Introducing The SB Nation NCAA Conference Re-Draft Project
It's the offseason and we bloggers have too much time on our hands. As a perfect example, I go away for vacation and come home to find out that some of my favortie blogs will be redesigning the college football landscape as we know it, and I didn't even get an email until today. There will be blood spilt over this. Mark my words.
Anyway, let's get down to the important stuff. The whole premise of this Conference Re-Draft Project is to completely overhaul the college football landscape from top to bottom. Six Conferences and a set number of teams. Ain't selected? Too bad. You're done. Got that Iowa State?
/squak/ WHAT!? /static/ YOU SAID WE'D ALWAYS BE FRIENDS! /chirp/
Yeah, I also said I liked Dave Matthews in college so that I could get a chick to make out with me. In sum, Dave Matthews sucks, and I'm selling you down the river for a brighter tomorrow. Specifically, a future that doesn't include you.
So what are we talking about? We're talking about an EA Sports style custom conference here. History, geography, or reason have nothing to do with this project. In fact, throw them into a blender and make yourself a smoothie because you're not going to need them for much else. The SB Nation Conference Realignment Project is designed to be entertaining and to thin the heard of the unwanted college programs. The Project doesn't care if you like playing Wisconsin or Baylor or Mississippi State every year. The Project is cold blooded and calculating. It's also going to be really effing funny. So let's get down to the details.
OBJECTIVES
The purposes of the fantasy draft are: (1) to explore the values of individual schools by drafting them sequentially, and (2) to have fun strategically building a conference of schools.
Because we feel like it there will be six conferences. Period. And these conferences are NOT meant to be new versions of current conferences. We don't want to create tweaked versions of what we already have. We all know how well that's worked out. The goal is to draft schools based on their overall value, and to compile a conference of teams strategically and coherently.
What makes a school valuable? Who the hell knows? We've decided to leave this up to the six conference commissioners to determine, with a few important guidelines. The commissioners have to keep in mind that we're drafting athletics conferences. Therefore athletics should be weighted heaviest, if not exclusively.
Another thing to think about is that, when selecting a school, the Commissioners are bringing on all of its NCAA-sanctioned varsity programs. So if you select Notre Dame for its football program (god forgive them when they do), all of the Irish's other sports come along with it. Same for Duke football ... ick.
So with that in mind, let's be clear. We're human. Other things factor in, like my irrational hatred of sand and love of scenic area outside of Temple's campus. So they decided to give the commissioners a little leeway. So we're allowing them to look at the following are factors that they can, but are not required, to consider:
Academics
Co-eds
Weather/Desirability of Destination
Historic Success
Traditions
TV Revenue Potential
Ethics
Rivalries (two teams)
On the flipside, there are two factors that are NOT to be considered. First, the commissioners can't take travel/geographic concerns into consideration. Think of it as if we invented teleporting (NERDZ). In real life, Washington and Florida are unrealistic conference partners; in our world, that doesn't matter -- neither from a travel or time zone standpoint. Second, and related, while we may take individual rivalries into consideration (e.g. pairing Michigan and Ohio State), preservation of current conference history/rivalry/alliance is not to be considered. Hopefully for obvious reasons.
Again, the goal is not to improve the status quo. The goal is not to create a conference that will actually play games. The goal is to use a draft to value schools and have fun strategically grouping them together.
In sum, there is no single way that schools must be valued and/or grouped together. Some of the commissioners may wish to create the best conference of all-around athletics-academics combination. Others may want to create a revenue superpower. There are any number of valid ways to do this. The only limitation is not creating a group that is based on regional and historical ties. Time to wipe the slate clean and start over.
Here's the critical thing: once a conference drafts 12 members, a conference can be capped by its commissioner if they want. If you're smart, you've got twelve, you stop. However, if commissioners want, the draft will continue for the conferences who wish to add more members (i.e. Big East Coast Bias will likely keep going until they hit 20 programs, but most of them will be basketball programs only).
If in any subsequent round only one conference remains, it may select the remaining members of its conference up to a maximum of 16 schools. So we're not going to end up with six diluted Big Easts. No. These will be great. Ish.
Conference Commissioners
As mentioned above, there will be six conference commissioners. The D-Bags in Charge six conference commissioners are Team Speed Kills (SEC), BC Interruption (Boston College), House of Sparky (Arizona State), Big East Coast Bias (Big East), Black Heart Gold Pants (Iowa), and Red Cup Rebellion (Ole Miss).
By luck of a random number generator, BC Interruption gets first pick in the draft. The complete draft order is as follows:
1. BC Interruption
2. Black Heart Gold Pants
3. Team Speed Kills
4. Big East Coast Bias
5. House of Sparky
6. Red Cup Rebellion
The draft will be a snake draft, meaning RCR will receive the 6th and 7th picks (last pick in the first, first pick in the second). The draft is officially being run by the Oklahoma State Cowboys blog Cowboys Ride For Free, so CRFF will be playing the role of supervising overlord. CRFF has the final say in the matter in any and all disputes.
Schedule: This week, we are introducing the Re-Draft project and want to get the conversation going.
The Schedule and Other Details
On Monday, June 13, BC Interruption is on the clock. They'll need to submit our first overall pick of the draft then. Upon making their first round selection, their conference commissioner (so, them) will then consult with their draft choice (assuming SBN has a participating blogger for that school) and the two of them will collectively decide on our draft strategy and make our second round choice. It sorta builds from there, with every subsequent school's blog having a say in the next program drafted.
By Friday of next week, each conference will have a commissioner, two schools and up to two more bloggers and SBN communities to collaborate with on picks. By Sunday, June 19, with a conference commissioner and two schools solidifying the conference's identity, we'll select the name of the conference.
On Monday, June 20, Cowboys Ride For Free will announce the conference names and recap the first two rounds of the draft. Over here at RCR, the first two members of the conference will be announced, discussed and dissected.
After the big reveal of conference names and founding members, the draft will continue in much the same manner, with two draft picks a week for the next several weeks.
Finally, on Monday July 25, the full and complete conference rosters will be announced and discussed across the SB Nation community of NCAA sites.
So if you've gotten this far, great. We want to make sure that everyone clearly understands the objectives and rules as this sort of thing only works if we're all operating in the same universe. So sit back and follow along. We'll see where Michigan goes, and then we'll start lobbying hard for the important stuff.
Hot Co-eds.
10 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm pulling hard for ya
Down here on the RCR blog. Don’t hate me, but we’re also pulling for Wisconsin as a middle round draft pick.
And if you get picked by us, basically all we care about are the hot chicks. Its not like we’re any good at sports.
Who do I see about a petition for a real black bear?
by Jevan Snead's Agent on Jun 9, 2011 11:06 AM CDT reply actions
If I had Hot Chicks like Ole Miss
I wouldn’t give two shits about sports either. ;)
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Jun 9, 2011 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions
Michigan would be a welcomed member of the ERGCC,
or the “Eschew Rules and Get Cash Conference.” When I’m in charge, it’s all about the dollars, something which I’m sure David “Pizza Mogul” Brandon would appreciate.
[Michigan related aside: I’m going to meet Brady Hoke, John Beilein, and David Brandon this Sunday. I’m not kidding. Should I ask/say/do anything towards them for your amusement?]
Red Cup Rebellion - Changing the Culture of Ole Miss Athletics
Sports are chaotic and stupid; and we're bad at them.
by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Jun 9, 2011 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Tell them
Tell them they’re doing a great job planting this ‘evidence’ at Ohio State ;)
Or tell them I would probably if they actually beat Ohio State for once
by hurdlertony149 on Jun 9, 2011 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Hmmmmm
Be nice to them and tell them that you get all your Michigan related news through Maize n Brew. Add that you think they should hire me.
On the main topic: always had a feeling that Michigan and Ole Miss would blend well together. Something about a “civilized” tailgate and a sense of superiority over everyone else that we seem to share. ;)
Maize n Brew
Because Football is Better with Beer
by Maize n Brew Dave on Jun 9, 2011 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah except you guys have "snow"...
… whatever the hell that is.
Who do I see about a petition for a real black bear?
by Jevan Snead's Agent on Jun 10, 2011 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions
It's like water, but you have to wait until July to swim in it.
That is sooooo not funny - Maize N Brew Dave
This should be interesting.
Lets see if your big conference BCS bias shines through as I expect. It will be interesting to see them justifying how Duke, Kentucky and Vandy deserve to be in a BCS Conference while national championship programs like Houston and BYU are on the outside looking in.
The results should be good for a chuckle.
CJ
It would not be indicative of a big conference bias to select Duke, UK, or Vandy over BYU or Houston.
A good argument could be made for Houston > Vandy, but that’s about it.
This re-draft isn’t just an exercise in football. We’re looking at everything about the schools which make them attractive members of a conference. Duke and Kentucky’s basketball programs alone earn them serious consideration in this draft, whereas Vandy’s non-football abilities (they’ve been one of the better SEC basketball and baseball programs over the past several years – even producing a #1 draft pick and top-5 type rankings in the latter) and academics give it an edge.
BYU can’t float by on Ty Detmer and Jimmer Ferdette, just as Houston can’t do the same with Andre Ware and Hakeem Olajuwan.
Red Cup Rebellion - Changing the Culture of Ole Miss Athletics
Sports are chaotic and stupid; and we're bad at them.
by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Jun 13, 2011 7:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Duke and Kentucky’s basketball programs alone earn them serious consideration in this draft
So you are building BCS conferences based on the bandwagon popularity of basketball programs? Aside from a few toothless rednecks in Kentucky, no one cares about UK. They play in a intramural level basketball conference against football schools. What success they have had has been tainted by 10 NCAA investigations.
How do you know that BYU and Houston wouldn’t have the same national appeal as Duke if they had ESPN pumping them up everyday?
Sorry but I think for myself. I don’t need Dickie V telling me how great Duke is every minute I turn on the TV.
Perhaps I’m old school but school but any so-called draft that uses bimbos as some criteria for selection is a waste of bandwith.
CJ

by 




















