ESPN Game Recap || MGoBlog Recap || Highlight Video
|Michigan 40, Ohio State 34|
|EqPts Differential: Michigan +6.344|
|Michigan||Ohio State||Michigan||Ohio State|
|TOTAL PLAYS||64||55||STANDARD DOWNS||48||39|
|Success Rate||0.563||0.455||Success Rate||0.521||0.513|
|Points Per Play||0.505||0.472||Points Per Play||0.430||0.570|
|SR + PPP||1.067||0.927||SR + PPP||0.951||1.083|
|PASSING PLAYS||17||24||PASSING DOWNS||16||16|
|Success Rate||0.647||0.458||Success Rate||0.688||0.313|
|Points Per Play||0.785||0.646||Points Per Play||0.729||0.234|
|SR + PPP||1.432||1.105||SR + PPP||1.417||0.546|
|RUSHING PLAYS||47||31||1st Down S&P||0.791||1.363|
|Success Rate||0.532||0.452||2nd Down S&P||1.394||0.523|
|Points Per Play||0.404||0.337||3rd Down S&P||1.072||0.566|
|SR + PPP||0.935||0.789|
|1st Quarter S&P||1.055||0.761|
|Standard Down Rush S&P||0.900||0.846||2nd Quarter S&P||1.004||1.284|
|Standard Down Pass S&P||1.204||1.389||3rd Quarter S&P||1.056||0.716|
|Passing Down Rush S&P||1.137||0.649||4th Quarter S&P||1.135||0.769|
|Passing Down Pass S&P||1.634||0.414|
|Leverage Rate||75.0 %||70.9 %|
|TURNOVERS||1||1||% of plays past midfield||48.4 %||41.8 %|
Stat Definitions (via Football Study Hall):
Leverage Rate: A team's ratio of standard downs to passing downs. National average: 68%. Anything over 68% means a team did a good job of avoiding being leveraged into passing downs.
Passing Downs: Second-and-7 or more, third-and-5 or more.
PPP: An explosiveness measure derived from determining the point value of every yard line (based on the expected number of points an offense could expect to score from that yard line) and, therefore, every play of a given game.EqPts is the sum PPP of every play run by an offense. National average: 0.32.
S&P: Think of this as an OPS (the "On-Base Plus Slugging" baseball measure) for football. The 'S' stands for success rate. The 'P' stands for PPP, an explosiveness measure that stands for EqPts Per Play. For more about this measure, visit the main S&P+ page at Football Outsiders. National average: 0.747. Standard downs S&P average: 0.787. Passing downs S&P average: 0.636.
Standard Downs: First downs, second-and-6 or less, third-and-4 or less.
Success Rate: A common Football Outsiders tool used to measure efficiency by determining whether every play of a given game was successful or not. The terms of success in college football: 50 percent of necessary yardage on first down, 70 percent on second down, and 100 percent on third and fourth down. National Average: 42%.
Analysis after the jump:
Outside all of the narratives, the streak-breaking, and the "oh my goodness, this actually happened", I feel like this game -- the game itself, the plays, the drives, and the scores -- weren't quite analyzed as fully as possible. Maybe that was the right thing -- celebrating the win was much more important. Looking at the win itself and what that win meant for the program, not how the win happened, was what people understandably did after the game. Now, looking back many months later, I'm seeing the numbers and just fully realizing how crazy of a game this was. Michigan's offense looked like a juggernaut against a pretty good defense. Denard Robinson turned in one of the greatest performances by any Wolverine ever in this rivalry (14-17 passing, 168 yards and three touchdowns through the air, and 170 rushing yards and two touchdowns, with only one turnover). Michigan's defense was only just good enough and struggled against a mostly inept offense. All that matters is that Michigan won, finally, but it was a truly crazy game regardless of the context. Add in the context, and well, wow.
Michigan's Offense vs. Ohio State's Defense:
It was surreal to see Michigan's offense be so successful against Ohio State after failing to surpass 10 points against the Buckeyes in the previous four meetings, but Michigan's offense was dominant against the Buckeyes. It's not hard to see why: Michigan moved the ball well by passing and running the ball (a success rate of 0.647 and 0.532 respectively), there were a few big plays -- Denard's first long touchdown on an outside run and his two lasers over the middle for touchdowns to Junior Hemingway to Martavious Odoms -- and overall, throughout the game, Michigan's offense was consistently excellent. It's not like there were a bunch of fluke plays either -- Michigan's passing success rate was its highest mark of the season, and its overall success rate (0.563) was only lower than games against Western Michigan and Minnesota. Michigan's Points Per Play was rather average, but its overall S&P was excellent -- the second-best mark in Big Ten play. Denard was virtuosic for the entire game, rarely making mistakes and his passing S&P was only higher against Northwestern and Notre Dame. Since he threw a few interceptions in those games, this game against Ohio State was his best passing performance of the year. In and of itself, Michigan's offense was good enough to blow out the Buckeyes. Unfortunately, the defense didn't quite play as well.
Michigan's Defense vs. Ohio State's Offense:
Ohio State's offense struggled mightily in 2011 with Joe Bauserman at the helm, and even when Braxton Miller finally won the job for good, they still were madly inconsistent at best, and thoroughly mediocre at worst. Still, against Michigan, they put together their best performance of the year and almost sprung the upset in Ann Arbor. Ohio State was mostly effective on first down and struggled in second and third-and-long situations, but the Buckeyes were able to use big plays on those downs and scored on a lot of those big plays -- Miller's early touchdown to Corey Brown and his late first half scoring strike to the newly reinstated DeVier Posey were each plays over 40 yards. Both of those plays, as well as a 19-yard touchdown run by Miller, came on first down. To Michigan's credit, the Buckeyes really only had one great quarter -- the second, in which they scored 17 points -- and the Wolverines were able to slow down Ohio State as the game went on. Ohio State's success rate in the second quarter was 0.667, and no other quarter had an OSU success rate of more than 0.3571. Miller was inconsistent throughout the day and completed only 14 of his 25 pass attempts, but notably missed on a long bomb to Posey that would have put Ohio State in the lead with less than two minutes on the clock. Overall, Michigan's defense was porous and suspect to big plays from explosive playmakers on the OSU offense. Michigan only allowed a higher S&P against Northwestern and Notre Dame.
What this means for next year:
Basically, Ohio State is going to have to do a lot of adjusting to prepare for Michigan's offense, and Michigan fans should be very concerned that, with some elite coaching, Ohio State's offense will put it together and play with some consistency. I'd be surprised if the Buckeye defense fared much better next year -- Denard is back and he singlehandedly destroyed the OSU defense, not with big plays, but with consistent execution throughout the game. On the other side of the ball, if Urban Meyer can coach Miller up to be an elite quarterback, his arm and his legs will continue to give the Wolverine defense a ton of problems. I'd expect another high-scoring game next year in the Horseshoe.