Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Shootings Near Thunder's Arena Follow Win Over Lakers

Relief

ANN ARBOR, MI - APRIL 16:  Head football coach Brady Hoke talks with his team during the annual Spring Game at Michigan Stadium on April 16, 2011 in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  (Photo by Leon Halip/Getty Images)

About a week ago I attended a Michigan Alumni Association event with more on my mind than I could really articulate. Oddly, for such an event, little of what was preoccupying me had to do with Michigan. Over the course of the last five plus years I've spent a good deal of my waking free time thinking about Michigan athletics simply because the time I had allowed it. But not then. The month surrounding this event had been a wonderful period in my professional career and my personal life. New doors were (and are) opening, trips were being planned, and my wife and I were having more fun than than a sugar-highed twelve-year old with a first-in-line pass at Disney World. So, caught up in it all, I really hadn't thought a whole lot about Michigan, Michigan football, or Michigan athletics. Frankly, I hadn't had time to. My real life had gleefully consumed my free moments. And it was wonderful.

Walking in to the room I was blissfully unaware of some of the events that had transpired across college football in the recent weeks. Tressel. The recruit commitments. The departures. It was an odd feeling to be a Michigan writer and to be so out of touch with what had been going on in the world that I'd covered for so long. Even so, I was strangely calm. Some of the people in attendance knew my alter ego. They knew about Maize n Brew and my alternate life on the interwebz. As I caught up with friends and fellow alumni, I downloaded chunks of my recent, very happy life to them. To a person, they reacted with a surprised, low whistle or the raised-eyebrow "wow" as I caught them up on what, exactly, I'd been up to. Like all info dumps, it was cathartic. I was finally able to do something I hadn't really been able to do with my schedule... talk with friends for more than twenty seconds on the phone. It was like off-loading a shipment of information before taking on a new one. You empty your tank of thoughts so that you can finally, mercifully add new ones. And as I downloaded, all of a sudden, I was able to talk football again.

So I started talking with the football dieheards. We talked about the spring game. Who looked good. Who looked meh. How the team seemed to respond. Who was out with injuries and who seemed to step up. While I'd been off the interwebz, I had been watching the BTN and reviewed the spring practice footage on MGoBlue.com. So I wasn't totally out of touch.

As we talked, I realized something strange. Specially, I wasn't worried anymore. There wasn't an overarching sense of nervousness or fear. The more I talked about the spring game, the players, the coaches and the upcoming season, the more I realized how relaxed I was discussing it. After three years of being on the edge of my seat, discussing how and why things should work, trying to calm those opposed to the prior administration and building up those who supported it, suddenly.... I didn't have to anymore. I was relaxed. I was happy. There was no nervousness or apprehension in talking about Michigan football. There were no excuses. There were no explanations. After three years of the opposite, this felt weird.

There I was. Tired. Happy. Distracted. Relieved.

It's hard to describe the anxiety associated with Michigan football over the last three years. I honestly don't mean this as a commentary on the coaching staff. It's more a commentary on myself. I desperately wanted the prior regime to succeed. But that desperation, in the face of mounting losses and the loud rumble of discontent in the fanbase, got to me. It really did. I can remember waking up in the middle of the night before the Notre Dame nervous and unable to sleep. I remember how physically uncomfortable I was leading up to game time and the feeling of uncertainty even after the game concluded. I remember that those feelings never went away as the season went on. It wasn't fun. And it got to me.

Star-divide

I had become so emotionally involved with personal desire to see Rodriguez succeed in the face of growing obstacles that I couldn't relax. There was always a criticism to answer, a mad fan or angry alumni to sedate, someone bitching about tradition or how things used to be to counter. They ceased to be discussions about the coach and became strangely personal to me. As if those concerns, those ill-phrased criticisms, those "HURHUR DICK ROD" slurs weren't aimed at him, they were aimed at me. These weren't well founded critiques based on poor on-field performance and a lack-luster understanding of what made Michigan, Michigan. No. These were personal attacks on me, dammit, because I supported the man. Pretty stupid, isn't it? But that's how I felt. Tired. Anxious. Conflicted. Defensive.

Talking football with my fellow alumni, it struck me just how excited they were about the season. For the first time in years, the fanbase seemed united in their desire to see Michigan's head coach succeed. Was there trepidation about the hiring? Sure. I think everyone expected that Michigan would hire a big name. Make a big splash in the coaching game. But then again, there was the admission by just about everyone that we made a "big splash" three years before. It also stood out that this cross section of Michigan alumni, recent grads to 30 year alums, all echoed the same sentiment: Hoke "gets it". He understands what makes Michigan, Michigan. He understands that the defense must be more than a tool to prep the offense, it must be able to stop someone. He knows what the "Ohio" game means and how important it is to every Michigan fan and alumni.

For the first time in three years, the focus of the conversation was on how the team will perform and not on why or why not the coach should wear the headset.

Maybe my faith here is misplaced. Maybe I've missed something. But I don't feel the same personal pressure for Hoke to succeed that I felt for Rodriguez. Rodriguez had, and made himself, so many obstacles to overcome. He was (and is) a good man who deserved better than he got. And because of that, so many of us took it personally that he wasn't accepted into the fold. What it comes down to is that being a Rodriguez supporter was equivalent to starting a race down a lap. You could make progress, but even if you got the lap back you were still in last place in the eyes of the spectators.

This isn't the case with Hoke. He's starting in the pole position. He's a good guy, a good man. But he's not starting at the disadvantage that Rodriguez did. He understands the culture. He didn't torch the bridges he'd built on the way to Ann Arbor (Kyle Turley to the contrary). He doesn't have the press out to draw and quarter him. He starts this race at the starting line rather than in the pits. As a result we can all judge him on a single thing. Wins and Losses. We don't have to worry about him explaining his understanding of Michigan. There's not going to be a constant string of bad press from the "friendly" media before kick off. He's had every possible, intangible advantage leading into the season. And now it's up to him to make the most of it.

Perhaps that explains my relief. He (and as a result, I) doesn't have to make up ground on the rest of the pack. I don't have to explain why he's a good person. I don't have to try to bridge the gap between the factions anymore. Everyone seems to be on the same page, waiting to see what happens to the 2011 football team rather than the coach.

It's kinda nice. And to be honest, it's a relief.

Comment 13 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It's hard to describe the anxiety associated with Michigan football over the last three years...

I honestly don’t mean this as a commentary on the coaching staff. It’s more a commentary on myself. I desperately wanted the prior regime to succeed. But that desperation, in the face of mounting losses and the loud rumble of discontent in the fanbase, got to me. It really did. I can remember waking up in the middle of the night before the Notre Dame nervous and unable to sleep. I remember how physically uncomfortable I was leading up to game time and the feeling of uncertainty even after the game concluded. I remember that those feelings never went away as the season went on. It wasn’t fun. And it got to me.

I had become so emotionally involved with personal desire to see Rodriguez succeed in the face of growing obstacles that I couldn’t relax. There was always a criticism to answer, a mad fan or angry alumni to sedate, someone bitching about tradition or how things used to be to counter. They ceased to be discussions about the coach and became strangely personal to me. As if those concerns, those ill-phrased criticisms, those “HURHUR DICK ROD” slurs weren’t aimed at him, they were aimed at me. These weren’t well founded critiques based on poor on-field performance and a lack-luster understanding of what made Michigan, Michigan. No. These were personal attacks on me, dammit, because I supported the man. Pretty stupid, isn’t it? But that’s how I felt. Tired. Anxious. Conflicted. Defensive.

Maybe my faith here is misplaced. Maybe I’ve missed something. But I don’t feel the same personal pressure for Hoke to succeed that I felt for Rodriguez. Rodriguez had, and made himself, so many obstacles to overcome. He was (and is) a good man who deserved better than he got. And because of that, so many of us took it personally that he wasn’t accepted into the fold. What it comes down to is that being a Rodriguez supporter was equivalent to starting a race down a lap. You could make progress, but even if you got the lap back you were still in last place in the eyes of the spectators…

Oh, wait, you already said this…My point is this captured my feelings and thoughts over the past 3 years up to now perfectly; except for the part about criticism from an angry fan or alumni. Hailing from the southeast, there arent many alumni or othe fans i know, but i did have plenty of criticism to answer from friends who like to pick on the Michigan fan in SEC country. Again, well put. Glad you got to hit the refresh button, summer will blow by before you know it and the end of August will usher in 4 diligent months of breaking down this years squad for us Michigan faithful to rec or debunk. Better get ready…Go Blue!

So wait, There's good cholesterol?

by Ouck Fhio on May 4, 2011 1:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Dave, You're Doing It Again

You’re (at least in some way) apologizing for or defending RR again. ISB,ISA, for whatever reason, RR was in over his head. For him to come into AA and dimantle the program the way he did was suicide. We all understand the idea of implementing a new system. We all (read I) don’t understand why he lost 9 games his first year. Why did he lose 7 his second year. What jackass completely dismantles the old before he has people for the new. Sorry, Dave, you and other apologists can blame the disunity for RR not succeeding or as you like to put it, not having the chance to succeed, but I say Road Apples!

I was also a supporter of RR’s hiring. I was excited at the idea of a wide open offense. I knew he was not the right guy before half-way through season one. I still wanted him to succeed, but by then he had a lot to prove to me. How many of his 22 loses at Michigan were we the less talented team? Where we lacked talent was along the sidelines, not on the field. And that doesn’t mean I think they were a wealth of talent, but were still talented.

And all he had to do to get some love from the faithful was win. Winning cures a lot of ills and makes you lots of friends. For 2 years in a row the nay-sayers got to start the off season right after losing to OSU. A full 4 to 5 weeks more to lament about his shortcomings. He couldn’t beat a bad Toledo team that first year. That was the game that told me “we have a problem.” New system or not, you have to make your system fit your players. Seems like someone else has said that in the last few months. I don’t think RR ever considered what he had before deciding what he was going to run.

Anyway, Dave, glad you’re relaxing a little more now. I’m looking forward to the Hoke era. Go Blue!!

by PreachinTotheChoir on May 4, 2011 7:22 PM CDT reply actions  

On the contrary...

I would argue that you are doing it again. Who the hell cares if Dave is qualifying the Rodriguez era? Dave is talking about being burdened with a very personal feeling of success or failure tied to Rodriguez’s tenure as coach — something I can strongly identify with. This has almost nothing to do with Rodriguez and everything to do with the way some of felt like we constantly had to be on the defensive during his time as coach.

I am as big a Rodriguez support as you could find, and even I wouldn’t claim that the man didn’t do a lot to earn his eventual fate. But you will notice that myself and most everyone else (even Brian at Mgo) has moved on from any talk about Rodriguez other than putting him in his historical place among Michigan coaches in perspective and examining what went wrong during his time here.

So yes, you’re doing it again. Jumping on the man’s grave because you, “knew he was not the right guy before halfway through season one,” and feel the need to remind everyone of that.

You want to know what I’m most bitter about? That we can’t have a honest discussion about Rich Rodriguez’s three years as head coach without somebody spouting off a string of Michigan Man platitudes, “apologist” accusations, followed by a snarky “he got fired, get over it.”

We get it. You wanted someone else. Now, if you don’t have anything constructive to add, don’t comment.

by Zach Travis on May 4, 2011 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

What do you get?

I may say the same of you and being constructive. I suppose I may be jumping on his grave, but that’s preferable to digging him up and lamenting his self inflicked demise. I’m not the one that wrote the article. Dave wrote mostly a good and interesting piece. But he chose to go down the road of that lame excuse of “lack of unity and lack of support” putting “him a lap down.” It’s not accurate nor is it reasonable. I’ll not apologize for pointing out inaccuracies when I see them. I also “get” what Dave was saying. He invested a lot of himself in the RR era. I usually like Dave’s writing and this is no exception. I also usually respond to things I may agree with strongly or disagree with.

I wasn’t looking for a “Michigan Man” per se in 2007 or 2011. I wanted the best they could get to lead them. If he has connections to Michigan, great, if not, will he lead us to where we want to be. And I never said, “he was fired, get over it.” At least I don’t think I have. I wasn’t even sure he should be fired after the bowl game. Yes, I felt we had the wrong guy in year one, but as I said, I still wanted him to succeed. I’m just glad somebody else makes these decisions.

And I wouldn’t mind “honest discussions” about the RR era, if they are honest. But anyone who starts talking about how disadvantaged he was isn’t being honest. Apologists want everyone to believe that there had to be other reasons beside his own incompetance to cause him to fail so utterly and completely. And if Dave says it again, I’ll argue it again, probably. It’s not like it matters that much. Unless you’re an apologist for the RR era.

And if Hoke does what RR did, he should be shown the door too.

by PreachinTotheChoir on May 4, 2011 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can't really agree with what you're saying. Mind if I disagree?

Particularly in the last paragraph. It should be said that I do agree with Dave on most of his points – and in our conversations, we generally feel the same way about how the Rich Rodriguez era was handled, and the causes and consequences of its failure. I also note that you generally agree with what Dave said, so most of this is an exercise in semantics…

Rich Rodriguez was incredibly disadvantaged coming into Michigan for several reasons, including a seemingly hostile media, the clamoring for a “Michigan Man” which, even if you personally don’t necessarily think is a necessity in a coach, you must concede that many people out there wanted a Michigan Man and since RR wasn’t, that was a strike. Maybe not three strikes, but certainly not a blank slate, either.

Then you have player attrition, defensive recruiting issues in the last few years of Carr, and so forth. And I can’t agree that he was incompetent. Stubborn? Sure. The man is a damn good football coach that just didn’t fit in at Michigan. At the end of the day, sure, that’s because he didn’t win, and he didn’t do a good job at Michigan. Incompetent? No. Lack of effort? no. Lack of congruence? Yes. He’ll succeed somewhere else.

This is one of those times where I can’t change your mind, and you can’t change mine, so we can just have a good laugh about it later and not take this too seriously – I’m a Rich Rod apologist, but I have little doubt that the last three years were some of the most painful in the history of my Michigan fandom. And I don’t think that you weren’t enjoying him failing either.

Go Maize, Blue, and Gray!

by Remember Bo on May 5, 2011 4:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Losing to Toledo

No problem agreeing to disagree.

The double negative in your last sentence has me confused. I hope you were saying that I wasn’t enjoying his failing either, because I certainly wasn’t. I had a hard time watching much college football during those three years because I didn’t want to hear about Michigan’s troubles. I am not so stupid as to think wishing RR to fail is going to help my team. I don’t think very highly of people that use that kind of logic.
 
I’ll try to behave myself as I try explain why I say that the “disadvantages” that are said to have plagued RR have been over stated and have nothing to do with his failing as theUM football coach. I am going to use the Toledo game from season 1 as my reference point as I have said before that was when I knew he wasn’t going to get it done. And I think that was about as low as he got. I won’t be using stats from the game, just some overall observations. My points aren’t so much explanations as to why an issue doesn’t affect a teams performance as they are questions as too how would these issues cause loses. So hang on, it could be a bumpy ride

I accept that there are many Michigan faithful that are still aghast at the hiring of Rich Rod. But how does that translate to the field? How does that translate to losses. How does the lack of alumni "attaboys" make him not get a far better team up to confront a local rival. I understand they are a MAC team and MAC teams do beat B1G teams, but they hadn’t until then, beat Michigan and Toledo is the second closest MAC team to U of Michigan. There are "vicinity rivalries" all over the B1G and MAC. How about CMU and MSU, Ball State and Indiana, any team in Ohio and OSU? Ok, even if you don’t agree, you can see what I mean about the Toledo game being a rivalry, even if it is a small one . Anyway, I don’t see where alums calling for a Michigan Man and/or personally not liking RR can cause him not to prepare his team. It’s not like the Michigan Man crowd was on the practice field or on the sidelines. It’s not an ideal situation, but I don’t see how it leads to losing to Toledo.

I accept that there are jack-ass reporters out there. Boy do I accept that idea. Chances of finding an unbiased journalist anywhere today are as slim as my next vacation being in Pakistan. They all have agendas and it shows in their work. I know that bad press can affect things if it goes on long enough. I’ll concede that. It affects recruiting and attendance. Have those suffered over the past 3 years? For the guys on the team and that came to M after RR was hired, shouldn’t there be motivation in that? Most seemed to like their coach and the idea of him being fired was very distressing to many or most of them that I heard. Again I don’t see how unfair press coverage, even if you can prove it, has any bearing on them losing to Toledo. Unfair press is par for the course, but that’s beside the point. Was RR reading the articles to the team? Maybe he should have read them to the team. I’m sure players read at least some of these articles. So . . . that means . . . uh, what’s the significance of that? I can’t seem to find any significance in that either.

Much has been made about Lloyd leaving the cupboard bare. Even if I accept that maybe they were short of talent to take on the likes of Ohio State, it’s still a mighty big gap to drop below Toledo on the talent scale. Were they really "losing to Toledo talented" that year? And Toledo wasn’t a powerhouse that year. They were lousy at 3-9? Once again, I don’t see the lack of talent as an excuse to lose to Toledo. An excuse to lose to Ohio State? Well there is no reason to lose to Ohio State! lol Was last years defense the 108th most talented squad in the country? I’m going to bet not. We can talk about injuries, or players leaving, etc. But it really didn’t seem to matter who was in, the results were the same.
   
I can’t say my arguments are grand, well stated and would stand to a good cross examination. But there they are. Many accusatory excuses have been thrown out there about why RR failed. I haven’t heard one that seems even plausible to me that should have held him back. Even if these reasons were absolutely “boiled down to their essence” true, how does this cause him to field a lousy team week after week in season one especially? His immediate lack of success was probably his biggest mistake. And that was because he put in plays for which he has the wrong players. He gave those who may already not like him the ammunition to fire back at him. “Clean slate” or not, the downfall was his and his alone.

I liked Rich Rod when he go to AA. I still like him. I certainly don’t hate him. I think he’ll get a coaching job in the not too distant future. He’ll be successful again and may even challenge for a National Championship, depending on where he lands. But for whatever reason, success at Michigan eluded him. I just don’t think it had anything to do with him being at a disadvantage.

by PreachinTotheChoir on May 5, 2011 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't as much buy the "lack of support" causing him to lose games.

Although it didn’t help the atmosphere around the program, didn’t help with recruiting (insert Dantonio “they aren’t happy with him, he’s gonna be gone next year” recruiting tactic here), and ultimately drove the witch hunt, I mean freep investigative piece, that brought on “major” sancitons. If you did your job in a wind tunnel with one million angry people watching your performance on television and calling for your head, it might not directly affect your work, but you have to admit it wouldn’t be an ideal situation, right? Rodriguez did some things to bring on scrutiny, but he also walked into a shit storm that was more concerned with his inherent hickness than football. That you yourself didn’t judge him until you were sure he would fail (less than a half dozen game in to his tenure I might add) is noble, but plenty of others didn’t even give him that chance.

As for the cupboard and it’s bareness, the offensive line in 08 was pieced together with freshmen, position switchs, and one lone returning starter. The lone receiver with experience was Greg Matthews. Brandon Minor had yet to show he could hold on to the ball consistently, and Carlos Brown went down like a top. Don’t even get me started on the quarterback situation. That offense should have been good enough to beat Toledo. You are 100% right on that, and it was entirely the offenses failing. However, this group would have struggled to win 6 games no matter who the coach. By the next year when the offense had begun to develop, the defense lost some key pieces but didn’t have depth to force competition at linebacker — leading to three years of Ezeh — and didn’t have anything in the defensive backfield after Cissoko went thug.

Rodriguez made some huge mistakes, and was ultimately too stubborn with his system, game planning, and play calls sometimes, but the situation was far from perfect, and unfortunately it was set up in a way that Rodriguez had to be prefect to win enough right away to gain the support of the league of old blue hairs who were clamoring for someone else from the get go, while also giving Rich enough time to fill in holes in recruiting from the flurry of flame-outs and transfers. We all know how it ended up. So yes, I believe Rich was in a somewhat disadvantaged position. Agree to disagree I guess.

by Zach Travis on May 6, 2011 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

My Apologies to Dave

I some how (not some how, I know “how”) took a very open and moving post of Dave’s and managed to make it something he never intended—something I imagine he was trying to avoid. I took a few sentences out of a great post and chose to spout off my opinion. I need to watch my “what, when & where’s”.

I’m just sorry Dave had to take verbal abuse from the idiots that can’t just disagree, they have to punctuate there remarks with a “You suck” and worse. I can’t imagine having your labor of love turn into just labor of pain—but not labor pains, mind you. I realize this blog is where you post your opinions, but probably not those opinions in this particular post. I’ll still express my opinions on all sorts of unimportant stuff here. I’ll just try to be more judicious about where I post it. And Zach, I’m sorry if I repeated myself, but about knowing things were bad in season one. When you don’t see who you’re “talking to” you forget that the readers have probably read your earlier posts. I’ll keep that in mind.

And I think that Zach and Remember Bo made some good points about RR’s situation in A2. Not enought to change my mind, but still worth reading.

Glad you’re back Dave. And happy that you have a real life outside of the blog. And a great post.

by PreachinTotheChoir on May 6, 2011 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

BTW

Great piece Dave. It’s good to have you around here again after your little sabbatical. Glad to hear things are going well for you.

by Zach Travis on May 4, 2011 7:55 PM CDT reply actions  

agreed

time to dust off the ol’ MnB username…

Go Maize, Blue, and Gray!

by Remember Bo on May 5, 2011 3:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

I felt the same way

about RR. Although I didn’t have as much contact with RR haters as Dave. I’m just glad that is all behind us, and am very excited about the upcoming season and cannot wait for September to get here. I think Hoke is going to do a great job and get this program back where it belongs—in the top 5 (but probably not in 2011..lol).

Anyway, I’m glad that you got that weight off your chest, Dave. Let’s Go Blue!!

by futureUofMfbmom on May 8, 2011 10:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

An Unofficial Michigan Football Blog that covers everything related to the University of Michigan Wolverines. We also cover beer, tailgating and the absurdity of college sports in general.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help Nebraska represent the Big 10 and beat the SEC!
Small
Recruiting Help?!
Picture_1_small
Smotrycz to Maryland
Small
Robinson and Toussaint HIghlight Tape
Img_0616_small
Hardaway/Burke/Michigan Basketball/Samuel Adams
Img_0616_small
The Brew is BACK!
Img_0616_small
Can't stop watching this Mike Martin Video

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Maizenbrew_small Maize n Brew Dave

Tumblr_kxe3j1n8021qztjn5o1_500_small Zach Travis

Editors

Hobbes_small Alex Cook

Bo_small Remember Bo

Me_small Dave Ryan

Authors

James_dean_smiling2_small Beauford

Mgoblue_small SCM

Tate_small JC314

Floyd3_small Kyle McCann't

Aa10_small HoldTheRope

373022_198834423566677_135460436_n_small maize_in_spartyland

Dgdestroys_small DGDestroys