Michigan Wolverines head football coach Jim Harbaugh has been transparent about the desire to see changes at all levels of the sport and laid out a proposal on Thursday in an “open letter to the football community.”
Harbaugh spoke back in October when asked about the name, image and likeness issue floating around the NCAA and said that players should be allowed to declare after their first season in college. If a player goes undrafted, he should be allowed to return to school. He does not believe college should be a hindrance to being able to make money for your talents.
Some of the key points made in his proposal are:
- Players would be allowed to declare for the NFL Draft at any point as early as following their true freshman season.
- Players drafted after the first 224 picks would be able to return to school assuming they did not receive payment from an agent.
- Any players that leave early would be able to continue their pursuit of a degree while in the NFL, or resume after their pro careers are over. For each year they attended the school, they would be allowed that many years additional paid schooling by the university.
- Expanding the rules that allow players and their families to seek guidance on pursuing a professional opportunity.
Here is the full letter from Harbaugh directed to all levels of football and what he would propose:
May 7, 2020
An Open Letter to the Football Community‐
In my opinion, we are in need of constructive, proactive discussion about the evolving issues facing intercollegiate football. In today’s world, many young men and their families perceive college football as preventing them from earning a living as a professional football player. That is not an unreasonable perception given the rules currently in place.
The discussion centers around two of our present models of football, the intercollegiate amateur model and the professional model, and most importantly, those who participate in those models. Much of that discussion centers around when the college experience ends and the professional career begins. The parties most affected in this discussion are the student‐athlete and their families. The crux of my proposal is to put the decision in the hands of the family and the demand of the National Football League. Presently, the decision excludes the family until the student‐athlete is three years removed from high school.
My first proposal is that we put this decision to “go or stay” in the hands of the individual and his family, not in the form of an NFL, NFLPA or NCAA rule, while allowing the player to return to college football if he does not sign. This would change both the existing rule that requires a football player to be three years removed from high school in order to be draft eligible and the rule that does not let the non‐drafted player return to college if he chooses.
1. The individual could choose to declare for the professional draft after any season he chooses. If he is drafted within the first 224 picks of the NFL Draft, or chooses to sign a free agent contract, he would forego remaining college eligibility. However, if the individual is not drafted within the first 224 picks of the NFL Draft, he would be able to return to college football if he chooses without penalty, provided he remains in academic compliance and does not receive payment from an agent.
2. The individual leaving college “early” prior to graduation who signs an NFL contract would be entitled to complete his degree while in the NFL, or return to the institution that he left, to continue his college career as a student once his pro career was completed. This would be done at the expense of the University based on a schedule of years participated in college. (For example, if the student‐athlete played one year in college he is entitled to one additional year of paid schooling; if he plays in two or three years in college he is entitled to two additional years of paid schooling; if he plays four years in college he is entitled to one additional year of paid schooling ‐ however, he would no longer have intercollegiate football eligibility). Such a policy promotes higher education as a top priority.
3. A broadening of the rules to permit a student‐athlete and his family to consult with and seek advice on or before signing a professional contract from lawyers and agents so long as the S/A does not receive compensation. The stakes and complexities involved require players to be well informed and this is the time to begin encouraging them to be intelligent and informed.
Further areas for debate and study would include:
A future model to consider:
A clean, clear and concise college eligibility of five years for football without a “red shirt” clause needed to compete for five years.
A consideration of eliminating the current “hard cap” rule which limits each school to a combined maximum of 25 scholarships per year for incoming freshmen and transfers each year.
I continue to support:
The current graduate transfer rule allowing a graduate to transfer without sitting out.
The proposed “One Time Transfer” rule allowing a S/A, a one‐time transfer to another school without sitting out.
Further explanation to the thought process:
I was fortunate to attend the University of Michigan on a football scholarship, played football and earned a meaningful academic degree over a five‐year period of time. After graduating, I was drafted by the Chicago Bears. By my 30th birthday, I was blessed and fortunate to have played professional football for seven years and accumulated enough money to put my family in a good place, with a degree that presented opportunities outside of football as well.
While that was great for me and can be for many current football athletes, it may not be best for all.
There are “early bloomers”, capable of competing in the NFL and earning a livelihood at an earlier age.
The goal would be to create a scenario that makes adjustments for all current and future student‐athletes that puts the timeline for transition to professional football at their discretion and that of their family. I propose an option that allows them to make the decision that is best for them.
Families, and sons could have a clearer, more concise and fact driven approach to their future. For example, if one is a student and athlete talented enough to be offered a football scholarship to college, he could choose to continue his studies and playing career at the amateur level. After any season during his college career that he would feel ready to be a pro, he could declare himself eligible to be drafted. If drafted approximately the first 224 picks he would have to start his pro career and no longer be eligible to compete in college football. If not drafted in the first 224 picks he could choose to return to college with his eligibility intact or choose to sign an NFL free agent contract and also forgo his remaining college eligibility.
The average pro career is three to four years. When a players’ pro career is complete, he could return to college to finish his degree. He is then not denied his professional opportunity and is more mature and likely more motivated to finish his college education and receive his degree. He also is uniquely positioned to enhance the educational experience of other classmates on campus. This option creates a scenario more likely for more young men to have reached thirty having earned both a pro career and a college degree.
The proposal described above would allow the individual to pursue his dream as a student and as a professional athlete in the time frame that best suits his best interests of his own free will and ability.
I welcome all concerned to participate in a meaningful discussion and I also welcome the opportunity to participate.
I want to personally thank my father, Jack Harbaugh, and Athletic Director Warde Manuel for their extensive input and discussion, and President Mark Schlissel for his conversation regarding my views on this subject. These views are my own and are not necessarily those of the University of Michigan.