The Big Ten Hockey Conference Will Begin Play in 2013 as Big Ten Hockey Death Star Nears Completion
It's official. The Big Ten Conference will drop the puck when the 2013-2014 NCAA Men's hockey season kicks off. Here's the relevant info from the Big Ten's press release:
The directors of athletics of Big Ten institutions which sponsor men's ice hockey unanimously announce their intention to recommend to the Big Ten Council of Presidents/Chancellors in June the establishment of men's ice hockey as an official conference sport for the 2013-14 academic year with participation by Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Ohio State, Penn State and Wisconsin.The recommendation includes both the establishment of the inaugural Big Ten Men's Ice Hockey Tournament in March of 2014, with the winner earning the conference's automatic bid to the NCAA Men's Ice Hockey Championship, and a 20-game conference schedule with each team playing the other five schools four times (two home games and two away games). In addition, the Big Ten's men's ice hockey programs will continue to proactively work to maintain a strong schedule of non-conference competition with the Central Collegiate Hockey Association (CCHA) and Western Collegiate Hockey Association (WCHA).
As you might have suspected, the ice hockey aspect of the conference will only include men's hockey (as there aren't enough participating women's programs in the conference). The effect of the (inevitable) formation of the Big Ten Hockey Death Star will be felt all over college hockey. As the press release indicates, two charter members of the WCHA and three charter members of the CCHA are departing their respective conferences.
During the 2010 football season, our buddy Windy City Wolverine put together a massive missive explaining Why the Big Ten Hockey Conference was a big deal, What could happen when Penn State actually drops the puck, and gave you his best guess as to what would happen over the next few years to College Hockey. If you go back and re-read these predictions, he's off by a hair. It's frankly scary how close to the mark he was. The only thing that's surprising is that the Conference announced the formation of the league so quickly. I know this wasn't rocket science, but this is what he wrote last September:
With the creation of the BTHC, Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State, Minnesota and Wisconsin leave their current conferences, and all hell breaks looks. A common assumption is that each Big Ten school would play the others four times, meaning that there would be a twenty game conference schedule, along with a conference tournament at a to-be-determined location or locations.
Jackpot.
For Michigan, this is huge news for a number of reasons. First and foremost it looks like it signs the death certificate of the CCHA. Losing three schools, especially Michigan and Michigan State, will be a huge blow to programs like Western Michigan, Northern Michigan, Bowling Green, and Lake State which depend (to some degree) on having the big name universities put butts in seats during the season. The conference is left with Miami and Notre Dame as it's anchors, but still short on viability with just those two.
Second, Michigan is looking at a BRUTAL conference schedule in 2013-2014. Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan State will account for 12 games of their schedule. Nothing like playing a third of your schedule against teams that are usually in the top 10 in college hockey year in year out. Ohio State and Penn State look to be at the bottom of the conference, but the Buckeyes are improving and given the talent base in the North East, you have to think some talented players are going to want to stay at home and build a winner.
Third, moving to a six team league means that there has to be something else afoot. The CCHA and WCHA commissioners can't be thrilled about this, but it sounds like they'll play ball for the time being. Still, at just six teams, you have to think the conference is expecting at least two other schools to elevate their club programs to varsity status. I have no inside info on this, but it makes sense, right?
For the next two seasons, nothing changes. Michigan will continue playing in the CCHA and (hopefully) continue its winning ways. But once the Big Ten Hockey Death Star comes on line, there's no telling what it's affect on college hockey will truly be.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
huge conspiracy theory:
ND might want to join the B10 hockey conference, and since the Big East is getting absurd, they’d probably look kindly at joining the B10 for basketball too, which opens the door for football?
Football might not happen, but you never know…
Go Maize, Blue, and Gray!
Not going to happen
The Big Ten has little reason to add Notre Dame to a Big Ten Hockey Conference. They wouldn’t substantially increase overall revenue and there would be another mouth to feed. The same holds largely true for basketball.
However, the Big Ten still does have an interest in adding Notre Dame for football, where Notre Dame would have a significant positive impact on the conference. Furthermore, as demonstrated with the most recent move for conference expansion, Notre Dame was not sufficiently motivated to join the conference. Therefore, if the Big Ten ever wants to get Notre Dame in the conference for football, it should include basketball and hockey membership as additional reasons to join the Big Ten, rather than invite them for other sports and lose leverage to get them into the Big Ten for football.
by Seth9 on Mar 21, 2011 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
ND is never joining the B10 in football
When Texas inked the deal with ESPN, any small chance ND would ever join the Big Ten in football died a violent death.
For every complex problem, there is an answer that is simple, easy to understand, and wrong.
by MosherJordan on Mar 21, 2011 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions
That ship has sailed.
If ND won’t join the conference for football, it’s not joining it for hockey. It’s a nice thought, but it ain’t going to happen.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Mar 21, 2011 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Indiana or Illinois
seem like they would be the most likely to elevate club teams.
For every complex problem, there is an answer that is simple, easy to understand, and wrong.
Illinois is a long shot
There really isn’t the capital to invest in Illinois’ arena or in elevating the program. I’ve heard a lot of rumors about Indiana but nothing solid enough to suggest that they’ll actually do it. If I’m betting, I think Indiana and possibily Northwestern (just because it’s the most logical school to add hockey) make the most sense. The sad thing is Northwestern has taken NO steps towards adding a program, so unless Indiana goes varsity there are really no solid prospects for adding another team.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Mar 21, 2011 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually
Illinois has a surprisingly good club team and all of their games sell out… it’s not a huge stretch of the imagination
When we get the Pig, the Jug and the Axe, we'll have one hell of a picnic
I play against a lot of their alumni
It’s not a talent issue (b/c the state is loaded with D1 players), it’s more a capital outlay for improvements to the facilities issue. At least that’s my understanding.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Mar 21, 2011 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions
True
Their rink is a dump, and I don’t even think it’s international sized… but it’s not like they’re short on space for expansion…
When we get the Pig, the Jug and the Axe, we'll have one hell of a picnic
Would be nice to see...
if Iowa would look into upgrading their hockey club to D1 status. If they do, they might have them play at Carver-Hawkeye or build a hockey-specific arena posibly right next to Carver-Hawkeye. I know that this would probably be a long shot as well, but would be nice to see.
Well, with a hockey league going into effect, all we need now is a lacrosse league… :)
Nos. 7 (and 8)
I’ve made a couple of inquiries as to potential new Big 10 hockey schools. The answer has been—publicly—that nothing is on the horizen. However, Indiana is officially on record as wanting to replace Assembly Hall. Although it hasn’t been stated publicly, I think they’d be nuts to build a new basketball without at least having the capability of installing ice at a later date (Penn State made this mistake, and it took $80+ million to drop in their lap to make hockey happen). What would be needed to get this arena moving? Probably a kick in the pants from an attention-starved billionaire with ties to the school and an interest in sports. Paging Mr. Cuban, Mr. Cuban to the white courtesy phone please!!!
Regarding Illinois, they’re generally in the same boat, that is until you throw in the fact that the state is broke. In other words, the hurdles are massive.

by 

















