Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant's Post-Game 5 Outfits

They All Come Tumbling Down

If we move past our normal callousness and indifference toward the shadier aspects of college athletics that we're all familiar with but choose to ignore, Wednesday's HBO Real Sports wherein they alleged a pay for play scheme at Auburn (supported by four former Auburn players) was... well... shocking. To be honest, I'm not sure what to call it. In so many ways it was confirmation of what we already know about the larger world of college football. Still, there it was. Right there in our face, waving at us like that weirdo we don't want to talk to as we stare down at our shoes hoping, praying, he didn't see us. But he did, and on Wednesday he was yelling his HELLLLLOOO right into our face. Just like Wednesday's special, you have no choice but to stand there, look him straight in the eye, force a smile, and hope that the experience is short and final.

Regardless of how hard we try to avoid walking into this deranged soul, he always seems to find us. We go to great lengths to pretend he doesn't exist, to shield ourselves from accidentally running into him. Yet we always do. And we pretend to be surprised that it happened. It's never a pleasant experience because we never deal with it head on. We always slink from the responsibility of addressing things directly, and so it happens again and again, and each time it gets worse. Wednesday's special was as bad as it's been in a long, long time. And it's bad, bad news for anyone associated with or mentioned in it.

Sadly, this isn't the first or only set of horrific allegations we've seen since the crystal ball was handed out in early January. We've seen four different Auburn players arrested and charged with burglary. There've been athletes across the country beating the hell out of civilians. There's Tatgate or Tresselgate or whatever you want to call the burgeoning disaster that is exploding in Columbus. Then there is the Fiesta Bowl sandal which not only has the potential to kill off a BCS bowl game, but to land a lot of people in federal prison. Now we get with two new scandals in a single day.

Lost in the response to the HBO special was ESPN's story that they had uncovered that Willie Lyles, the "street agent" who is tied to the pending recruiting disaster at Oregon, was shopping LSU's Patrick Petersen around to college teams, at least and specifically including Texas A&M, for $80,000. The Auburn pay for play scandal has been examined at length by a number of people, but the impact of this explosion of allegations isn't limited to the War Eagles. The collateral damage is significant.

Stanley McClover (a former Auburn player) told Andrea Kremer that unknown persons at LSU and Michigan State engaged in the infamous "cash handshake" while McClover attended their camps as a high school student in an attempt to persuade him to attend their school. Then McClover dropped a bomb on Ohio State that no Buckeye fan or father of a female student at Ohio State ever, ever, ever wants to hear (text courtesy 11W).

Andrea Kremer to Stanley McClover: "What did you say to the guy when he hands you five hundred dollars?"

McClover: "Thank you and I’m seriously thinking about coming to LSU."

Kremer voiceover: "But McClover says there were money handshakes from boosters at other football camps too. At Auburn for a couple hundred dollars and at Michigan State. All the schools denied any wrongdoing. And things really started heating up a few months later when he went to Ohio State for an official visit where schools get a chance for one weekend to host prospective athletes. McClover says there were money handshakes from alumni there too. About a thousand dollars. And something else to entice him."

McClover: "They send girls my way. I partied. When I got there I met up with a couple guys from the team. We went to a party and they asked me to pick any girl I wanted."

Kremer: "Did she offer sexual services?"

McClover: "Yes."

Kremer: "Did you take them?"

McClover: "Yes."

Kremer: "McClover committed to Ohio State right after that weekend. The recruiter at Ohio State who says he dealt with McClover that weekend denied the school was involved in any wrongdoing."

***********

I'm not sure when things started to fall apart. I'm really not. Though I probably should be. This isn't anything new and it's nothing we haven't seen before. It wasn't too long ago that we saw Charles Thompson in an orange jumpsuit being stuffed into a police car and thought to ourselves "How did this get so out of hand?" We smiled silently to ourselves that the bad man had been caught and that decent society could live again, ignoring the blood on our hands and the money we'd spent feeding the beast we perceived was being led away in handcuffs. Then we went back to our daily routine pretending that everything was right with the world again. But the beast hadn't been taken away. He'd walked away with us the moment we averted our eyes and settled into our homes as if it was a part of our furniture. We didn't want the beast taken away, after all. We just wanted it to be a little less obvious.

We all know what's happening but comfort ourselves by saying we really don't knowit for certain. A handshake here, a car payment there, money for pizza or a jersey. It only happens in the abstract. Until it happens for real. We attempt to limit our involvement and our association with this beast with caveats, excuses and feigned lack of knowledge. We distance ourselves from it by shaking our head and asking a rhetorical "why"?

We sympathize with the actors in this drama because we wish we were them. Talented 19 year-olds with a free ride and the libido of a prize race horse out to stud. We see the money they generate and say "That's just not fair" as if it means something to anyone else. Maybe we say it to sound sympathetic, inspired, or visionary about the "abuse" we see before our eyes. Maybe we say it to cleanse ourselves of our role in feeding the beast that happily consumes our money, weekends and free moments in exchange providing an escapism that only a clear September Saturday can provide. So the cycle of violation, outrage, punishment, and self-cleansing renews with every spring.

Star-divide

For every Charles Thompson who was disciplined there is always another who will take up his cause. Nice condos. Sweet rides. Handshakes of incomparable value. It hasn't changed. Yet each time we gasp as if we've witness a person shot in cold blood right infront of us. The horror! The humanity. The TV guide, please.

Now the men we entrusted our young men to appear no different than the two bit peddler hawking his wares by the 7-11, yet we continue to ask more of them and expect more of them than they can possibly deliver. Humorously, it is us, not them, who made the rules. We demanded a 90,000 seat stadium filled to the brim to watch a winning football team, goddammit. Your stars aren't high enough, why is that? 7-5 will get you fired. I don't care what the other guy is doing, you're supposed to win. By the way, you're responsible for everything in and out of your control at this program. Got it? Great. If you'll excuse me, my blinders are ready for pickup.

Now comes the time where we point fingers and tell those who will listen "I knew that was going on." Of course we knew. How could we miss it. It was all over TMZ, deadspin, HBO, Maury, Judge Judy, or the internets. But for every accusatory look and wag of the finger we say a silent prayer, to no deity in particular, thanking them for not punishing our school and offering whatever sacrifice we can think of to curry their favor. God forbid the light of day should shine brightly on our school. We don't want that. That we know for certain. We want to watch the game be played and let the rest sort itself out behind the closed door or in the shadows, or somewhere where we can't see where the steak before us is coming from. But that steak better be perfect. The beast is hungry.

No one is clean in this little play. The rulemakers turn a blind eye to the violations that occur directly in front of them, lest they be forced to act to stem the fountain of money pouring out of the veins of the networks, bowls, and consumers. Our coaches shrink from their responsibilities, prodded by our win at all costs desires, yet aware that they have crossed a river they can never cross again. The players take what is offered be it sex, drugs, or money because, well, they can; who cares if they know it's wrong. Then there is us. Our tickets, our sweatshirts, our boosterism, our desire to know and see all that occurs with 19 year old kids. We want to know them, to be their friends, because they are the people we'd trade places with instantly if the opportunity arose.

Where did it all go wrong? But wait... looking back, when was it ever right? When were these good ole' days of yore we remember so fondly? What about all those National Championships and wins in the big game. Wasn't it working then, wasn't it right? Maybe... but no... no it wasn't. Before television and even after it, the college game was a segregated as the rest of the world, and in some places moreso. But slowly that seemed to change as more and more money poored into the beast. Once the game became important enough to bring in real money, it wasn't a game anymore. It was television. Entertainment. It became shoes, books, lithographs, glasswear, showtime, and it was all there waiting for our consumption which we greedily inhaled.

Certainly it wasn't that bad in the 70's we think to ourselves, things only got out of control recently. Welll, no. The 70's brought us the pay for play scandal at Oklahoma State. The 80's? SMU's "Pony Express", South Carolina's steroid episodes, and Oklahoma's "Sorrid Story." These were just abnormalities right? No. They were precursors of things to come. The out of control Miami teams of the 90's, the USC Bush teams of the 00's, and now this the slate of allegations that have dropped from the sky. When did it all go so wrong?

Maybe the answer to our query is the obvious. It was never right to begin with. It was a fallacy that we allowed to grow into a beast because it gave us more of what we wanted. It was a sham, a house of cards, a decpetion from the beginning. It was a kid's project made out of popscicle sticks, glue and duct tape that we happily masqueraded as the statue of David. And there it is at auction, reeling in millions in bids at auction despite the obviousness of its falsity. But no one wants to admit what it is. So long as everyone shares the same willful delusion, we can go on.

Still, what we have seen is bad. The offenders must be punished. They must be brought to justice. Justice is what the beast desires. Justice will bring everything back to equilibrium and our game will go on as before. The beast remains. Satiated momentarily. But it will grow hungry again, and the cycle will resume.

***********

Somewhere the system is broken. The ills are readily apparent but the cures are not. We argue over what truly causes the problem in the first place, how it really affects our patient, and find fault in others' determinations just as they find fault in ours.

There isn't a simple cure to this, just as there is no guarantee that it will ever stop happening under the system we've put in place and done everything in our power to maintain. Regardless of this, kids will still be kids. They will make bad choices and they will influence others among them to do the same. Even the most viliglant of coaches can't watch his players 24 hours a day. They are, after all, college kids. They go out, they drink, they spend money, they call home for more so that they can continue to do so. In some cases this is the first time they've been able to do these things, and the freedom acts like a drug whose need for they will never be able to fill.

Cash hand shakes, girls, shady street agents, coaches doing what we pray they wouldn't; all these things continue to happen with regularity irrespective of our outrage or the punishment doled out to the offenders. But what is the punishment? Suspensions for multi-millionaire coaches and sanctions for schools rather than the players who committed the "crimes."

The system is broken. And soon it, like the schools named on the HBO special or in print for their various offenses, will come tumbling down.

Comment 6 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Maize n Brew

Innocence Regained

Sep 2010 by Maize n Brew Dave - 10 comments

Check Please

Feb 2010 by Maize n Brew Dave - 2 comments

Of Legends and Echoes

Sep 2009 by Maize n Brew Dave - 4 comments

For All the Marbles

Mar 2009 by Maize n Brew Dave - 0 comments

Around SB Nation

Reflecting On Michel Hernandez

Aug 2009 from DRaysBay - 9 comments

Carl Crawford

Aug 2009 from DRaysBay - 151 comments

The Closing of the 2009 Season

Oct 2009 from DRaysBay - 27 comments

I'll Be in the Sky

Feb 2010 from DRaysBay - 73 comments

Comments

Display:

Whatever the reality...

the perception is certainly that pay for play is rampant. To the extent that the NCAA’s non-for-profit status is tied to that perception, and tied to keeping pay for play out of the system, the hammer has got to fall, fall soon, and fall hard.

If I were a fan of Auburn, Oregon, Ohio State, or any school having ties to Willie Lyles, I’d be very worried that my program was about to get pounded with sanctions and penalties. Auburn has a very real chance of losing the national championship and getting the death penalty.

For every complex problem, there is an answer that is simple, easy to understand, and wrong.

by MosherJordan on Apr 1, 2011 2:29 PM CDT reply actions  

personally

I’m moving further and further towards the “screw it just pay them over the table” camp.

Mr Pac Ten's Blog - 2007 2008 2009 2010

by MrPacTen on Apr 1, 2011 4:40 PM CDT reply actions  

But the NCAA isn't, and never will be, and their the one's who have a say.

For every complex problem, there is an answer that is simple, easy to understand, and wrong.

by MosherJordan on Apr 1, 2011 7:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Legitimate Student Employees

There should be a standard for allowing colleges and university to pay student/athletes for their time the way food service, library workers, etc. are paid. One argument against it is that they already get a scholarship, room, board, etc. Other students on scholarship are allowed to work on campus. In this instance, student/athletes are discriminated against. There should be a standard wage and hours for all schools to follow. Pay them for practice and not for games and travel time. Or vise-versa. Because someone is a gifted athlete, doesn’t mean he/she has pocket money. And as expensive as things are these days, the temptations are greater than ever to sell your things, take a money handshake, or drive a boosters Corvette. Also, with this type of remuneration in place, I think that the NCAA should lower the boom on violators. But that’s just me.

by PreachinTotheChoir on Apr 1, 2011 8:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Playing Devil's Advocate just a little.

How would payscale’s be determined? Would every scholarship guy get the same cut? Would you pay starters more to incentivize performance? What about your captains and team MVP’s?

Only football and basketball generate more revenue than they cost, and that only at power conferences. Start paying atheletes, and student fees will go up across the country, and the biggest profit sink sports will be dropped. While there are certainly a few NCAA administrators and functionaries who are making more money than they should at a non-profit, the reality is, as with most unions, the bargaining power of the collective benefits the whole, even if the leadership is partially corrupt.

Simply put, if universities get involved in paying atheletes, it does open a pandora’s box of unintended consequences.

That said, the restriction on atheletes being able to sell their likeness, or accept a stipend from a booster club, is without merit. Why can’t a Cam Newton, Denard Robinson, Charles Woodson, Terrell Pryor, etc. accept endorsement money from local (or even regional and national) companies to act as a product sponsor. How many commercials feature Peyton Manning? Do they feature Indiannapolis Colt’s QB Peyton Manning? No, they feature the person Peyton Manning, who is free to show up in a commercial wearing non-descript football uniform to promote a product. Why can’t college atheletes do the same thing? It’s not coming out of the NCAA’s pocket anymore than a Peyton Manning commercial is coming out of the NFL’s pocket.

As for alumni stipend type money, it already exists for Golf. They’re called an Evans Scholars. There is simply no reason why a rich ass alumni (or alumni fund) should not be allowed to provide scholarships that provide money to the student athelete in excess of the amount needed to pay for tuition, room and board. Evan’s scholars recieve money explicitly to make it unneccessary for them to take a summer job. From the Evan’s Scholars FB page:

“an Opportunity Grant of $4,000 a year intended to free scholars from the necessity of taking an ordinary summer job, allowing them to plan creative and life enhancing experiences which will expand their horizons and help them achieve their goals.”

As a graduate student in a PhD program, I recieved a fellowship that not only paid my tuition, but provided me money that would exempt me from having to perform the usual TA type activities, allowing me to focus on academic persuits more fully. It was entirely merit based. I see no compelling reason why outside parties cannot establish similar type scholarships and fellowships that explicitly give some tope student atheletes some “pocket cash” to help ease the burden of being essentially a high profile representative of the university.

For every complex problem, there is an answer that is simple, easy to understand, and wrong.

by MosherJordan on Apr 2, 2011 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

UNCLE! UNCLE!

MJ, you bring up many good points, and some are even valid. Apparently, I intended to fix a complex problem with a solution that was simple, easy to understand, and wrong. Well not completely wrong, but simple? Yes it was. However, I don’t see it as complex as all that. There would certainly be issues to work out. Universities and Colleges make millions on football and basketball. I don’t see the necessity of letting good athletes have to decide whether they should try to get away with something even though he works his tail off. He can’t add ‘another’ campus job to an already crowded schedule. I think a scholarship like you mentioned is a good idea. And I think it should be tightly run and checked for abuse. They are expected to represent the school. They are to look presentable, maybe have a decent suit. Some of those guys would have trouble buying off the rack, let me tell you.

By putting a choke hold on money for athletes (pay or scholarships), they’re causing more trouble than they are healing.

by PreachinTotheChoir on Apr 2, 2011 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An Unofficial Michigan Football Blog that covers everything related to the University of Michigan Wolverines. We also cover beer, tailgating and the absurdity of college sports in general.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help Nebraska represent the Big 10 and beat the SEC!
Small
Recruiting Help?!
Picture_1_small
Smotrycz to Maryland
Small
Robinson and Toussaint HIghlight Tape
Img_0616_small
Hardaway/Burke/Michigan Basketball/Samuel Adams
Img_0616_small
The Brew is BACK!
Img_0616_small
Can't stop watching this Mike Martin Video

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Maizenbrew_small Maize n Brew Dave

Tumblr_kxe3j1n8021qztjn5o1_500_small Zach Travis

Editors

Hobbes_small Alex Cook

Bo_small Remember Bo

Me_small Dave Ryan

Authors

James_dean_smiling2_small Beauford

Mgoblue_small SCM

Tate_small JC314

Floyd3_small Kyle McCann't

Aa10_small HoldTheRope

373022_198834423566677_135460436_n_small maize_in_spartyland

Dgdestroys_small DGDestroys