’d say the most improved in the MidWest if it weren’t for Notre Dame. I think the Wolverines and Irish will both be surprisingly good teams next fall.
Go Blue!
I agree
For the most part. I am contending that is was a perfect storm of negative press, no institutional support, W-L record, and Harbaugh’s sudden availability that eventually led to the dismissal. Not one of those things happen in a vacuum. It’s just a retrospective – not meant to necessarily say what was right or wrong about the firing.
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."
-H.L. Mencken
http://maizenbrew.com
I AM curious to know where Rich Rodriguez ends up
I’m thinking it will be Tulane, the job Rodriguez originally wanted so badly back in 1999. Current coach Bob Toledo has already scuttled that program. Also I think New Orleans, Louisiana is a place where Rodriguez would feel comfortable and he could bring in the speedy system players he likes very easily. Lastly, Tulane hasn’t featured a defense in college football since 1979, so that too should work out fairly well for RichRod.
Go Blue!
My guess...
…his first choice would be Clemson. He’s still very close with high-level boosters at Clemson and they still fondly recall the offenses he ran there for Bowden. If Dabo bombs out this year, it’s scary how much talent RR could inherit.
Beyond Clemson, Tulane would be a good job where he still has good connections. I think his next job will definitely be in the South.
Yep, Clemson would be a nice fit too
It is amazing how well they’ve done with recruiting the last several years.
Go Blue!
Clemson's roster is loaded
Both on offense and defense. Supposedly, the only thing that kept Dabo from getting fired this year was that top-10 class that he reeled in today. He has to win big next year, or else he’ll lose his job. Clemson always has so much talent, but they underwhelm every year. That would definitely be RR’s dream destination and I think he’d do great there.
I think RR could wait things out for a couple of years, as he has enough money to simply chill for a bit and do some TV work.
by XEO on Mar 2, 2011 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
The RR Appologists Must Love You!!
Let me preface this tyraid by saying I supported RR coming to Michigan. I wanted a wide open O that would make things exciting. I was brought down to earth before half-way through season 1. I hoped he could get things going but it never happened. IT NEVER HAPPENED.
Your piece was very poor on analysis and worse on conclusions. I laugh heartily at the notion RR came to the plate with 2 strikes against him. Balderdash, unless you consider season 1 and season 2 as the strikes against him. The idea that there was a lack of “institutional support” or that it had anything to do with how poor the Wolverines performed under him is as much nonsense as the “Michigan Man” myth. You aren’t going to get former members of the UM squads to support someone who 1) ignores many team traditions, and 2) loses. Not just loses, but loses to less—much less— talented teams; ie 2008 Toledo. And loses severely to nearly the entire Big 10 conference.
The offense had everyone buzzing last fall and the defense was scorned. However, your notion that the bad D contributed to the decline of the O later in the season is downright laughable. I say it was the other way around. The O’s lack of consistancy and innovation made a bad defense even worse. Not sustaining drives, turnovers, etc. all strain an already depleted and poorly coached D to the breaking point. And they broke. The D’s poressness has nothing to do with how potent the O is. The O gets the ball back whether the D stops the opposition, recovers a turnover or the other team scores. And there was absolutely no sign that anything was going to get better.
When was this phony “group hug” (institutional support) supposed to occur? After one of the losses to MSU or OSU? Maybe after the Toledo game? How about after barely beating UMass? There was a victory to hang your hat on! If you are lousy to start with and never get markedly better, what are former players and coaches supposed to say? The program was embarrassing them and they are supposed to say, “Uh, yeah, Coach Rodriguez is my man and I support him all the way.” ? Give me a break!
Where do you think Bo or Mo or Lloyd would be it their first 3 seasons looked like RR’s? And it isn’t just because he lost, though that would be enough, it is how they lost. They simply looked like an FCS school overachieving enough to beat Indiana. Hell, they didn’t look that good. And consider this, what would have happened had he built a winner in the first 2 years. He’d be a God in AA. 3-9 in ‘08 would have been forgiven with a winning ’09 and a good ’10 and we wouldn’t be having this conversation. Even 0-6 against MSU & OSU would be forgiven if there was a sign that the losing streak would be ending soon. In either game, did it look like their was ever “we’ll get ’em next time” moment?
RR was fired because he didn’t do the job he was hired to do. . . win. And do it the right way. The rest of the article is hyperbole put out there, seemingly, to remove responsibilty from RR for the worst era in Michigan football history. Somehow it’s someone elses fault.
by PreachinTotheChoir on Mar 3, 2011 6:24 PM CST reply actions
Preachin it right!
Choir, right on man! The amount of RR apologists/apologizing is nauseating. Your post is awesome and hit the nail right on the head, good job of rebutting.
How many times do we have to read about that loser? Please leave him in the rear view mirror, thankfully his stint in AA is over, the horror is over!!
Markus, I see you’re coming around some in your comments, we all want U-M to kick ass and take names, so welcome from the dark side!! Go Blue!!!
Guarantee
I guarantee that U-M will win at least 10 games this year with a DEF that improves as the season goes on, not worsen. Special teams that will be potentially way more special, and, an O that will improve from 2010 because of experience and scheme.
Hey, SDMick
Thanks for the kind words!! Hope you’re right about the wins!! I like setting the record straight! And I don’t mind reading about or analysis of the RR era especially now that it is history. What I mind is the way things get slanted and taken from proper context into something completely out of context. It’s like somehow if everyone was in love with RR from day one, it would have been “all better.” There wouldn’t have been atrotious play from players and atrocious coaching from the coaches. If the former players and coaches had come to AA and sung “Kum-bi-ya” (not sure how that’s supposed to look, hope you all get it)and “Michael Rowed the Boat Ashore” with RR our D wouldn’t have been in the bottom 10 in the country and the O would have been more consistant and we would have won more. Isn’t that what the apologists would have us believe.
I don’t believe in demonizing a former coach that either didn’t work out or leaves for somewhere else. I don’t thing RR is a lousy coach or poor reader of recruits or of character. I wish him well in finding a new place to ply his chosen craft. He doesn’t need nor deserve to be made out to be the anti-Christ. But it didn’t work and he had to be fired. I think we needed to move on to the chapter of Michigan Football. But that doesn’t mean you block out what has happened the last 3 years, as painful as they have been. Rehashing RR is good for us as long as we know why we talk about it. We shouldn’t rehash it to make villians out of decent people and try to stain reputations. We do it to learn about and gain a new perspective of what we study, and maybe even to lay blame. “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
by PreachinTotheChoir on Mar 4, 2011 2:33 PM CST up reply actions

by 



















