The Bold Choice: The Michigan Coaching Transition Before Year Four
As an athletic director there are few decisions in your professional life that carry as much weight as hiring a new football coach. It's really a zero sum game if you're an athletic director. If the coach is awesome everyone will forget that you hired him. The coach is elevated to God-like status and everyone looks back at the decision to hire coach X as an obvious choice. If the coach fizzles or outright fails, the athletic director is crucified for making a stupid hire. Fans ask the obvious hindsight questions about "knowledge of tradition," "fit," "personnel," "the conference," "winning enough," and they're all generally right. In hindsight. The bottom line, you're either a goat or someone who competently did his or her job. No more. No less.
There is a caveat though. Sometimes an athletic director will take a chance. They'll hire the guy that no one is talking about. The guy with potential, but no track record. The otherguy on the hiring list or even the other guy that wasn't on everyone else's list. Fan sometimes call it stupid or insane or even desperate. Maybe if the hire fails, then they're right. If the hire works out well, the athletic director looks like a genius. But at the time it all goes down it's just one thing. Bold.
Irrespective of how you felt about Rich Rodriguez, one thing remains fairly clear. Terminating a coaching staff before it completes its fourth year at the helm is a dangerous proposition. Going into year four just about every player on the roster was recruited by that coaching staff. They are all familiar with that coaching staff's play book. And they are all finally ready to play at their highest level in that system. Say what you want about players making plays, but on field excellence comes from every player on the field knowing what they're supposed to do and executing it without hesitation.
In reality, it takes about three to four years for any kind of coaching transition to bare legitimate results. Obviously, you want your team and staff to be on an upward projection. As a team improves through years one, two and three, you expect to see the big payoff in year four. In year four you have seniors raised in the system. In year four you've got an entrenched coaching staff with stability. In year four you're deep at critical positions. In year four, well, at Michigan, you're supposed to compete for a championship. As everyone's well aware, Rich Rodriguez never got to year four at Michigan.
It's debatable as to why. Supporters point to the potentially planet crushing offense that was set to reign hell-fire on the Big Ten as a reason Rodriguez should've stayed. Detractors point to the soul crushing defensive failures over Rodriguez' tenure as a reason he deserved the axe. Supporters point to the steady improvement in the wins column as proof the coaching staff was on the right track. Detractors point to the three straight blowout losses to legitimate teams to close the season as proof the track Michigan was on had derailed. No matter your position on whether Rodriguez and his staff should've been let go, there are arguments for and against.
Here's the thing, there wasn't a clear answer to whether the coaching staff should've been retained. It's not like this was the end of Willingham era at Notre Dame, when Ty considered recruiting and coaching as "things that interfered with nap time." Rodriguez was busting his behind on the recruiting trail. But, he also hired GERG and the defense looked like it couldn't put out a smoking barbque with a fire truck. The staff was working hard but the consistent results didn't show on both sides of the ball.
As a result, Michigan's athletic director was left with the unenviable task of making the difficult, final call on Rodriguez and his staff. Play it safe and stay the course or make the bold decision to move on, arguably without a successor lined up. He chose the latter.
It's not like it was an easy choice. Michigan had one definite prospect in Jim Harbaugh, one fan favorite in Les Miles, and a lot of people suggesting that seppuku was a requirement if neither were retained. Dave Brandon went another director, and chose to put his stamp on the program and his butt on the line. Willingly. There were easier selections. There were easier directions. Instead he made the bold choice to go with the man whom he felt would the best fit for the program. He went with, to an extent, his gut. Trusting that his research, interviews, contacts, and har work had led him to the right decision.
As it turned out, initially it wasn't a popular one. But over time fans and alumni have started to see why he made that choice. The hiring of good football coaches. The embracing of Michigan's traditions and history. The outreach to former players and degree to which many have returned to the program. The recruiting, oh good God the recruiting. Thus far, Brandon's choice to move on has proven prescient.
It wasn't the easy choice. It wasn't the one everyone agreed with. It was the Bold choice. And only wins and losses will tell for sure if it was the right one.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hoke Will Be Successful
Whether Brandon’s choice of Hoke was a lucky strike, or a sign that he is in fact Nostradamus 2011, the result is the same: we have a very good coach at the helm of the program.
I hope he wins. I like the guy. I’d like the program to have great success and see Hoke stick around for as long as he wants to.
A mascot, or advertising in the stadium, on the other hand, would not be the bold choice. Either would be the wrong choice. Here’s hoping that Brandon knows the difference.
The Bold & the Bountiful
It sure was a bold for DB to make the move of changing coaches in January. I think he could have taken the “easy” way out and not changed coaches and hoped next year would be the year. I’m sure you can get arguments that RR shouldn’t have been fired. And you would also get arguments that he never should have been hired. But whatever the argument, DB’s post season exchange of coaches is a very daring move. Whatever someones take on DB, no one can call him timid.
I’ll agree that holding on to important traditions is more important than advertising and mascots. I think those ideas mention would be bold moves, not right moves but bold ones. In the movie Jurassic Park, Jeff Goldblum’s character has a great line where he says, "You were so busy asking “can we re-create dinosaurs?” when you should have been asking “should we?” There are many moves that the AD can make regarding the Stadium or a mascot, and some might be bold, but that doesn’t make them right.
I still kind of like the idea of the Civil War Cavalry soldier. Nah, too complicated. You’d have to explain it too often. Can you imagine having to explain it too 80 Buckeyes then having to explain it to all their fans! No thanks!
Your integrity is revealed in crisis, not determined by it.
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jun 30, 2011 9:54 PM CDT reply actions
hoke was great pick for um he is right mix for a head coach at um beause he knowes how to reciut both offensive and deffinive players and will use offensive sytem that is allready in place but will only add part of his offensive sytem as he goes along um will use alot of the spread offensive sytem this year but as year goes on you will sea more of hoke pro offensive sytem as year goes on they will do want thier starting qcb does will and he will run alot more plays for the runing backs this year in the power game this is how ithink um offensive will lock licke this year 40% spread offensive sytem of last year and 45%new hoke offensive and 15%old big ten power runing game as head coach he hired a great offensive coach to help get right mix of plays to use in games and he put toghther solid coching staff on the defisive side of the ball and as fans it will tacke him longer to fix all short coiming on deffesive side of the ball but give him a couylpe of recuriting class and you will have a soild um deffensive taem we our use to seing
e.e. cummings, is that you?
Punctuation is your friend.
As your attorney, it is my duty to inform you that it is not important that you understand what I'm doing or why you're paying me so much money. What's important is that you continue to do so. -HST
e.e.'s problem could be
Not all keyboards come with that little dot thing that you put at the end of sentences. Yeah, that little thing right there. OH, there goes another one. Periods, that’s what they call ‘em. Like in hockey. Maybe the keyboard he’s using is a stick and he’s used to an automatic. I thought he might have been using twitter but there is way too many characters for that. Still could be a little keyboard though.
Hey, I just stopped in for the beer.
Your integrity is revealed in crisis, not determined by it.
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 1, 2011 12:08 PM CDT reply actions
I still think Coach has lost weight.
Your integrity is revealed in crisis, not determined by it.
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 1, 2011 12:11 PM CDT reply actions
Bullshit
“In reality, it takes about three to four years for any kind of coaching transition to bare legitimate results.”
Since the BCS championship game was instituted in 1998, the national championship has been won by a team with a head coach that has been at that University for less than 4 years
NINE OUT OF THIRTEEN TIMES!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCS_National_Championship_Game
Why do people keep making excuses for Rich Rod?
What would Yzerman do?
as such,
getting rid of Rich Rod should be an easy choice and not bold at all. It’s only bold because our fan base isn’t really that intelligent.
What would Yzerman do?
Another sign of intelligence:
Is understanding that getting rid of the major component of your football program is not a decision that is made in haste regardless of all snarling and griping. DB was very deliberate about the decision. January is no time to be hiring a coach. But he knew the program was in trouble. RR couldn’t put together a game plan over 5 weeks that made them look like a team. If not for that collapse, RR is still coaching in A2 next fall. It would have been easy for him to let RR stay. He was under contract and had a “winning” record this year. I think a lot of, if not most AD’s would have kept RR. But DB has a different perspective than most AD’s. He’s an alum and former football player. So it may not have been a bold move for a fan, an alum, or a former player to make, but for an AD, and he is still an AD, not just an alum and former player, it was bold, monster bold. (Cajonnes the size of watermelon.)
Your integrity is revealed in crisis, not determined by it.
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 1, 2011 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Another sign of intelligence is not listening to Josh Groban.
When you are a new AD, is it more “bold” to fire the worst football coach in your program’s entire history (considering win-loss and ncaa violations), or to bring in your own guy who does things exactly how they were don for 100 years?
I think MOST ADs put a new guy in. It’s much easier to bring in your own guy and start from scratch than to have all the Rich Rod haters on your back. I would say that getting rid of Rich Rod, who was a complete embarassment (You Raise Me Up? For Reals?) was much less “bold” than keeping him.
What would Yzerman do?
Who's Josh Groban?
Huz, maybe it is a little over blown that DB had to be bold to fire his football coach in January. Maybe. But I think you make it sound entirely too simple. “He was our worst coach ever, so how hard is it to fire him?” I contend that had Michigan done anything in that game but get blown out in an embarrassing manner, RR is still coaching in A2. (yeah, I know I already said that.) It was not the plan to get a new coach after the bowl game. Remember Williams at MSU being terminated after the Michigan game a few years ago. A reporter asked Williams something to the effect of “can you get your guys to believe again?” (Not exactly that but that idea) Williams said “I don’t know.” The AD there said the coach had lost the team. Boom he’s gone. The AD there knew he had to do something. It was a bold stand for him to make mid-season. Some may not think so because the Spartans weren’t doing much and were headed for another disappointing season. As a fan it doesn’t seem like that big of a deal. “Throw the bum otta there.” Any inclination of what that does to the team? Same for firing RR. DB doesn’t have to deal with just the fans and power brokers of UM football. He has to deal with the players and the parents of those players. DB has to determine the teams fallout and retention of players if he fires the coach. Remember the rumblings about whether Denard was going to say? He could have left. What if there had been a mass exodus after RR left and Coach Hoke couldn’t stop it? All of a sudden RR doesn’t seem as bad as another 3-9 season.
You can’t just say he was our worst coach ever and it didn’t take boldness to fire him in January, well into recruiting season, no prospects of a replacement confirmed, coaches lining up all over the land to say “I’m not going to Michigan,” (that was after RR was fired) and the retention of one of the games most exciting players and a lot of other talented players on the line. You are looking at the decision with the hindsight that, so far, things have gone pretty well for the Wolverines. Denard & most of his teammates stayed. Coach Hoke seems to be the real deal. He brought some top of the line Coordinators. His recruiting team is doing a phenomenal job. It didn’t have to turn out that way. It could have just as easy went the other way. It’s a bold move even if you didn’t want RR to stay.
"I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation. I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation." Bob Devaney, Saginaw native, Alma College Grad ('39), oh, and he did some stuff at Nebraska (11 seasons Head Coach, 101-20-2, 2 National Championships, 26 years as Athletic Director.)
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 6, 2011 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Josh Groban: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-i3jZ0fk9iU
PTC,
Your continual contention that RR would be still be in A2 if UMich had done anything except get blown out is without merit. I contend that RR would be fired if he did not win the game. I contend that the only reason he was still coaching was that Brandon wanted the seniors to be given the best chance to win (which is what he said). Unless you have some inside link to Brandon, I contend that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Here is the definition of bold according to Dictionary.com:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bold
not hesitating or fearful in the face of actual or possible danger or rebuff; courageous and daring: a bold hero.
With this definition in mind, I believe that to be “bold”, an AD has to go against the grain. He has to make a move that may not be popular with his fanbase and alumni etc., but is for the best of the team. The exact opposite of being bold is to be calculated.
Both MSU’s firing of Williams and UMich’s firing of RR were calculated and completely non-bold. Why? Because the pressure to fire those two coaches would have been so great had it not happened. It would have been much more BOLD to keep those coaches. But because of Williams’s response and Rich Rod’s appearance of complete inadequacy (see youtube video in title, which I contend is RR’s “I don’t know” moment), it is much easier to fire the coach than to keep him.
Furthermore, Brandon’s hiring of Hoke after firing RR was a calculated one. It wasn’t just blind luck that Denard and most of his teammates stayed. Brandon hired a coach who knew Denard’s talent, loved Michigan more than anything, and would be able to keep Denard. Hoke talked about Denard BY NAME in his initial press conference which was something that RR never did with Mallett. It’s no surprise that Mallett left and Denard stayed. Brandon cut his losses of a coaching change by chosing a coach who could take advantage of Denard’s talents while at the same time moving Michigan towards it’s more traditional offense. It would be much more “bold” to hire a coach who didn’t care about Denard and wanted to install an I-formation “3 yards and a cloud of dust” offense, but Brandon didn’t.
Also, you maintain say that MSU was bold to fire in season and that it’s bold to fire in January. Then is there any time in the year when it’s NOT BOLD to fire a a coach?!?!? If you can’t fire during the season, and you can’t fire in January then that only leaves February- August. You can’t fire in the middle of recruiting or you’ll lose a bunch of recruits (see OSU right now) and if you fire in the Spring, what are you going to do for Spring Training? Who’s going to implement their system two days after meeting guys for the first time? Unless you can tell me when the perfect time to fire a coach is, you’re argument that January is a terrible month loses all merit.
What would Yzerman do?
Hind Sight is usually 20/20
Everything you have said is looking at the RR firing from the backend. What about the frontend, before it happened. A lot of unknowns that you take for granted because they have work out didn’t have to work out. Oh, yeah. You ignored that the first time I said it. Feel free to ignore it again.
January is a bad time to fire/hire a coach especially if you knew that’s what you were going to do since November. If that’s the case then you’re right, it isn’t bold. It’s lame. And it’s cruel.
So Dave Brandon was just doing his job. He knew he was going to fire RR since November (being lame and cruel) and it doesn’t matter when it was, firing RR was a good idea anytime. He was just cutting his loses. How’s that?
I’d like to think DB is neither lame nor cruel. In your scenario, he’s both.
And since I don’t know what I’m talking about, you are unlikely to change my mind with your compliments. And you shouldn’t mind if I comment that you are still looking at it with hindsight and a dislike for Rich Rodriguez not the decision and execution of that decision.
You can take it or leave it. I’m not worried about what you think about my view. And I know you aren’t worried what I think about your view. I guess Dave calls it “agreeing to disagree.” I’m less polite about it. I call it ’agreeing the other guy is wrong."
"I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation. I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation." Bob Devaney, Saginaw native, Alma College Grad ('39), oh, and he did some stuff at Nebraska (11 seasons Head Coach, 101-20-2, 2 National Championships, 26 years as Athletic Director.)
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 11, 2011 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Hind Sight is 20/20, but some educated fans can predict success
Preachin, just because you didn’t think hiring Hoke would work doesn’t make firing RR any more bold. To me, and many fans like, firing RR was the only option after such a dismal 3 year run. There was nothing bold about it. And if you and AD does his homework. like DB did, it really doesn’t have to be risky, or bold.
January isn’t a bad time to fire/ hire a coach. It’s actually a pretty good time. Being at the end of the system, there are more coaches that are available than at any other point of the year. Had DB fired RR in November, he knew he would have had no shot Harbaugh, considering Harbaugh had no intentions of leaving Stanford. Even w/o Harbaugh, DB knew that he would have other options open that would not be open in November. That’s why most coaching changes happen in the off-season. Firing RR in November wouldn’t help w/ anything. Do you disagree that keeping RR gave UM the best chance to win in the bowl game? If not, then keeping him to coach is neither lame or cruel. It’s the right thing to do for the seniors who stood by your team for the worst 4 year stretch in its entire history. In that case, DB did the right thing, which was actually bold, considering many fans and alumni wanted RR gone before. THAT’S bold. Not firing a coach in the off season. And in no way am I suggesting that DB knew he was going to fire RR. But having a month to prepare for bowl game, and getting blown out certainly did not help. That bowl game was the biggest game in RR’s Michigan career (in terms of his job), he blew it and DB had to make a move.
When someone makes the logical move, a move that most of your fanbase, alumni, former players, wants it’s not bold. Frankly it’s a no-brainer. Just because you didn’t see (and most “writers” her didn’t either) doesn’t make it any more bold or audacious.
What would Yzerman do?
Hold on Cowboy
You are misrepresenting my view here. Though I personally liked RR, I just didn’t see the things that always made it fun to be a Michigan fan. I was not impressed with any phase of Michigan football. I may be in the minority on this blog, but I was not awestruck by the offense. Not the least of which was Denard getting the hell knocked out of him regularly. (too much reliance on one player.) I hope I don’t offend others by repeating myself here. I suspected RR wasn’t going to get it done when we lost to Toledo in year one among other faux pas’s. But I kept hoping he would turn it around. One thing that always amazed me was how little improvement they would show from week to week. So when DB pulled the plug, RR’s leaving was a relief. I disagreed with those who said he should have been given a fourth year.
But I was still very concerned about the replacement and all the things related to another coaching change. When it became evident that Brady Hoke would likely be the man, I wasn’t impressed with his record, but as I looked at what he had done in the last 3 years, I thought it looked pretty good. And his 2010 SDSU team played some pretty tough competition pretty well in his second year. And his introductory presser, well I was sold. I wanted to play for him. I can’t remember the last time a coach’s comments were so motivating. I felt he was “the real deal.” But all of this is post RR dismissal. DB hired a good one. But it could have turned out differently, whether or not you saw the possibility.
I’m not interested in trying to convince you or anyone whether firing RR when he did was bold or a no brainer. After all, it is just opinion. Not something important. But your arguments are making me more secure in my opinion. And yeah, January is a great time to hire a football coach. Look at all those who lined up to take the Michigan job.
"I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation. I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation." Bob Devaney, Saginaw native, Alma College Grad ('39), oh, and he did some stuff at Nebraska (11 seasons Head Coach, 101-20-2, 2 National Championships, 26 years as Athletic Director.)
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 11, 2011 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions
ok, let me get this straight
and i’ll try to be more respectful than I have in the past.
You don’t think that RR should have been given a 4th year. So the firing of Rich Rod was not “bold”. The boldness comes from hiring Brady Hoke?
And considering that you agree with me and most others that firing RR was the correct decision, the boldness was not in RR’s firing, but rather the timing? And you feel that firings should be done in November, rather than January.
Please let me know if I have summarized your arguments correctly.
What would Yzerman do?
if this is accurate,
I don’t think you read the article in the same way I did. It seems to that this article has two parts. Before the break is Dave’s argument as to why firing RR was “bold”, only after the break does dave talk about the hoke hiring itself as bold.
What would Yzerman do?
Yes, I wanted RR to go.
Or at least I thought he wasn’t accomplishing what he was hired to do. I’m not trying to contradict you, or say you are wrong on any part of your thoughts. My line of reasoning goes like this, dee-duh-deee! (Carlos Mencia (sp?)). (Please excuse all my spelling and grammar errors) I’m separating the fact I thought a change was needed from whether a change would be made. I look at it like this, just because I want or think something should happen, doesn’t mean it isn’t a bold move if it does happen. OK, having said that, I think it wouldn’t have been bold had he fired RR in November if that was his plan. It wasn’t bold if his plan was to fire/hire in January. There have been January hires that have worked out well. Look at Tressel at OSU, Well, it was really good for them for a while. But I have a hard time thinking DB deliberately held off firing RR until after the bowl game so the seniors would have a better chance to win. I do think it was his intent to give RR a chance to redeem himself. I’ve said this before, so don’t feel like I’m trying force anything. My view that it was bold comes from my opinion he didn’t expect to be making a change so soon. RR showed he was just not up to bringing Michigan back to prominence. And DB saw this an ended up with the change. OK, you are of the opinion that if you know it needs to be done, it isn’t bold to do it. That’s where the difference is. I think that sometimes doing what needs to be done takes guts. I can’t think of a better example of that than the debt ceiling debates in DC. It is going to take some bold leadership from both sides to iron out a deal. I can accept your stance on this. There is nothing wrong with it. What would be wrong is if you said I was wrong and didn’t have a stance. So anyway, I’m not trying to convince you that I’m right.
As far as hiring Hoke, it may not have been popular at first because people looked at the superficial aspects of his record. It could be considered bold because it didn’t look like a slam dunk idea at first. But as he explained it, and as Coach spoke at the initial presser, it became a slam dunk to me. And whether or not we agree on its “boldness” factor, I think we agree that Hoke is turning out to be a great hire.
"I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation. I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation." Bob Devaney, Saginaw native, Alma College Grad ('39), oh, and he did some stuff at Nebraska (11 seasons Head Coach, 101-20-2, 2 National Championships, 26 years as Athletic Director.)
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 13, 2011 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions
BTW: Go Blue!!
"I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation. I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation." Bob Devaney, Saginaw native, Alma College Grad ('39), oh, and he did some stuff at Nebraska (11 seasons Head Coach, 101-20-2, 2 National Championships, 26 years as Athletic Director.)
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 13, 2011 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions
GO BLUE
Ok.
Well, we’re never going to get to a point where we completely agree but I think we can finally get to a point where we can live with each other’s disagreements.
My main argument with RR’s firing not being bold has nothing to do with whether it was right or wrong. My argument has to do with the PERCEPTION of RR’s firing. For a decision like this to be “bold” I feel that there has to be a perception of surprise from the people that the AD has to answer to, namely the players, alumni, and fanbase. Can anybody truly say that they were surprised when RR was fired? To me examples of “bold” moves by ADs or GMs would be resigning Matt Millen to an extension or letting go of Ernie Harwell. A more relevant example to our topic itself would probably the hiring of Rich Rod in the first place. In all of these “bold” moves there is an element of surprise and sense of disbelief that the action happened. Matt Millen was shocking because he was generally looked upon as the worst GM in the NFL. Ernie was shocking because he was a living legend. RR was shocking because it represented such a drastic change in the football team’s philosophy. Even if you one liked the decision from the beginning, you couldn’t help but be surprised.
Your argument that the timing of the firing, and Hoke’s hiring being “bold” is something I can live with. I can agree that DB’s sort of “winging it” type of plan was a little bold in that it sort of seemed that he was judging RR’s job status on one game. But the team was so unprepared and the game so demoralizing that I don’t think anyone was surprised to see RR go. I know that you aren’t stressing the RR side of things in your arguments, but I still think that it is a point that the author made. To him, it would have been “easier” to keep RR. He even goes ahead and suggests that RR should have kept his job, saying that it’s difficult to judge the trajectory of a team after three years. These are two points I feel that I have disproved by showing that MOST teams that win the BCS national championship do so with a coach that has been at the school for less than 4 years. Was the Hoke hiring bold? Yes, in that he wasn’t the first choice and that people were mostly surprised when he was announced as coach. But I do believe that the author was making points that suggested that RR should have stayed for a fourth year, which were to me, inexcusable.
What would Yzerman do?
I'll Go Along With Most of It
I don’t think that was Dave’s intent. I think that is the problem with blogs. It is hard to read all the different authors and know their intent. If they bring up an idea that may not have been fleshed out, it can easily get turned into something the author never intended. Or a reader can take one phrase out of an article and go on what the author may see as an unrelated tangent. That has happened before. So anyway, blogs can be very interesting. I have to constantly remind myself that most of it is just somebody’s opinion. And even if they present it as fact, it’s not worth me getting uptight, because I do that sometimes. Much more than I care to admit.
"I don't expect to win enough games to be put on NCAA probation. I just want to win enough to warrant an investigation." Bob Devaney, Saginaw native, Alma College Grad ('39), oh, and he did some stuff at Nebraska (11 seasons Head Coach, 101-20-2, 2 National Championships, 26 years as Athletic Director.)
by PreachinTotheChoir on Jul 13, 2011 9:57 PM CDT up reply actions
I think you're missing my point
The point was not that I’m making excuses for Rodriguez, it just an observation on my end. I honestly think that if you’re going to undergo the massive transition that Michigan underwent, that you need about four years to be a national title contender. “Legitimate results” is a qualified statement here. I used this because it’s a constant refrain I hear about the transition. One more year and it would’ve been fine – type statements that are irrefutable because there’s no way to prove or disprove it.
The point of the article was more that Brandon made the bold choice to look past the conventional wisdom, pull the trigger and make a bold move to nix the transition and move back to a more traditional Michigan football team with a more conventional Michigan coach. It was bold because Michigan was already three years down a different road and the easy thing would’ve been to see what happened in year four.
I don’t think it was an easy decision for Brandon to can the guy. There were just enough factors to warrant keeping the guy if Brandon wanted to pass the buck another year. He didn’t. He pulled the trigger and made a hire that not everyone was happy about.
I call that bold.
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Jul 3, 2011 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions
I think your point is flawed
Because of the success that many programs have had with the immediate hiring of a new coach (see my point on BCS championships) fanbases are much less patient when a coach has been unsuccessful after three years. This should especially be the case at a program like MIchigan.
Therefore, I don’t think firing RR was Bold at all. The majority of the fan base wanted RR out (not on this site…) and the Michigan VIPs such as alumni and former players certainly did not want him. To me, it looked like Brandon only took the time he did to appease to members of the fanbase who wanted RR to stay. It’s much better to think about it and come to a conclusion than to appear to fire RR in haste.
Firing RR was not bold because his performance was horrendous. Firing Bo Schembechler would have been bold. Extending Matt Millen’s contract for 5 more years was VERY BOLD. But getting rid of RR? That’s only slightly more bold than firing John Kuester.
What would Yzerman do?

by 





















